Agreeing with me is not explicitly scummy no. But the way you did it made it seem like you were jumping onto others' reads instead of forming your own opinions.In post 321, Duchess wrote:Can you explain why agreeing with you is scummy behaviour?
Yeah, I disagreed. Whemestar hadn't said enough in my opinion to warrant the read you gave on him about putting up an act.In post 321, Duchess wrote:As for my opinion of Whemestar, did you disagree at the time? This was the third page of the game, so of course I will not make any convictions or accusations as strong as those I hope to be capable of making later in the game.
I'm interested in hearing more of why you think Norfolk is the best shot here.In post 294, unwnd wrote:If he's scum then this is just his MO. You can't expect anything else out of him. He's a good shot to where you either start opening up the idea of bussing or he's a townie who becomes worse (no offense) later down the line
If I think about gamestate I'd actually say he makes the best shot reading back my own thoughts lol
How can you say they're out of their scum range if you don't know how they play?In post 315, Dunnstral wrote:MUSHAGANA feels like town/out of their scum range, but I don't know them or how they play. It just feels like this is them as town.
Just a feeling. This feels like a town playerIn post 328, Netflix and Chill wrote:How can you say they're out of their scum range if you don't know how they play?In post 315, Dunnstral wrote:MUSHAGANA feels like town/out of their scum range, but I don't know them or how they play. It just feels like this is them as town.
It's based on our discussion of how we should approach our first shot with the understanding of how the godfather functions in this setup and what happens should we shoot a goon.In post 329, unwnd wrote:Why do you disagree?
You said he was being LAMIST. That explicitly implies some kind of an act or show or desire to be seen.RLotus wrote:Agreeing with me is not explicitly scummy no. But the way you did it made it seem like you were jumping onto others' reads instead of forming your own opinions.In post 321, Duchess wrote:Can you explain why agreeing with you is scummy behaviour?
Yeah, I disagreed. Whemestar hadn't said enough in my opinion to warrant the read you gave on him about putting up an act.In post 321, Duchess wrote:As for my opinion of Whemestar, did you disagree at the time? This was the third page of the game, so of course I will not make any convictions or accusations as strong as those I hope to be capable of making later in the game.
This is a rather liberal interpretation, in my opinion.In post 170, SirCakez wrote:Another bad Norfolk postIn post 160, Norfolk Boy1 wrote:I'm not digging ScrewTheTells jumping in and claiming it's suspicious that i'm not posting when it's Sunday night in the UK.
Anyone suggesting a committee or that votes should decide the shot is a scum candidate for me.
The only confirmed town is Netflix, so Netflix should decide.
They're basically saying don't scumhunt, it's netflix's job.
This is one of the reasons I suspect Cakez.In post 333, Duchess wrote:This is a rather liberal interpretation, in my opinion.In post 170, SirCakez wrote:Another bad Norfolk postIn post 160, Norfolk Boy1 wrote:I'm not digging ScrewTheTells jumping in and claiming it's suspicious that i'm not posting when it's Sunday night in the UK.
Anyone suggesting a committee or that votes should decide the shot is a scum candidate for me.
The only confirmed town is Netflix, so Netflix should decide.
They're basically saying don't scumhunt, it's netflix's job.
Are there two players here you feel stronger about than the other two? Can you explain any of these reads or your townreads from the post before?In post 191, Rockhopper wrote:VOTE: ScrewTheTells
VOTE: Norfolk boy
VOTE: Not_Mafia
VOTE: SirCakez
Probably two scum in there
I don't know.In post 302, unwnd wrote:The newbie game we played he sorta just said 'yeah I'll self-vote to resolve myself' after being run up. Energy isn't something he relies upon, maybe that's evident in just his avatar alone. How do you think partners would be treating right now in a hypothetical situation of scum?
Norfolk's first post reads to me almost the same as when scum feigns confusion about a Night Kill upon day start. He is overcompensating in his next post in that he ignores the implication that Whemestar is casting suspicion his way, and instead casually replies as if he is known town. He made his first post, 3 people immediately condemned it, he realized how scummy it was, and then tried to throw in a fake townslip to compensate.In post 204, Imperium wrote:Where did he overcompensate and what was scummy on the surface?In post 52, Duchess wrote:To me Norfolk looks like he is overcompensating for something he did that he knows looks scummy on the surface, so I agree with both of you if that makes any sense. I also agree that Whemestar's eager attitude looks like an act to me.In post 37, RLotus wrote:Really? I think saying that you don't want the gun is scummy as opposed to towny, on the surface.In post 36, SirCakez wrote:Norfolk's posting just seemed excessively LAMIST to me
Whemstar who is asking to be shot is LAMIST in my mind.
I can understand your line of thinking here, sort of, but I don't agree.In post 339, Duchess wrote:Norfolk's first post reads to me almost the same as when scum feigns confusion about a Night Kill upon day start. He is overcompensating in his next post in that he ignores the implication that Whemestar is casting suspicion his way, and instead casually replies as if he is known town. He made his first post, 3 people immediately condemned it, he realized how scummy it was, and then tried to throw in a fake townslip to compensate.In post 204, Imperium wrote:Where did he overcompensate and what was scummy on the surface?In post 52, Duchess wrote:To me Norfolk looks like he is overcompensating for something he did that he knows looks scummy on the surface, so I agree with both of you if that makes any sense. I also agree that Whemestar's eager attitude looks like an act to me.In post 37, RLotus wrote:Really? I think saying that you don't want the gun is scummy as opposed to towny, on the surface.In post 36, SirCakez wrote:Norfolk's posting just seemed excessively LAMIST to me
Whemstar who is asking to be shot is LAMIST in my mind.
Several players seem to be appealing to you (to some degree) all at once, if that is what you are talking about. Otherwise I see Imperium keeping people accountable to their Norfolk Boy reads.In post 205, MUSHSHAGANA wrote:Albert, Duchess: I'd like your thoughts specifically on the posts between 180 and this post (most likely 205). Do you see what I see? Can you hear what I hear?
I'm not dropping any hints to avoid bias, but it's not information I care about keeping hidden. Either of you can answer openly if you spot it.
Which part do you disagree with; the comparison I made of his first post, or my interpretation of his second?In post 340, Imperium wrote:I can understand your line of thinking here, sort of, but I don't agree.In post 339, Duchess wrote:Norfolk's first post reads to me almost the same as when scum feigns confusion about a Night Kill upon day start. He is overcompensating in his next post in that he ignores the implication that Whemestar is casting suspicion his way, and instead casually replies as if he is known town. He made his first post, 3 people immediately condemned it, he realized how scummy it was, and then tried to throw in a fake townslip to compensate.In post 204, Imperium wrote:Where did he overcompensate and what was scummy on the surface?In post 52, Duchess wrote:To me Norfolk looks like he is overcompensating for something he did that he knows looks scummy on the surface, so I agree with both of you if that makes any sense. I also agree that Whemestar's eager attitude looks like an act to me.In post 37, RLotus wrote:Really? I think saying that you don't want the gun is scummy as opposed to towny, on the surface.In post 36, SirCakez wrote:Norfolk's posting just seemed excessively LAMIST to me
Whemstar who is asking to be shot is LAMIST in my mind.
I just didn't interpret either that way.In post 343, Duchess wrote:Which part do you disagree with; the comparison I made of his first post, or my interpretation of his second?In post 340, Imperium wrote:I can understand your line of thinking here, sort of, but I don't agree.In post 339, Duchess wrote:Norfolk's first post reads to me almost the same as when scum feigns confusion about a Night Kill upon day start. He is overcompensating in his next post in that he ignores the implication that Whemestar is casting suspicion his way, and instead casually replies as if he is known town. He made his first post, 3 people immediately condemned it, he realized how scummy it was, and then tried to throw in a fake townslip to compensate.In post 204, Imperium wrote:Where did he overcompensate and what was scummy on the surface?In post 52, Duchess wrote:To me Norfolk looks like he is overcompensating for something he did that he knows looks scummy on the surface, so I agree with both of you if that makes any sense. I also agree that Whemestar's eager attitude looks like an act to me.In post 37, RLotus wrote:Really? I think saying that you don't want the gun is scummy as opposed to towny, on the surface.In post 36, SirCakez wrote:Norfolk's posting just seemed excessively LAMIST to me
Whemstar who is asking to be shot is LAMIST in my mind.
And then there's people like Gypyx in Tenet who are so heavily coached and have their posts approved by their scum team that they escape notice because they don't look anything like they usually look as scum.In post 346, Duchess wrote:I disagree heavily with that take. I am willing to go out on a limb and say that most mafiosi write their own posts.