"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
In post 529, Gamma Emerald wrote:This interaction between lilith and auro seems rather pointless
Concur.
Any feelings re cat's recent posts?
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
I think newbscum is more likely to be lost/confused in the early game than newbtown, she's also been asking a bunch of questions that haven't really led anywhere yet.
In post 533, Infinity 324 wrote:I think newbscum is more likely to be lost/confused in the early game than newbtown, she's also been asking a bunch of questions that haven't really led anywhere yet.
I think her drop in activity might explain the latter. Fair enough otherwise.
Gamma Emerald wrote:
Still just feels like nonsense non-content
Yup - were you expecting any other answer here, GC?
cat's recent play is pointedly suspicious or anti-town to the point I'm fancying that it's a purposeful strategy
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
skitter you know i love you and i think you’re great. this isn’t personal.
@whoever is interested: skitter is within top 3 players onsite with ability to read me. probably top 1 if not close to it. she has crazy accuracy on me. therefore I will consider scumreading me a scumclaim, from her specifically.
@whoever else is interested re: “this argument is going nowhere”: I have unorthodox methods, I know. they don’t make a lot of sense to most people, I know. However, my methods have really worked for me - see [redacted].
- Daenerys
Daenerys (lilith2013) and Dragons (SirCakez)!
Account made before GoT was bad don't hate
In post 449, Daenerys and Dragons wrote:not sure if I am townreading skitter, I think I saw one thing that struck me as towny, but I don’t really like auro’s posts
- Daenerys
What about them don't you like?
combination of gut and now [redacted]
Daenerys (lilith2013) and Dragons (SirCakez)!
Account made before GoT was bad don't hate
Doesn’t preemptively giving away the activity that you see as a scum claim reduce the probability that they will take that action?
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
In post 542, Green Crayons wrote:Doesn’t preemptively giving away the activity that you see as a scum claim reduce the probability that they will take that action?
/shrug
I’m not really concerned about that. I’m perfectly able to sort people when they’re townreading me too. more just letting them know I won’t go easily.
- Daenerys
Daenerys (lilith2013) and Dragons (SirCakez)!
Account made before GoT was bad don't hate
Yes lol, I think you look very towny after that interaction
Auro is weird and cagey, but I can't make much AI out of him.
I mean obviously I think I do too, but the point I’m trying to make is, could I have expected that outcome? What angle does Auro think I’m trying to take wrt my “posturing” that makes him call it out in a way that implies he thinks it’s scum-indicative?
Have not gotten a very satisfactory response from him, or at least enough that I can call that thought process in calling my post “posturing” as genuine.
- Daenerys
Daenerys (lilith2013) and Dragons (SirCakez)!
Account made before GoT was bad don't hate
@lilith I see what you mean, for me I just didn't understand auro so I didn't get anything AI out of it. Have you played with auro enough to distinguish between him being confusing as town vs. scum?