I was just trying to make it clear who I was talking aboutIn post 146, Daenerys and Dragons wrote:Why specifically for shadow, as your post seems to imply?In post 144, Infinity 324 wrote:Just cause I see how someone could think thatIn post 129, Daenerys and Dragons wrote:Why is it NAI in this case?
Can you respond to my second question as well?
- Daenerys
ShadowIn post 127, Dumb and Dumber wrote:Murdercat was this abt me or shadowslug?In post 110, MURDERCAT wrote:Can we talk more about skitter instead
in this post, i read this as infinity saying my read on yyotta was based on feeling that she was 'vibing in the early game and therefore she's town', but that's not what my yyotta read was based on (it was, however, similar to the reasoning i gave for lilith, which is why i asked who he was talking abt in that post)In post 60, Infinity 324 wrote:I'm skeptical of "this person is vibing in the early game therefore they're town" reads, they may work for some people but in general I haven't found them to be accurate.
Missed thisIn post 142, Infinity 324 wrote:Shadow, why was lilith saying "can we talk about" in 116 scummy but murder saying "can we talk about skitter" not?
Perhaps our styles are more similar than I realizedIn post 152, Dumb and Dumber wrote:making vague declarative statements without further elaboration
This isn't really what I was doing but that's okIn post 154, shadowslug wrote:he thinks there might be value in pushing skitter a bit and seemed content with letting that play out and didn't like you guys switching focus
I like shadow for town, this post and 149 feel like trying to explain gut readsIn post 154, shadowslug wrote:Missed thisIn post 142, Infinity 324 wrote:Shadow, why was lilith saying "can we talk about" in 116 scummy but murder saying "can we talk about skitter" not?
Uhh I missed this actually, but I don't mind Murder since he thinks there might be value in pushing skitter a bit and seemed content with letting that play out and didn't like you guys switching focus
~ skitterIn post 59, Dumb and Dumber wrote:@infinity i have exactly no meta on yyotta but it doesnt feel like a post scum makes
Questioning your read why? Because it seems so easy? that's bullcrap reasoningIn post 159, Green Crayons wrote:You literally quoted a post where I am questioning my read.
To explain this better, I feel like scum would feel more obligated to address the apparent "contradiction" I brought up in 142 but instead he's just saying what he thinksIn post 160, Infinity 324 wrote:this post and 149 feel like trying to explain gut reads
LolIn post 162, Dumb and Dumber wrote:~ skitterIn post 59, Dumb and Dumber wrote:@infinity i have exactly no meta on yyotta but it doesnt feel like a post scum makes
VOTE: GCIn post 148, Green Crayons wrote:^^^ that’s probably town sort mentality even if it’s wrong on me and prob shadow
Why is it bullcrap?In post 163, shadowslug wrote:Questioning your read why? Because it seems so easy? that's bullcrap reasoningIn post 159, Green Crayons wrote:You literally quoted a post where I am questioning my read.
Don’t see how 154 isn’t exactly what you said it isn’t.In post 164, Infinity 324 wrote:To explain this better, I feel like scum would feel more obligated to address the apparent "contradiction" I brought up in 142 but instead he's just saying what he thinksIn post 160, Infinity 324 wrote:this post and 149 feel like trying to explain gut reads
Using words gang
My post is developing my thoughts.In post 169, shadowslug wrote:If it feels like there may be a flaw in your read then that's worth pursuing
But rather than question/make a post that would further develop your thoughts you choose to post a "Hmm guys Im totally reconsidering rn"
Ur being scummy
Early town reads are good. Calling early town reads scummy is scummyIn post 169, shadowslug wrote:If it feels like there may be a flaw in your read then that's worth pursuing
But rather than question/make a post that would further develop your thoughts you choose to post a "Hmm guys Im totally reconsidering rn"
Ur being scummy
The best way I can explain it is that it's framed as "here's what I thought about murder" and not "here's why I'm not contradicting myself"In post 170, Green Crayons wrote:Don’t see how 154 isn’t exactly what you said it isn’t.
I don’t think 154 is indicative either way but I’m not seeing how it assuages concerns.