It's also why I made posts telling Flavor things shall not be discussed.In post 4769, Hench Princesses wrote:I thought this sounded really awkward and clumsy from a design perspective but now that I know they're lovers across time it sounds really romanticIn post 4765, Titus wrote:We're lovers if in the same timeline forward or inverted
-E
Ew. This post only makes sense if you don’t Consider her claim to be a part of her play and that’s just a silly position to hold.In post 4772, Brian Skies wrote:Like, I don't even care about her claim.
I think she's scum off of play.
Been weighing the same thing the whole game. I still would be quiet but for Bell being run up. I would rather look weird for having an eccentric focus on SS. But we can't lose the doc if SS is town.In post 4774, Hench Princesses wrote:I 100% buy the role as real, I'm mulling over the likelihood of cakezzz putting a scum in a lovers pairing given the other mechanics in the game and it's not immediately obvious to me whether it spews one way or the other
maybe it should but it hasn't clicked yet
-E
You have a vote.In post 4777, Bell wrote:This is what I don’t get, where the fuck is your wait a minute moment?
It’s inexplicably missing.
Because I'm trying to eliminate the fuck out of her and she's now using this as a 'get out of being eliminated for free' card.In post 4773, Bell wrote:Lovers are not masons. I am aware. But i’m Asking how *scum* Titus benefits.
And now you think that she's town for her claim despite supposedly trying to tie me to her supposed 'lover's' flip?In post 3769, Titus wrote:I haven't read this stuff in the middle, but this makes me suspect of BS scum with SS.
If SS is scum, scum want me dead prior to the merge. I'm not obvtowning enough to make that happen so BS pushes on me. Add in the fact the mechanics FoS them a bit and welll...
Yes, she claimed lover, that was her get out of jail free card.In post 4780, Brian Skies wrote:Because I'm trying to eliminate the fuck out of her and she's now using this as a 'get out of being eliminated for free' card.In post 4773, Bell wrote:Lovers are not masons. I am aware. But i’m Asking how *scum* Titus benefits.
And now you think that she's town for her claim despite supposedly trying to tie me to her supposed 'lover's' flip?In post 3769, Titus wrote:I haven't read this stuff in the middle, but this makes me suspect of BS scum with SS.
If SS is scum, scum want me dead prior to the merge. I'm not obvtowning enough to make that happen so BS pushes on me. Add in the fact the mechanics FoS them a bit and welll...
SS confirmed it.In post 4780, Brian Skies wrote:Because I'm trying to eliminate the fuck out of her and she's now using this as a 'get out of being eliminated for free' card.In post 4773, Bell wrote:Lovers are not masons. I am aware. But i’m Asking how *scum* Titus benefits.
And now you think that she's town for her claim despite supposedly trying to tie me to her supposed 'lover's' flip?In post 3769, Titus wrote:I haven't read this stuff in the middle, but this makes me suspect of BS scum with SS.
If SS is scum, scum want me dead prior to the merge.I'm not obvtowning enough to make that happen so BS pushes on me. Add in the fact the mechanics FoS them a bit and welll...
This is a good pointIn post 4780, Brian Skies wrote:And now you think that she's town for her claim despite supposedly trying to tie me to her supposed 'lover's' flip?
Until you reconcile your push on me, I'm going to end you.In post 4784, Titus wrote:SS confirmed it.
You also literally just quoted a lover crumb btw. If SS is scum, you want me dead before we get to the same timeline. Not sure if SS is, but you literally quoted a crumb to shade my claim.
Lover in a game with 2 kpn certainly says a doctor. Period.In post 4787, Brian Skies wrote:Like I don't know how you can sit here and let Titus be like 'I must be town because I'm a Lover and I think my role implies Doctor' despite there being no correlation between the two roles having to exist together and when she's also been trying to tie her own Lover's flip to me.
I'm literally unraveling all of her play right now and people are like "yeah, idk, maybe it's just Titus being Titus."
And her push on me is awful anyway.
Your mates can help you end me then.In post 4788, Brian Skies wrote:Until you reconcile your push on me, I'm going to end you.In post 4784, Titus wrote:SS confirmed it.
You also literally just quoted a lover crumb btw. If SS is scum, you want me dead before we get to the same timeline. Not sure if SS is, but you literally quoted a crumb to shade my claim.
Many pages is less than 5 hours.In post 4791, Brian Skies wrote:I'm not trying to eliminate Bell. I'm trying to get him to vote you.
Idk what your fascination is with me trying to get Bell when I moved away from that many pages ago.
I already did what you asked. You repeating it is spam.In post 4793, Brian Skies wrote:Like, I haven't even asked you for much Titus.
Just for you to explain your claims on me. But you can't even do that and your only defense to that is 'oh I will just towncase everyone else' or 'I'm a lover.'
In post 4568, Brian Skies wrote:Let's be real here.In post 4559, Hench Princesses wrote:so I thought some more and I thini skitter is scum because watcher+ic vs strongman is a shitty unfun mechanic for scum and I don't think cakezz would design a shit setup. Doc+ic vs strongman sounds way better.
also the idea that skitter is actively wrong about me + nachotammy in one game might actually just be outside her townrange
That the vis in inverted are taking her off the table pretty much confirms she's scum as well
-E
I feel like the issue isn't so much the Doc+Watcher combination. Especially since not only does the Watcher have to be town enough to convince the other side to turnstile them, but to do so in a way that doesn't let them get instantly rekt by the scumteam after doing so. If anything, it could be to reward the town with a way to get a solve in our thread for good play.
The combination I have an issue with is the Doc+BG combination (which comes online starting Day 4 and possibly earlier if the Doctor finds a way to get turnstiled to the other side), which would require the scumteam to have some sort of answer to prevent circular protections (a la strongman, roleblocker, or other appropriate counters).
Does this sound to you like I'm discounting the possibility of a Doctor being in this game?In post 4574, Brian Skies wrote:Okay.In post 4569, Dunnstral wrote:He is claiming vt in inverse thread
Even then, the issue still comes around Day 4. And for both to be true, the scumteam would need some way to deal with that (and I don't see how a scum-Strongman or -Roleblocker are unreasonable).
I also don't really have an issue with the combination of Doc + IC + Watcher that needs to get turnstiled.
Like, I just find the entire mechanics argument to be rather unconvincing.
Right fucking here.In post 4787, Brian Skies wrote:Like I don't know how you can sit here and let Titus be like 'I must be town because I'm a Lover and I think my role implies Doctor' despite there being no correlation between the two roles having to exist together and when she's also been trying to tie her own Lover's flip to me.