Quite often in fact, especially on days later than D1. A towncore without scum is quite easy to make if the town can identify other town as town, rather than identifying people who have similar takes as them as being town. (The latter is what lets deepscum infiltrate the town's core.)
In post 2914, OkaPoka wrote:@mastina who on my team should i trust the most for a second opinion
Honestly, depends. If Nancy has actually been actively following along this game and reading all of the pages rather than skimming/isoing, then her takes on some players are probably pretty good (Nancy should be able to tell this is my towngame for instance, and if she can't that alone is proof she's not reading in detail). But only IF she's actively been following along this game and reading all of the pages rather than skimming/isoing. If she's been skimming/isoing, less so.
If DKKoba treated this game like they were a replacement replacing in, then they could possibly be better, but given that DKKoba's style tends to be fairly reliant on getting reactions to their posts, you'd have needed to basically been their avatar, pushing their thoughts in and allowing them to get reactions to those thoughts. That dynamic absent, probably not DKKoba.
In general, I'd probably say Pooky's the best one to trust just generically so (Nancy could situationally be better, DKKoba also could situationally be better), so if neither of the situations I mentioned are true, then yeah, I'd trust Pooky the most, since Pooky as a player even when not heavily invested/involved still has fairly good takes/reads.