And what posts of mine gave you this impression? What's the distinction?In post 172, Green Crayons wrote:I don’t have to engage you when others are doing it.
My 133 is flagging that maybe you’re just playing like a bad new town player instead of a scum new player.
Open 805 Panic Room Day 1
Forum rules
- shadowslug
-
shadowslug Goon
- shadowslug
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 251
- Joined: January 16, 2021
- MURDERCAT
-
MURDERCAT he/himSurvivor
- MURDERCAT
he/him- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11704
- Joined: March 18, 2016
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Chicago
Oh I misread ignore meIn post 173, MURDERCAT wrote:Early town reads are good. Calling early town reads scummy is scummy- shadowslug
-
shadowslug Goon
- shadowslug
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 251
- Joined: January 16, 2021
NubIn post 176, MURDERCAT wrote:
Oh I misread ignore meIn post 173, MURDERCAT wrote:Early town reads are good. Calling early town reads scummy is scummy- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
It’s there in the thread. I reacted to your posts in real time.In post 175, shadowslug wrote:
And what posts of mine gave you this impression? What's the distinction?In post 172, Green Crayons wrote:I don’t have to engage you when others are doing it.
My 133 is flagging that maybe you’re just playing like a bad new town player instead of a scum new player.
The distinction is hard to figure out!"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- shadowslug
-
shadowslug Goon
- shadowslug
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 251
- Joined: January 16, 2021
Thanks, I agree with youIn post 168, Dumb and Dumber wrote:i don't fully know how to explain that one, it just doesn't
it's just like a little too 'bold' for (newb) scum to make i think; scum would have to feel p darn comfortable to have an entrance like that, and i'm not sure i see it
~ skitter- shadowslug
-
shadowslug Goon
- shadowslug
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 251
- Joined: January 16, 2021
In post 139, Green Crayons wrote:Avoiding (twice!) the question while attacking the player questioning your behavior is very new player scum behavior.In post 141, Green Crayons wrote:Very “new player scum behavior”
Not
“Very new player” scum behavior
you make this series of posts after the "scrunching my nose" postIn post 148, Green Crayons wrote:^^^ that’s probably town sort mentality even if it’s wrong on me and prob shadow
So you're questioning your read while directly contradicting people that say I'm townie- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
So is your problem that I'm too certain in my read or that I'm conflicted?
You're going to have to settle on which one you want to say makes me scum so you can finally finish this tiresome windup."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
Why this vote?In post 82, Dumb and Dumber wrote:Right its 6 and not 5 to flip, i was thinking 5 for some reason
VOTE: infinity
~ skitter
Pedit i thought was a reaction to ur recent posting from just now"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- MURDERCAT
-
MURDERCAT he/himSurvivor
- MURDERCAT
he/him- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11704
- Joined: March 18, 2016
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Chicago
- PenguinPower
-
PenguinPower He/Him.peng
- PenguinPower
He/Him- .peng
- .peng
- Posts: 22435
- Joined: June 15, 2016
- Pronoun: He/Him
- MURDERCAT
-
MURDERCAT he/himSurvivor
- MURDERCAT
he/him- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11704
- Joined: March 18, 2016
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Chicago
- shadowslug
-
shadowslug Goon
- shadowslug
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 251
- Joined: January 16, 2021
My problem is you jump from confident to conflicted in a way that doesn't look realIn post 182, Green Crayons wrote:So is your problem that I'm too certain in my read or that I'm conflicted?
You're going to have to settle on which one you want to say makes me scum so you can finally finish this tiresome windup.
You're conflicted one moment then shooting people down who say i'm town the next
You're "seems too easy" post seems fake in light of the posts comingdirectly after itthat imply you think i'm just scum- Dumb and Dumber
-
Dumb and Dumber Goon
- Dumb and Dumber
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 781
- Joined: June 25, 2020
I didnt like him asking if he was scummy here
I also felt like this was bad timing for a lilith vote (as i think she waa fairly town for her / hadnt done anything scummy just then. And i kinda think he should be giving my lilith read some level of credence but perhaps that is too egocentric of me to expect, esp. at this stage)
But then ir was clarified that this was a clarification of his earlier dnd vote, so i didnt mind it as much
~ skitter- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
ty skitter
any thoughts about this?
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Dumb and Dumber
-
Dumb and Dumber Goon
- Dumb and Dumber
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 781
- Joined: June 25, 2020
- Dumb and Dumber
-
Dumb and Dumber Goon
- Dumb and Dumber
- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
That's fair. I happen to think you're pretty town after 188.
I wanted to see who all was voting infinity and that took me to you. I agree with your initial reaction to 56 (but I think ultimately that Q doesn't come from scum). The rest of your 188 doesn't really matter to me as a matter of substance, but seems like a sufficiently just-complex-enough-but-simple-too explanation to read fairly natural."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Dumb and Dumber
-
Dumb and Dumber Goon
- Dumb and Dumber
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 781
- Joined: June 25, 2020
Perfect.In post 192, Green Crayons wrote:That's fair. I happen to think you're pretty town after 188
-Dumbass- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
idk you're the one who thinks he's town, I just wanted to see if you saw anything wrong with it.In post 190, Dumb and Dumber wrote:Maybe i should but i dont really
It's a combo of all three points that I think is scummy:
I don't like that he unvotes insanity after that wagon gets 4 votes (esp. now I have good town feelings about insanity)
AND
I don't like that he throws suspicion at another player while unvoting
AND
I don't like that he doesn't vote to either replace his insanity vote or to follow through on his suspicion"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
This half is possibly scum tho.In post 193, Dumb and Dumber wrote:
Perfect.In post 192, Green Crayons wrote:That's fair. I happen to think you're pretty town after 188
-Dumbass"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
insanity = infinityIn post 194, Green Crayons wrote:
idk you're the one who thinks he's town, I just wanted to see if you saw anything wrong with it.In post 190, Dumb and Dumber wrote:Maybe i should but i dont really
It's a combo of all three points that I think is scummy:
I don't like that he unvotes insanity after that wagon gets 4 votes (esp. now I have good town feelings about insanity)
AND
I don't like that he throws suspicion at another player while unvoting
AND
I don't like that he doesn't vote to either replace his insanity vote or to follow through on his suspicion"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- MURDERCAT
-
MURDERCAT he/himSurvivor
- MURDERCAT
he/him- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11704
- Joined: March 18, 2016
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Chicago
Can you say more about thisIn post 194, Green Crayons wrote:I don't like that he unvotes insanity after that wagon gets 4 votes (esp. now I have good town feelings about insanity)- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
which part, the unvote or the good vibes?"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- PenguinPower
-
PenguinPower He/Him.peng
- PenguinPower
He/Him- .peng
- .peng
- Posts: 22435
- Joined: June 15, 2016
- Pronoun: He/Him
- PenguinPower
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
- Green Crayons
- MURDERCAT
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Dumb and Dumber
- Green Crayons
- Dumb and Dumber
- Green Crayons
- Dumb and Dumber
- shadowslug
- MURDERCAT
- PenguinPower
- MURDERCAT
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- shadowslug
- shadowslug
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- shadowslug
- MURDERCAT
- shadowslug