In post 1194, Rannygazoo wrote:So what are we going to do if the claim is proven false and then NM is like “LOL I TROL U, lemme make up another claim real quick”
You execute them.
Implying that if the neighborizer claim is false, you’re not going to put up with more BS.
Your current behavior with regards to something that was at-best antitown to mention at all doesn't really sit well with me.
Also yaaaaaay hella people are claiming D1 again. Good job, guys. You're really doing the job well here. [/sarcasm]
"Fuck you. I opened up my heart to you and you stabbed it a thousand times." - Gamma, to me, right before confessing to being the town vig and murdering my scum partner N1.
@chkflip I don’t think it’s anti-town to want to nail down a claim from someone who dodged an elim by claiming. I also think the tracker soft was obvious and if NM is town, scum was benefiting from it more because they can tell each other. If you want to talk about it more, we can, but I don’t think either of us wants that.
Except you have no way of knowing as Town if either Claim is true, but you know as Scum that one of them has to be true, if Not_Mafia is Town. So, how exactly would your position change if the Claim was narrowed down? Do you want to explain that?
If Not_Mafia is completely full of it, it would become obvious to a decent enough Town at some point. Either Claim, actually. That’s why I wasn’t worried about narrowing it down.
You can disagree with me about your newly shown antitown behavior, but that doesn't actually make it less antitown. Assuming scum saw, read, and discussed the claim actually gives me a whole hell of a lot less incentive to unvote you for what should be an obvious reason. But we can keep not talking about the thing you shouldn't have mentioned to begin with if that makes you feel better.
heybbmolla who hurt you
"Fuck you. I opened up my heart to you and you stabbed it a thousand times." - Gamma, to me, right before confessing to being the town vig and murdering my scum partner N1.
In post 1281, Andresvmb wrote:Except you have no way of knowing as Town if either Claim is true, but you know as Scum that one of them has to be true, if Not_Mafia is Town. So, how exactly would your position change if the Claim was narrowed down? Do you want to explain that?
Andres, maybe you know the other players here better than I do, but I don’t trust town to not let NM get away with switching claims unless I make noise about it.
In post 1281, Andresvmb wrote:Except you have no way of knowing as Town if either Claim is true, but you know as Scum that one of them has to be true, if Not_Mafia is Town. So, how exactly would your position change if the Claim was narrowed down? Do you want to explain that?
Andres, maybe you know the other players here better than I do, but I don’t trust town to not let NM get away with switching claims unless I make noise about it.
The problem I have is that your noise is at best completely useless today. And at worst, it’s Scum posturing. You can make all the noise you want right now. It’s worthless.
I don’t have a master plan. I didn’t know what to make of it. That’s why I asked an exploratory question. I wanted to discuss what it meant and how to proceed.
In post 1225, Rannygazoo wrote:Since we’re discussing NM’s claim in detail, what do you make of the tracker soft?
In post 1287, Rannygazoo wrote:I don’t have a master plan. I didn’t know what to make of it. That’s why I asked an exploratory question. I wanted to discuss what it meant and how to proceed.
In post 1225, Rannygazoo wrote:Since we’re discussing NM’s claim in detail, what do you make of the tracker soft?
You are still avoiding giving me a straight answer. Just sit down and think about it.
In post 1287, Rannygazoo wrote:I don’t have a master plan. I didn’t know what to make of it. That’s why I asked an exploratory question. I wanted to discuss what it meant and how to proceed.
In post 1225, Rannygazoo wrote:Since we’re discussing NM’s claim in detail, what do you make of the tracker soft?
You are still avoiding giving me a straight answer. Just sit down and think about it.
Sorry, I thought you were asking about my motive for bringing it up. You were asking for something completely different.
I would have less of a gut feeling that NM is setting up to dodge an elim with a claim for a second time.
I think you’ve grossly misjudged the benefit to you from getting this extra information, with the obvious benefit Scum would derive from the extra information. Why? I don’t know. I’m done debating this. Hopefully you understand why chkflip for example is being so cut and dry about it.
This is what you pick out of everything to comment on?
Also, what is Not_Mafia doing? This is some of the worst play I’ve ever seen.
I will SEARCH for games with you and N_M to help you policy him.
I can't remember the last N_M post that wasn't bland, unimaginative and lame. Some shitposters are at least somewhat funny. You are the epitomy of the type of poster that nobody would miss if you were to suddenly disappear. You never add anything of value.
Also, what is Not_Mafia doing? This is some of the worst play I’ve ever seen.
I will SEARCH for games with you and N_M to help you policy him.
I can't remember the last N_M post that wasn't bland, unimaginative and lame. Some shitposters are at least somewhat funny. You are the epitomy of the type of poster that nobody would miss if you were to suddenly disappear. You never add anything of value.
Also, what is Not_Mafia doing? This is some of the worst play I’ve ever seen.
I will SEARCH for games with you and N_M to help you policy him.
I can't remember the last N_M post that wasn't bland, unimaginative and lame. Some shitposters are at least somewhat funny. You are the epitomy of the type of poster that nobody would miss if you were to suddenly disappear. You never add anything of value.
Also, what is Not_Mafia doing? This is some of the worst play I’ve ever seen.
I will SEARCH for games with you and N_M to help you policy him.
I can't remember the last N_M post that wasn't bland, unimaginative and lame. Some shitposters are at least somewhat funny. You are the epitomy of the type of poster that nobody would miss if you were to suddenly disappear. You never add anything of value.
In post 1072, Hayker wrote:I strongly dislike posts like this. "everything I said is useful" Just insisting that ones own play is good. Never a good thing to see.
Are you trying to force yourself to scum read someone?
The Seinfeld-like observational comedians that were popular in the 90s and 2000s just spoke about things in their experience, and as they because successful, they traveled more and had to deal with airplanes more than the average person, so they always had something to say about airplane food. Nowadays airlines don’t serve meals as often, and airplane food has become a meta-joke.