Yes, this is definitely a game where scum aren't benefiting from inactionIn post 440, Raya36 wrote:I don't think jj's post was bad. Wouldn't scum being trying to push at least somebody? I don't see scum pointing out townreads but failing to scumread anyone.
Yeah but this is just wrong. Like, that's the wrong interpretation of that lmaoIn post 447, Smoke and Mirrors wrote:@bob, you’re saying that jjh having the remaining 7 slots as indistinguishable is possibly scum indicative. I’m saying it’s NAI because it is but I read the 5 townreads part as town indicative, which means I think it’s probably town indicative.
You’re very entertaining if albeit a bit strange.
Omg this is a fantastic postIn post 450, catboi wrote:Yes, this is definitely a game where scum aren't benefiting from inactionIn post 440, Raya36 wrote:I don't think jj's post was bad. Wouldn't scum being trying to push at least somebody? I don't see scum pointing out townreads but failing to scumread anyone.
Because scum want a miselim. If town is already pushing in that direction then sure, that's great. But scum still want some of their own scumreads so they can push something when on of their team is under suspicion.In post 442, wellermanbob wrote:Why?In post 440, Raya36 wrote:being trying to push at least somebody
That's also what I was thinking to failed to mentionIn post 444, Smoke and Mirrors wrote:I think the lack of scumreads part is NAI but that the number of townreads may be town indicative because scum doesn’t like to townread too many people.In post 440, Raya36 wrote:I don't think jj's post was bad. Wouldn't scum being trying to push at least somebody? I don't see scum pointing out townreads but failing to scumread anyone.
![:]](./images/smilies/icon_smiling.png "Cheerful Smile"){kind=icon}
Actually, scum don't need to do anything, simply not getting eliminated themselves is good enough. Giving the game a lack of momentum to actually get any elimination is good enough and right now there's a bunch of people who haven't really said much. But I guess I could just never vote and be the towniest town to you?In post 454, Raya36 wrote:Because scum want a miselim. If town is already pushing in that direction then sure, that's great. But scum still want some of their own scumreads so they can push something when on of their team is under suspicion.In post 442, wellermanbob wrote:Why?In post 440, Raya36 wrote:being trying to push at least somebody
Which of my takes were "safe", exactly, btw?In post 424, Infinity Zero wrote:VOTE: catboi
Their takes have been pretty safe, but I'm mostly just voting here because I don't like any of the other wagons. I'm also getting townvibes from raya, who's playing the polar opposite of a strategy that worked well for her as scum (lots of effort and nuance and aggression)
-Inf
But having scumreads can help them not get eliminated if momentum swings towards them. That's not close to the only thing I consider so it wouldn't make you the towniest to me.In post 459, catboi wrote:Actually, scum don't need to do anything, simply not getting eliminated themselves is good enough. Giving the game a lack of momentum to actually get any elimination is good enough and right now there's a bunch of people who haven't really said much. But I guess I could just never vote and be the towniest town to you?In post 454, Raya36 wrote:Because scum want a miselim. If town is already pushing in that direction then sure, that's great. But scum still want some of their own scumreads so they can push something when on of their team is under suspicion.In post 442, wellermanbob wrote:Why?In post 440, Raya36 wrote:being trying to push at least somebody
That's exactly what I saidIn post 407, catboi wrote:If you're referring to actual post count then you're just being flat-out dishonest. Most of his posts have been empty filler, I'd gauge two as having real reads that might be AI. I didn't like either of those. I don't necessarily want to eliminate someone just for having two posts I disagreed with, because that can easily happen with town and ideally I'd like to see him post more. But he is on the negative side of my read list and I would absolutely vote him if necessary. You come in with stuff like a very under-justified bob vote and suspecting chara for saying titus's claim wasn't a towntell, calling raya underwhelming, which, wile even if I disagree with her, doesn't really appear to be the case at all, and I don't know why you'd single Raya out vs anyone else, if anything she's slightly on the proactive side.
OopsIn post 464, Momrangal wrote:That's exactly what I saidIn post 407, catboi wrote:If you're referring to actual post count then you're just being flat-out dishonest. Most of his posts have been empty filler, I'd gauge two as having real reads that might be AI. I didn't like either of those. I don't necessarily want to eliminate someone just for having two posts I disagreed with, because that can easily happen with town and ideally I'd like to see him post more. But he is on the negative side of my read list and I would absolutely vote him if necessary. You come in with stuff like a very under-justified bob vote and suspecting chara for saying titus's claim wasn't a towntell, calling raya underwhelming, which, wile even if I disagree with her, doesn't really appear to be the case at all, and I don't know why you'd single Raya out vs anyone else, if anything she's slightly on the proactive side.
And I brought up Raya because someone asked me about Raya. I don't have an opinion on that slot at all
But you're voting someone who's fairly vocal and opinionated.In post 450, catboi wrote:Yes, this is definitely a game where scum aren't benefiting from inactionIn post 440, Raya36 wrote:I don't think jj's post was bad. Wouldn't scum being trying to push at least somebody? I don't see scum pointing out townreads but failing to scumread anyone.
I'm starting to take your stance against me, personally
Are you?In post 466, Twins Akari and Mara wrote:But you're voting someone who's fairly vocal and opinionated.In post 450, catboi wrote:Yes, this is definitely a game where scum aren't benefiting from inactionIn post 440, Raya36 wrote:I don't think jj's post was bad. Wouldn't scum being trying to push at least somebody? I don't see scum pointing out townreads but failing to scumread anyone.
