Large Normal 231 | Etymologies | Game Over

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #4025 (ISO) » Tue Jan 26, 2021 11:06 am

In post 3954, NorwegianboyEE wrote:What is that supposed to mean?
Do you think Lazy roleblocker is legit a scum role?

That or chkflip’s claim, though why are you being so biased against DGB? Titus isn’t right about you, is she?

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #4026 (ISO) » Tue Jan 26, 2021 11:06 am

In post 4024, chkflip wrote:Now, to go back and reply to the things that piqued my interest WHILE I WAS FUCKING ASLEEP.

Your attending to biological requirements is forgiven.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #4027 (ISO) » Tue Jan 26, 2021 11:07 am

Am I wrong on flip and the scum is Titus and Gamma?

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #4028 (ISO) » Tue Jan 26, 2021 11:08 am

In post 3967, NorwegianboyEE wrote:The thing about DGB is that their role just seems town.
We know for a fact that it's an lazy roleblocker, because Binatog hard confirms it. So why would scum have a modifier that makes their roleblocker suck if town PR's start blasting them and RB is only player left? Why have negative utility for a scum role when town is so stacked with PR's?

In post 3968, NorwegianboyEE wrote:It makes a lot more sense that lazy roleblocker exists to cause trouble for the scum team, but when scum only has 1 player left then the town roleblocker is deactivated to give scum an chance.

In post 3969, NorwegianboyEE wrote:This is like setup balancing 101 guys, come on.

So why was your first suggestion that I thought DGB was the scum PR?

chkflip · Post Post #4029 (ISO) » Tue Jan 26, 2021 11:08 am

Mm, Goof. I get a little snippy below and now I feel a little bad but the sentiment remains regardless of colorful language.

In post 3986, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Titus/Chkflip are super likely based on Chkflips defense of Titus and calling them Vanilla here. It's probably a fake result on their buddy.

How have I defended Titus, precisely?

> I gave VCA a chance yesterday because, believe it or not, it *CAN* and *HAS* worked in games ad nauseum (why else would it exist if it didn't work for towns?).

As a point of fact, there's an outlier from yesterday's VCA that flew under the radar to the point where they didn't even get votes. We'll call back to this shortly.

> I've been very vocal about how I didn't SEE or BELIEVE that Andres could be scum from a Plus town flip via Titus' VCA. I'd go so far as to say this isn't what defending an alleged partner looks like, hm?

I have town read Titus, not defended them. Significant difference.

In post 3994, Titus wrote:How about I legit am right?

I think you may have been, but we ignored it.

In post 3997, Vaxkiller wrote:VOTE: momrangle

What the fuck?

In post 4002, DrippingGoofball wrote:

He claimed vanilla cop, a role that is a
subset
of rolecop.

He won't name his modifier and refuses to explain why.

I have not noticed a list of all his night choices. Did I miss it?

I don't believe I was specific.
I haven't named it, correct. Saying I refused is blatantly exaggerating. Again.
And that's not even fucking true, bud. Shocking.

In post 4011, Titus wrote:Chkflip is cleared by my VCA.

Verbiage. I'm not confirmed anything, please don't push the narrative otherwise.

But hey, let's fix this.

VOTE: Hayker

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #4030 (ISO) » Tue Jan 26, 2021 11:10 am

In post 3997, Vaxkiller wrote:VOTE: momrangle

Shit vote

NorwegianboyEE · Post Post #4031 (ISO) » Tue Jan 26, 2021 11:12 am

In post 4025, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 3954, NorwegianboyEE wrote:What is that supposed to mean?
Do you think Lazy roleblocker is legit a scum role?
That or chkflip’s claim, though why are you being so biased against DGB? Titus isn’t right about you, is she?

No. And why do you call it bias, do you disagree with facts and logic?

In post 4028, Gamma Emerald wrote: So why was your first suggestion that I thought DGB was the scum PR?

Where i'd say that? NGL i might change my stance based on impulse because i notice some things or i see things from an different perspective. So can you quote where i said whatever you're saying if you need me to explain my mindset?

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #4032 (ISO) » Tue Jan 26, 2021 11:14 am

I’m kinda trying to pull off “American neutrality” here until I get certain questions answered

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #4033 (ISO) » Tue Jan 26, 2021 11:36 am

so like, I'm gonna poke at people who hold stances I'm concerned about but I'm also trying to not be overt about what my own stances are.

NorwegianboyEE · Post Post #4034 (ISO) » Tue Jan 26, 2021 11:42 am

Where is Luca yo

NorwegianboyEE · Post Post #4035 (ISO) » Tue Jan 26, 2021 11:43 am

And i think it'd be better for Vax to just explain what they were doing, asking people to put their vote on Momrangal for an undisclosed reason is helpful how?

Mizzytastic · Post Post #4036 (ISO) » Tue Jan 26, 2021 12:16 pm

Hayker

has been prodded.

chkflip · Post Post #4037 (ISO) » Tue Jan 26, 2021 1:05 pm

Happy birthday, moderator. <3

NorwegianboyEE · Post Post #4038 (ISO) » Tue Jan 26, 2021 1:30 pm

Vaxkiller i see you online periodically. Can you help me understand what you’re up to.

BBmolla · Post Post #4039 (ISO) » Tue Jan 26, 2021 2:16 pm

I’m kind of content to sheep mom cause idk wtf is happening tbh

BBmolla · Post Post #4040 (ISO) » Tue Jan 26, 2021 2:16 pm

Hope you’re okay Titus

chkflip · Post Post #4041 (ISO) » Tue Jan 26, 2021 2:37 pm

In post 4038, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Vaxkiller i see you online periodically. Can you help me understand what you’re up to.

Surely I hope you know "they're online but not posting" is not a tell, correct? I'm saying neither that's your implication here, nor would I be opposed to it from a certain PoE, but only that it isn't exactly a fair shake to say anything about someone's presense online until they've become a point of contention in an active lurk way that swooped way under everyone.

Oh, speaking of Hayker.

Why haven't we eliminated there?

chkflip · Post Post #4042 (ISO) » Tue Jan 26, 2021 2:40 pm

Like

Post stamps. Time of wagon D1. Voting pattern. Bus vote. It was PlusJOYED/Hayker and we went the wrong way, guys. There's no way this lurksack shit isn't intentional.

Whomever is town casing Hayker: fucking WHY? Talk to me.

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #4043 (ISO) » Tue Jan 26, 2021 3:11 pm

tbh I wouldn't be wholly against voting hayker

Vaxkiller · Post Post #4044 (ISO) » Tue Jan 26, 2021 3:14 pm

In post 4038, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Vaxkiller i see you online periodically. Can you help me understand what you’re up to.

I work in IT. It's the busy time ATM, but I still have a mafiascum tab up most of the day. I will sometimes check in and read a little. My posting style (times that I post) has changed due to this busy time (before I would just post all day during work).

Why did you ask this question?

Andresvmb · Post Post #4045 (ISO) » Tue Jan 26, 2021 5:13 pm

Where is the vote right now? I do think Gamma’s posting right now (like throwing Hayker out there as an alternative for a vote) is Scummy.

I will maintain that the execution today should be in {chkflip, Titus}. I’m okay with either one.

Luca Blight · Post Post #4046 (ISO) » Tue Jan 26, 2021 5:20 pm

I agree that it should be between Titus/chkflip today.

I would like to see some content from Hayker, though.

chkflip · Post Post #4047 (ISO) » Tue Jan 26, 2021 5:40 pm

It's cute to me because neither of you have done much at all in the way of actually engaging me. Just zOMG cop claim, eliminate the cop? The logic train seems to have left the station.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #4048 (ISO) » Tue Jan 26, 2021 5:42 pm

"cop" is an overstatement.

chkflip · Post Post #4049 (ISO) » Tue Jan 26, 2021 5:47 pm

Am I supposed to be moved here, Goofball?

Because one of us has a chain of night actions that actually makes sense for my role and alignment, whereas you... are a Goofball.

And here I've seen zero defense for Hayker because it's fucking indefensible. So can we stop pointing fingers at one another and eliminate scum?