Ask Brian. I thought Peta was more subdued near EOD. But if I could identify a particular moment when it happened I have no idea.In post 6697, Dunnstral wrote:When did peta give up?
I also don't think he gave up. Merely weakened himself.
Ask Brian. I thought Peta was more subdued near EOD. But if I could identify a particular moment when it happened I have no idea.In post 6697, Dunnstral wrote:When did peta give up?
i meant more: look at it from who decided to try to take advantage of that. which names pop out?In post 6694, Bell wrote:This was short hand for a counter argument that was very ego-centric.In post 6692, skitter30 wrote:also, like, if this is the case (which i suspect), who does that point to over there?In post 6673, Bell wrote:Is it insane to think scum rushed Petapan to his death so we'd have less time over here?
The first thing I suspected when I saw Peta just croak that fast was that
they were worried you'd talk your way out and I'd identify you as town because I'm a town hunter to an extent.
But I also know that, that's fucking stupid.
It could be anything from taking the opportunity of a couple of town votes to push through Peta with a heavy scum presence in the other thread.
Also his sudden 'giving up'
is easily explained by the negative interactions with LLD and others, plus the general environment in that thread. There's a clear ethical component to toning down rhetoric and his own temper which weakens his edge which makes it easier to eliminate him. But he'd do it anyway given social context.
I was seeing if you had motivation to read me or not. This wasn't the townie answer, since you said as necessary rather than as appropriate or something to that effect. I just find it difficult to believe that anyone could be scum reading me with my posts.In post 6603, Brian Skies wrote:Why do I need to iso you?In post 6546, Bell wrote:@Brian, if you're town do you actually plan to iso me at some point and change your mind or is this more of a "as long as people are hard disagreeing with me, I won't push it, but I'm not going to change my mind and will yeet Bell at the first opportunity" sort of thing?
The rest is actually a pretty fair representation of my current stance on you. Although I do reserve the right to change my reads as I deem necessary.
I guess I'd like some more thoughts on these points, but a lot of them don't really sound proveable.In post 5992, Gypyx wrote:- positioning on annie / inconsistensyIn post 5987, Hench Princesses wrote:why?In post 5985, Gypyx wrote:well, pretty sure he's scum lol
- hyperagressiveness
- bad tone
- he feels highly like in a scumgamebi had with him
pedit : wdym?
His decision to vote Titus because he didn't want to read more Titus v Brian for the rest of the game gave me pause, but I probably would've hemmed and hawed about it for the rest of the game, so it's a very meh point for me. And he's trying to end what I want to end [A50], so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯.In post 6703, Bell wrote:I was reading back on Spiffeh's town read into scum read on Titus. It felt vaguely scummy.
In post 6702, skitter30 wrote:i meant more: look at it from who decided to try to take advantage of that. which names pop out?In post 6694, Bell wrote:This was short hand for a counter argument that was very ego-centric.In post 6692, skitter30 wrote:also, like, if this is the case (which i suspect), who does that point to over there?In post 6673, Bell wrote:Is it insane to think scum rushed Petapan to his death so we'd have less time over here?
The first thing I suspected when I saw Peta just croak that fast was that
they were worried you'd talk your way out and I'd identify you as town because I'm a town hunter to an extent.
But I also know that, that's fucking stupid.
It could be anything from taking the opportunity of a couple of town votes to push through Peta with a heavy scum presence in the other thread.
Also his sudden 'giving up'
is easily explained by the negative interactions with LLD and others, plus the general environment in that thread. There's a clear ethical component to toning down rhetoric and his own temper which weakens his edge which makes it easier to eliminate him. But he'd do it anyway given social context.
brian i'm not ignoring your post will get to it on a pc a little later
if you could go over why g ypyx is scum again as well that would be helpful
In post 6527, skitter30 wrote:gypyx can you also give me a quick tldr of your reads?In post 6523, Gypyx wrote:cool, happy to hear you're willing to take a step back on bell
well yeah there's scum outside of bowl for sure, but we have bowl as scum, why give him a pass on that one because we know there's more out of him (or there might not even be)
and like idk, you're really seeing bowl's progession on annie as possibly coming from town?
i'm gonna focus on this one because i think it's a bit more pressing and i don't think the annie wagon is gonna be functionally relevant in the next 24 hours and i don't think atm i have the energy for bothIn post 6705, Brian Skies wrote:I would say that, of the players in this thread, I feel like everyone else has consistently given flashes of town- or town-like-motivation.
I don't really get that with Gyx.
I feel like he's just been doing things, but not really in a town-motivated sort of way.
Like him asking to get neighborized because he feels like he can solve more there when he can just solve here, and he hasn't really been doing much in that regard while he has been here, doesn't give me the best impression of him. I also feel like most of his contributions are reliant on setup spec, which is very meh to me.
I still don't agree with Nacho regarding the fake-dayvig. Yes, he did pull back after Noraa reacted, but he didn't offer anything in the way of analysis until Nacho prodded him about it. And before Nacho engaged him, I don't think he was really engaging in meaningful conversation before that, so I disagree with the assessment that he has been comfortable in this thread (or at least not been uncomfortable).
I still think they were either excited or feigning excitement when Annie brought up the Split PT thing and think he was looking to have her run away with it before I made it apparent that I wasn't fond of Annie inserting that into the thread.
I know HP said they thought it may have been a 'townslip', but I'm actually not a fan of the 'Macho IC comment'. I feel like it's probable they were trying to fake a dumbtell in the event Bell is town here.
She's scum. Look at the way her reads turned.In post 6707, Bell wrote:In post 6702, skitter30 wrote:i meant more: look at it from who decided to try to take advantage of that. which names pop out?In post 6694, Bell wrote:This was short hand for a counter argument that was very ego-centric.In post 6692, skitter30 wrote:also, like, if this is the case (which i suspect), who does that point to over there?In post 6673, Bell wrote:Is it insane to think scum rushed Petapan to his death so we'd have less time over here?
The first thing I suspected when I saw Peta just croak that fast was that
they were worried you'd talk your way out and I'd identify you as town because I'm a town hunter to an extent.
But I also know that, that's fucking stupid.
It could be anything from taking the opportunity of a couple of town votes to push through Peta with a heavy scum presence in the other thread.
Also his sudden 'giving up'
is easily explained by the negative interactions with LLD and others, plus the general environment in that thread. There's a clear ethical component to toning down rhetoric and his own temper which weakens his edge which makes it easier to eliminate him. But he'd do it anyway given social context.
brian i'm not ignoring your post will get to it on a pc a little later
if you could go over why g ypyx is scum again as well that would be helpful
Cabd, Spiffeh.
I'm not sure if in a Cabd scum world it makes more sense that he didn't just fool Dunnstral or use LLD's read as an excuse to vote them rather than either or both of them being scum with him.
The problem is that he can get away with just that because I'm town reading him for some extremely clever posting if he's scum.In post 6711, skitter30 wrote:gypyx, bell, brian, sb9, can i interst any of you in voting dunn?
i think his push on me here is fairly bad given taht it seems to be entirely based on setup spec - he seems to think he can get away with a push using just that as reasoning and won't or can't elaborate in any fashion
In post 2926, Dunnstral wrote:This role name doesn't seem to mention the amnesiac or cross-thread parts of your role thoughIn post 2921, shellyc wrote:Forwards TENET Operative
In post 2949, Dunnstral wrote:If Operative is the name for a player, why is Shelly's role named "Operative"
In post 2952, Dunnstral wrote:In post 1, SirCakez wrote: 16. A sample VT role PM is below:Welcome to TENET SirCakezekaCriS TENET ot emocleW
You are a Forwards Tenet OperativevitarepO teneT sdrawroF a era uoY
Abilities
-You begin the game in the Forwards timestreamaertsemit sdrawroF eht ni emag eht nigeb uoY
-During the day, you may vote for whoever you want to eliminatetanimile ot tnaw uoy reveohw rof etov yam uoy ,yad eht gniruD
-You may Invert via a Turnstile by public votetov cilbup yb elitsnruT a aiv trevnI yam uoY
-You may enter the Purple Room each night by public votetov yb thgin hcae mooR elpruP eht retne yam uoY
If you invert, you will becomemoceb lliw uoy ,trevni uoy fI
Spoiler:
You win once all of thehave been eliminatedSator Operativesetanimile neeb evahsevitarepO rotaSeht fo lla ecno niw uoY
The forwards game thread is here: https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=85288:ereh si daerht emag sdrawrof ehT
The inverted game thread is here: https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=85289:ereh si daerht emag detrevni ehT
In post 2956, Dunnstral wrote:Doesn't really make senseIn post 2929, shellyc wrote:forwards tenet operative (modified follower)In post 2926, Dunnstral wrote:This role name doesn't seem to mention the amnesiac or cross-thread parts of your role though
this is my full name
It's like claiming Vanilla Town (modified follower)
In post 2959, Dunnstral wrote:But @TitusIn post 2956, Dunnstral wrote:Doesn't really make senseIn post 2929, shellyc wrote:forwards tenet operative (modified follower)In post 2926, Dunnstral wrote:This role name doesn't seem to mention the amnesiac or cross-thread parts of your role though
this is my full name
It's like claiming Vanilla Town (modified follower)
it's possible the role originally read Forwards Sator Operative (modified follower)
And they switched Sator with Tenet, without realizing that that made up the town vt role
In post 2982, Dunnstral wrote:Is this a change to your claimed role name?
I'm confused at why you quoted me. Also, please elaborate or direct me to the read switch and why the read switch is scummy.In post 6714, Dunnstral wrote:She's scum. Look at the way her reads turned.In post 6707, Bell wrote:In post 6702, skitter30 wrote:i meant more: look at it from who decided to try to take advantage of that. which names pop out?In post 6694, Bell wrote:This was short hand for a counter argument that was very ego-centric.In post 6692, skitter30 wrote:also, like, if this is the case (which i suspect), who does that point to over there?In post 6673, Bell wrote:Is it insane to think scum rushed Petapan to his death so we'd have less time over here?
The first thing I suspected when I saw Peta just croak that fast was that
they were worried you'd talk your way out and I'd identify you as town because I'm a town hunter to an extent.
But I also know that, that's fucking stupid.
It could be anything from taking the opportunity of a couple of town votes to push through Peta with a heavy scum presence in the other thread.
Also his sudden 'giving up'
is easily explained by the negative interactions with LLD and others, plus the general environment in that thread. There's a clear ethical component to toning down rhetoric and his own temper which weakens his edge which makes it easier to eliminate him. But he'd do it anyway given social context.
brian i'm not ignoring your post will get to it on a pc a little later
if you could go over why g ypyx is scum again as well that would be helpful
Cabd, Spiffeh.
I'm not sure if in a Cabd scum world it makes more sense that he didn't just fool Dunnstral or use LLD's read as an excuse to vote them rather than either or both of them being scum with him.
Who would you rather vote?In post 6708, Gypyx wrote:just, what's the skitter case apart setup spec? i don't see any other reason brought up and def won't vote there if there isn't more
I mean your probelm for making scummy looking pushes... you should have at least gone through the motions of pretending you actually had reasons before thisIn post 6717, Dunnstral wrote:I'm telling you that Skitter is scum and is trying to convince you
Her read switch is on me and you can see it for yourself, she thought I was the towniest person in this thread back when I was defending her and pushing you, and even upon coming to this thread. But now that it's obvious that my read isn't changing she pivoted to an ultra wifom team which should seem super unlikely if you think about it (you guys are seriously underselling Deacon hydra's capabilities as town here)
She is fear mongering by saying that I vote her and then you and then oh no both town
No, I'd go into the inverse (a50, pooky) firstIn post 6720, skitter30 wrote:is bell next y/n?
So why are you pushing me again?In post 6722, Dunnstral wrote:No, I'd go into the inverse (a50, pooky) firstIn post 6720, skitter30 wrote:is bell next y/n?