so when Peta claims child, it's proof he must be child.In post 1348, MathBlade wrote:It’s all wine. That’s all it is. This what you would or wouldn’t do.
the fact that there are child CCs means the remaining mafia member isn't loved, thoughIn post 1351, Titus wrote:I ran this a few times. Nothing is conclusive but my tentative conclusion is DV was bussing peta hoping to get the cred from busing the mechanically weaker mafia member.
Can you explain it?In post 1351, Titus wrote:I ran this a few times. Nothing is conclusive but my tentative conclusion is DV was bussing peta hoping to get the cred from busing the mechanically weaker mafia member.
This is false.In post 1352, petapan wrote:the fact that there are child CCs means the remaining mafia member isn't loved, thoughIn post 1351, Titus wrote:I ran this a few times. Nothing is conclusive but my tentative conclusion is DV was bussing peta hoping to get the cred from busing the mechanically weaker mafia member.
It’s not that he did it, it’s how he did it. It was an origin out of the gate. I don’t see Peta scum claiming child first, hearing his case towards Titus scum then having you CC if he’s aware you’re the child.In post 1350, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:so when Peta claims child, it's proof he must be child.In post 1348, MathBlade wrote:It’s all wine. That’s all it is. This what you would or wouldn’t do.
when I claim child, it must be WIFOM tricks from Pooky!scum.
Do you really not understand how confbiased and tunneled you are being right now?
Look at the motivations for me/peta in both possible worlds from our POVs.
Correct I didn’t. You’re not in control here. I read the post.In post 1349, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:you never responded to this btw.In post 1329, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:In post 1283, MathBlade wrote:Damn you like the wash cycle.In post 1281, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:tell me one thing that peta has done today that doesnt make sense if he is scum.
The wall then claiming child. Already did.
Your assertions about things that don't make sense in a Scum!Peta World:
1) A wall post at DayStart
2) Claiming Child.
I will debunk these:
1) A scum has more control over the start of day and is prepared for Day-Start. There is no actual good reason why a scum would not have a wall post written and ready for the day-start given they control the nightkill.
2) Claiming Child. Again - Peta knows that I am the actual Child. He knows that by claiming Child, he will guranteed go into a 1v1 against me. Now think from the POV of Peta-Scum.
You know:
1) Pooky looks scummy and disconnected
2) Mathblade is tunneling Pooky scum and wants to vote there.
3) If you have MB's vote, you only need Titus vote to win the game, at worst Titus says no but MB is with you hard and you can convince her later.
Either way this 1v1 is very very good for Peta and fairly simple for him to win as long as MB behaves as he expects, which is to remain tunneled on Pooky.
Can you raise any counter argument for why these actions actually do not make sense for Scum!Peta to do?
I just don’t see this mechanically. Please I am begging here explain how this would be a bus.In post 1351, Titus wrote:I ran this a few times. Nothing is conclusive but my tentative conclusion is DV was bussing peta hoping to get the cred from busing the mechanically weaker mafia member.
because?In post 1356, MathBlade wrote:It’s not that he did it, it’s how he did it. It was an origin out of the gate. I don’t see Peta scum claiming child first, hearing his case towards Titus scum then having you CC if he’s aware you’re the child.In post 1350, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:so when Peta claims child, it's proof he must be child.In post 1348, MathBlade wrote:It’s all wine. That’s all it is. This what you would or wouldn’t do.
when I claim child, it must be WIFOM tricks from Pooky!scum.
Do you really not understand how confbiased and tunneled you are being right now?
Look at the motivations for me/peta in both possible worlds from our POVs.
Do you have a response to my counterpoint?In post 1357, MathBlade wrote:Correct I didn’t. You’re not in control here. I read the post.
DV either bussed his partner in RVS (pooky) or peta when he was threatened. Peta flipping scum eliminates the loved parent problem and gets DV towncred.In post 1359, MathBlade wrote:I just don’t see this mechanically. Please I am begging here explain how this would be a bus.In post 1351, Titus wrote:I ran this a few times. Nothing is conclusive but my tentative conclusion is DV was bussing peta hoping to get the cred from busing the mechanically weaker mafia member.
Sorry I was taking care of holiday stuff.In post 1362, Titus wrote:DV either bussed his partner in RVS (pooky) or peta when he was threatened. Peta flipping scum eliminates the loved parent problem and gets DV towncred.In post 1359, MathBlade wrote:I just don’t see this mechanically. Please I am begging here explain how this would be a bus.In post 1351, Titus wrote:I ran this a few times. Nothing is conclusive but my tentative conclusion is DV was bussing peta hoping to get the cred from busing the mechanically weaker mafia member.
I'll check back in an hour. We need to solve this prior to the escape room tonight.
This vote almost if never changes on D1. This would be a very odd strategy for Peta scum. They’d have to be intentionally bussing D1 which is almost always a losing proposition.In post 727, petapan wrote:VOTE: deasvailIn post 642, DeasVail wrote:Like I still didn’t strongly think Koba was scum. I was mainly trying to work that out.
And I still don’t know what to think of this