Open 805 Panic Room Day 1


Forum rules
User avatar
shadowslug
shadowslug
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
shadowslug
Goon
Goon
Posts: 251
Joined: January 16, 2021

Post Post #175 (ISO) » Sun Jan 31, 2021 4:01 pm

Post by shadowslug »

In post 172, Green Crayons wrote:I don’t have to engage you when others are doing it.

My 133 is flagging that maybe you’re just playing like a bad new town player instead of a scum new player.
And what posts of mine gave you this impression? What's the distinction?
User avatar
MURDERCAT
MURDERCAT
he/him
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
MURDERCAT
he/him
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 11704
Joined: March 18, 2016
Pronoun: he/him
Location: Chicago

Post Post #176 (ISO) » Sun Jan 31, 2021 4:01 pm

Post by MURDERCAT »

In post 173, MURDERCAT wrote:Early town reads are good. Calling early town reads scummy is scummy
Oh I misread ignore me
GTKAMURDERCAT

Retired from playing, find me on discord
User avatar
shadowslug
shadowslug
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
shadowslug
Goon
Goon
Posts: 251
Joined: January 16, 2021

Post Post #177 (ISO) » Sun Jan 31, 2021 4:02 pm

Post by shadowslug »

In post 176, MURDERCAT wrote:
In post 173, MURDERCAT wrote:Early town reads are good. Calling early town reads scummy is scummy
Oh I misread ignore me
Nub
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #178 (ISO) » Sun Jan 31, 2021 4:02 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

I got you, infinity.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #179 (ISO) » Sun Jan 31, 2021 4:03 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 175, shadowslug wrote:
In post 172, Green Crayons wrote:I don’t have to engage you when others are doing it.

My 133 is flagging that maybe you’re just playing like a bad new town player instead of a scum new player.
And what posts of mine gave you this impression? What's the distinction?
It’s there in the thread. I reacted to your posts in real time.

The distinction is hard to figure out!
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
shadowslug
shadowslug
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
shadowslug
Goon
Goon
Posts: 251
Joined: January 16, 2021

Post Post #180 (ISO) » Sun Jan 31, 2021 4:06 pm

Post by shadowslug »

In post 168, Dumb and Dumber wrote:i don't fully know how to explain that one, it just doesn't

it's just like a little too 'bold' for (newb) scum to make i think; scum would have to feel p darn comfortable to have an entrance like that, and i'm not sure i see it

~ skitter
Thanks, I agree with you
User avatar
shadowslug
shadowslug
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
shadowslug
Goon
Goon
Posts: 251
Joined: January 16, 2021

Post Post #181 (ISO) » Sun Jan 31, 2021 4:34 pm

Post by shadowslug »

In post 139, Green Crayons wrote:Avoiding (twice!) the question while attacking the player questioning your behavior is very new player scum behavior.
In post 141, Green Crayons wrote:Very “new player scum behavior”

Not

“Very new player” scum behavior
In post 148, Green Crayons wrote:^^^ that’s probably town sort mentality even if it’s wrong on me and prob shadow
you make this series of posts after the "scrunching my nose" post

So you're questioning your read while directly contradicting people that say I'm townie
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #182 (ISO) » Sun Jan 31, 2021 4:38 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

So is your problem that I'm too certain in my read or that I'm conflicted?

You're going to have to settle on which one you want to say makes me scum so you can finally finish this tiresome windup.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #183 (ISO) » Sun Jan 31, 2021 4:39 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 82, Dumb and Dumber wrote:Right its 6 and not 5 to flip, i was thinking 5 for some reason

VOTE: infinity

~ skitter

Pedit i thought was a reaction to ur recent posting from just now
Why this vote?
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
MURDERCAT
MURDERCAT
he/him
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
MURDERCAT
he/him
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 11704
Joined: March 18, 2016
Pronoun: he/him
Location: Chicago

Post Post #184 (ISO) » Sun Jan 31, 2021 4:40 pm

Post by MURDERCAT »

PP how are you reading slug right now?
GTKAMURDERCAT

Retired from playing, find me on discord
User avatar
PenguinPower
PenguinPower
He/Him
.peng
User avatar
User avatar
PenguinPower
He/Him
.peng
.peng
Posts: 22435
Joined: June 15, 2016
Pronoun: He/Him

Post Post #185 (ISO) » Sun Jan 31, 2021 4:44 pm

Post by PenguinPower »

Scummy but that’s probably influenced somewhat by nai things. I disagree with skitter assessment and the agreement post was gross.

Wouldn’t be sad if he was yeeted, but it’s early.
<(") | (")>
User avatar
MURDERCAT
MURDERCAT
he/him
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
MURDERCAT
he/him
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 11704
Joined: March 18, 2016
Pronoun: he/him
Location: Chicago

Post Post #186 (ISO) » Sun Jan 31, 2021 4:46 pm

Post by MURDERCAT »

Hmm ok
GTKAMURDERCAT

Retired from playing, find me on discord
User avatar
shadowslug
shadowslug
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
shadowslug
Goon
Goon
Posts: 251
Joined: January 16, 2021

Post Post #187 (ISO) » Sun Jan 31, 2021 4:49 pm

Post by shadowslug »

In post 182, Green Crayons wrote:So is your problem that I'm too certain in my read or that I'm conflicted?

You're going to have to settle on which one you want to say makes me scum so you can finally finish this tiresome windup.
My problem is you jump from confident to conflicted in a way that doesn't look real

You're conflicted one moment then shooting people down who say i'm town the next

You're "seems too easy" post seems fake in light of the posts coming
directly after it
that imply you think i'm just scum
User avatar
Dumb and Dumber
Dumb and Dumber
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Dumb and Dumber
Goon
Goon
Posts: 781
Joined: June 25, 2020

Post Post #188 (ISO) » Sun Jan 31, 2021 4:49 pm

Post by Dumb and Dumber »

In post 56, Infinity 324 wrote:
In post 52, PenguinPower wrote:Hi!

What’s wrong the infinity votes?
Am I scummy?

Also lol yvotta

Skitter do you have meta on yvotta?
I didnt like him asking if he was scummy here
In post 71, Infinity 324 wrote:VOTE: daenerys
I also felt like this was bad timing for a lilith vote (as i think she waa fairly town for her / hadnt done anything scummy just then. And i kinda think he should be giving my lilith read some level of credence but perhaps that is too egocentric of me to expect, esp. at this stage)

But then ir was clarified that this was a clarification of his earlier dnd vote, so i didnt mind it as much

~ skitter
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #189 (ISO) » Sun Jan 31, 2021 4:54 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

ty skitter

any thoughts about this?
In post 90, shadowslug wrote:i like skitter but they seem kinda nervous right now

UNVOTE:
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Dumb and Dumber
Dumb and Dumber
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Dumb and Dumber
Goon
Goon
Posts: 781
Joined: June 25, 2020

Post Post #190 (ISO) » Sun Jan 31, 2021 4:59 pm

Post by Dumb and Dumber »

Not particularly

Maybe i should but i dont really

Gc the thought has crossed my mind that u may be trying to buddy me

~ skitter
User avatar
Dumb and Dumber
Dumb and Dumber
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Dumb and Dumber
Goon
Goon
Posts: 781
Joined: June 25, 2020

Post Post #191 (ISO) » Sun Jan 31, 2021 5:03 pm

Post by Dumb and Dumber »

Yo yo yo whadduuuuuup my glip glops

-Dumbass
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #192 (ISO) » Sun Jan 31, 2021 5:05 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

That's fair. I happen to think you're pretty town after 188.

I wanted to see who all was voting infinity and that took me to you. I agree with your initial reaction to 56 (but I think ultimately that Q doesn't come from scum). The rest of your 188 doesn't really matter to me as a matter of substance, but seems like a sufficiently just-complex-enough-but-simple-too explanation to read fairly natural.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Dumb and Dumber
Dumb and Dumber
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Dumb and Dumber
Goon
Goon
Posts: 781
Joined: June 25, 2020

Post Post #193 (ISO) » Sun Jan 31, 2021 5:06 pm

Post by Dumb and Dumber »

In post 192, Green Crayons wrote:That's fair. I happen to think you're pretty town after 188
Perfect.

-Dumbass
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #194 (ISO) » Sun Jan 31, 2021 5:07 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 190, Dumb and Dumber wrote:Maybe i should but i dont really
idk you're the one who thinks he's town, I just wanted to see if you saw anything wrong with it.

It's a combo of all three points that I think is scummy:

I don't like that he unvotes insanity after that wagon gets 4 votes (esp. now I have good town feelings about insanity)
AND
I don't like that he throws suspicion at another player while unvoting
AND
I don't like that he doesn't vote to either replace his insanity vote or to follow through on his suspicion
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #195 (ISO) » Sun Jan 31, 2021 5:07 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 193, Dumb and Dumber wrote:
In post 192, Green Crayons wrote:That's fair. I happen to think you're pretty town after 188
Perfect.

-Dumbass
This half is possibly scum tho.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #196 (ISO) » Sun Jan 31, 2021 5:08 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 194, Green Crayons wrote:
In post 190, Dumb and Dumber wrote:Maybe i should but i dont really
idk you're the one who thinks he's town, I just wanted to see if you saw anything wrong with it.

It's a combo of all three points that I think is scummy:

I don't like that he unvotes insanity after that wagon gets 4 votes (esp. now I have good town feelings about insanity)
AND
I don't like that he throws suspicion at another player while unvoting
AND
I don't like that he doesn't vote to either replace his insanity vote or to follow through on his suspicion
insanity = infinity
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
MURDERCAT
MURDERCAT
he/him
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
MURDERCAT
he/him
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 11704
Joined: March 18, 2016
Pronoun: he/him
Location: Chicago

Post Post #197 (ISO) » Sun Jan 31, 2021 5:09 pm

Post by MURDERCAT »

In post 194, Green Crayons wrote:I don't like that he unvotes insanity after that wagon gets 4 votes (esp. now I have good town feelings about insanity)
Can you say more about this
GTKAMURDERCAT

Retired from playing, find me on discord
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #198 (ISO) » Sun Jan 31, 2021 5:10 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

which part, the unvote or the good vibes?
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
PenguinPower
PenguinPower
He/Him
.peng
User avatar
User avatar
PenguinPower
He/Him
.peng
.peng
Posts: 22435
Joined: June 15, 2016
Pronoun: He/Him

Post Post #199 (ISO) » Sun Jan 31, 2021 5:10 pm

Post by PenguinPower »

I like crayons.
<(") | (")>
Locked