In post 129, Ninetales wrote: In post 127, Pickles wrote:My reasoning for the vote is there attached to it.
Her reaction to my SR on her seemed to be shading me.
She called my reads fake, when I worked very hard on them.
The reads are my thought process while ISO diving each player.
What other reasoning does Nine have to call them fake?
The only reason I can see is to make other players feel that way too.
Which means she is shading me to seem like my reads aren’t real.
This feels very scum motivated.
Pay attention to pronouns please.
I didn't shade you. The reason why I dislike your post is because the effort is through the roof and we are only on page 5.
Pao and Marci are posting huge blocks of text as well but from what I can tell they aren't really that reads related(they were arguments) whereas yours were completely reads.
I feel like that much effort in a reads list on page 5 is fake.
Corrected in quote, apologies for mistake.
I’m upset because I feel like I wasted my time last night.
I didn’t know how else to read people besides making reads.
I’m this high effort wherever I play, I have no idea how it is here.
Would you like me to link you to my other forum?
There’s been AI content rather than fluff + spam.
Shouldn’t we all have decent reads on people by now?
And the fact that you think my reads are fake is definitely shade.
You also say the effort is through the roof, yet they’re fake.
From my experience, fake reads have very little evidence to back them up.
I provided my entire thought process during my reads.
Are you suggestions my thoughts process is faked?