holy shitIn post 3211, Titus wrote:Hi. It's Saturday. I am VLA today. I went to Electrical. Maestro and Blitzo were there with me. My posting will be slower to ensure I can do the task.
Pedit - What room was that Reck?
Pedit 2 - Lie better BM. 3 conftown.
VOTE: Battle Mage
lol I don't really know what her point is. I assumed she was suggesting I lied about being stuck in cafeteria, and my rebuttal was, a bunch of us were all stuck there so...clearly not a lie.In post 3224, Taly wrote:BM, you're not counteringTitus'point on you.
How have you been unable to get intoElectricalthe past two nights, and even then, how did you knowCafewas locked when you didn't mention that you'd be there for a task?
Who is"we"?
p-edit
And how don't you remember who was in your PT last night? What?
so it was definitely DGB, Pooky and OWER, but maybe someone else, I don't recall. It could only have been people who were there N1 I guess. 
SirCakez's assumption is that you saw a possible out and decided to risk going for it instead of completing the busIn post 3216, Battle Mage wrote:dude, I'll take the hit for my gut ultimately being wrong (my apols, wagonomics etc.). But "counter wagon attempt"? Get real! I was the first and only vote on Blitzo I think and declined the opportunity to join larger wagons available at the time.In post 3208, SirCakez wrote:SirCakez thinks battle mage is very suspicious for his counter wagon attempt
The only way it really stacks up for BM-scum is if you argue that I decided to half-heartedly defend my scum-partner due to "gut" and not take the opportunity to finish bussing/distancing which I'd already started, because it would be such a nonsensical play as scum. Which is fine - it's possible I could do that. But likely? Nah. And for what it's worth, although I love a gambit, it's too high level a scumplay for a large theme game to be really effective. Like, there's no way BM-scum isn't just finishing the bus on Bell there.
From my perspective, scum mostly/all probably on the wagon yesterday given there was no counter-wagon of any note, and the Bell elim was a slow burn, so there's no excuse not to have distanced.
SirCakez needs to re-think.
who was this?
yeah, I'd suggest re-reading how yesterday actually went if you really think this. Like, if you believe I was doing some gambit of "there's no way BM-scum would do something so nonsensical" then fine. But if you're actually pitching that I genuinely chose not to bus in order to save my teammate, and then...didn't really do anything of note to save said teammate... you just need to go back and look at what happened.In post 3229, SirCakez wrote:SirCakez's assumption is that you saw a possible out and decided to risk going for it instead of completing the busIn post 3216, Battle Mage wrote:dude, I'll take the hit for my gut ultimately being wrong (my apols, wagonomics etc.). But "counter wagon attempt"? Get real! I was the first and only vote on Blitzo I think and declined the opportunity to join larger wagons available at the time.In post 3208, SirCakez wrote:SirCakez thinks battle mage is very suspicious for his counter wagon attempt
The only way it really stacks up for BM-scum is if you argue that I decided to half-heartedly defend my scum-partner due to "gut" and not take the opportunity to finish bussing/distancing which I'd already started, because it would be such a nonsensical play as scum. Which is fine - it's possible I could do that. But likely? Nah. And for what it's worth, although I love a gambit, it's too high level a scumplay for a large theme game to be really effective. Like, there's no way BM-scum isn't just finishing the bus on Bell there.
From my perspective, scum mostly/all probably on the wagon yesterday given there was no counter-wagon of any note, and the Bell elim was a slow burn, so there's no excuse not to have distanced.
SirCakez needs to re-think.
which obviously didn't pan out
lol do youIn post 3231, Taly wrote:I had to readBM'sexplanation 5 times over to realize what he meant
I wantOWER/Pooky/DGBto validateBM'sclaim.
based off gameplay, i can solidly argue how you're town, i was just tripped up by your entry post this dayphase and i think 2858 has some rough edges to the solve, but I'm not going further than that yet because the conclusiveIn post 3234, Battle Mage wrote:lol do youIn post 3231, Taly wrote:I had to readBM'sexplanation 5 times over to realize what he meant
I wantOWER/Pooky/DGBto validateBM'sclaim.reallythink there is any chance that I'm scum and just made up that 3 people could give me an alibi? i'm not sure i really understand the benefit of scum lying about their rooms being locked anyway - they don't actually complete tasks, so what does it matter? It's not like I ended up in a room with 1 other person and they mysteriously died.
i think this day is gonna be hard work...
I pretty much thoughtBattle Mage wrote:Titus being alive worries me slightly, given how yesterday played out. Surely she gets NKed over Gamma there?
And I was locked IN cafeteria. Someone wants some of us getting food borne illnesses.In post 3212, xRECKONERx wrote:Yeah I couldn't get into cafeteria
Anyway the task I picked up is the exact same one haschel has which made me think he was faking it yesterday like maybe scum had an ability to find out what task their kill target had but then someone pointed out tasks aren't unique so
FunnyIn post 3239, OutWorldER wrote:Cafeteria was locked, nobody out or appearing
BM scummy for other reasons i've talked about before, I think with Bell's wagon scum are likely to be either off the wagon completely or near the tail end
my suspects are BM, DGB, Flea. BM I feel most stronk about
VOTE: Battle Mage
failed task yesterday, posting still weird today
because I was there the night beforeIn post 3242, DrippingGoofball wrote:FunnyIn post 3239, OutWorldER wrote:Cafeteria was locked, nobody out or appearing
BM scummy for other reasons i've talked about before, I think with Bell's wagon scum are likely to be either off the wagon completely or near the tail end
my suspects are BM, DGB, Flea. BM I feel most stronk about
VOTE: Battle Mage
failed task yesterday, posting still weird today
Because you posted in Cafeteria.
His name was on the list of players I could iso from the thread. I wrote it down on paper.
I know.In post 3246, OutWorldER wrote:bruhDrippingGoofball wrote:VOTE: OutWorldER
Byeeeeeeee lying scum
literally go back to D1, look where I claimed my task
you were literally with me Cafeteria N1
