persona off?In post 372, Flea The Magician wrote:OK gloves off, persona off, lets go raw.
I already have - are you actually denying you did this? You admitted it earlier, but claimed it was in jest (despite it proving effective).In post 372, Flea The Magician wrote: Provide evidence of me using AtE to guilt people off voting for me.
I don't think you repeatedly trying to overlay my own viewpoint with your own interpretation of it is very sorting-friendly, or helpful. It comes across like you are bad-faithing me, and don't really care about determining if I am town or scum. I think 1 player has commented that they didn't understand the case on you, and that player admitted they were drunk and is also in the possible elim-pool for today. Other players have clearly seen the same thing I have. You are very defensive about it.In post 372, Flea The Magician wrote: My account of what your case is, is exactly that. My account. You haven't provided much else that I've seen and others have also commented as such.
Will you criticise and/or tunnel other players who scumread you, as you have done with me? or would a consistent approach attract too much unwanted attention?In post 372, Flea The Magician wrote: Yes, other players do have experience with me, and they're welcome to vote me and form opinions on my play style as they like. I will prod and poke back as appropriate. As far as today is concerned, you're my elimination of choice.
Ultimately, I get no sense from you that you've considered the alignment of any player in this game, including me. You haven't really commented on anyone else. If you're town, that's a problem. I'm baffled by your read on me, but regardless I don't think it's unreasonable for me to expect you to have reads on other players too. I've tried to encourage you to demonstrate you are town with a bit more than just the one-dimensional OMGUS - the opportunity to do so remains.