Pages 1-10:
Starting with posts 7-9; Prism called me out on this later.
In post 275, Prism wrote:flow trap, what was your thought process with this sequence?
In post 8, safebet222 wrote:Hey everyone...
VOTE: clarkbar
You just made me think about breaking my diet with candy.
I just wanted to bring up that I do genuinely feel awestruck when I come on to a new site and I wasn’t confident that the meta was what it said it was. A lot of things that can be interpreted as jokes fill the rest of this section until Floo puts the first non-joke vote on me. I give some fake newbie reactions. Quietbet questions the vote, which is strange since they later vote for me. Enchant makes the first plurality and Spartan joins 12 minutes later, which is… okay I guess, I do believe Spartan wouldn’t mind doing this as scum as they seem bold, but not inherently scummy. Floo then reveals their motives for voting me and for calling it partly serious.
In post 77, floo wrote: In post 46, safebet222 wrote:
So how can you have a serious vote of 3 people haven't even checked in?
...
OMGUS?
"..." not part of original post.
With the game becoming more serious, I can explain my motives. I switched my RVS vote from Enchant to flow trap because I wanted to see where a conversation would go. flow trap's posting style is lighthearted with a lot of small talk and interactions with other player, as one of the most active users so far (might be the most active in terms of post count). I stated my vote was "partially serious" (
40) to avoid seeming suspicious from an apparent OMGUS (as you guessed) and a second (apparently) random vote. I am explaining my intentions now because I would rather have flow trap discuss his/her gameplay or opinions than post joke reactions.
I do think their explanation was perfectly sound and therefore their motivation was in good interest. Some posts with nothing then Quietbet puts me on E-1, which I still found towny but it’s not enough to change my current opinion on Quietbet. I was forced to reveal my identity and Zoomer stated suspicion on Quietbet, which I believe continues throughout the round, so that could be a reason for the NK. I state a TR on Quietbet, Floo, & Spartan, I’ve explained why here:
In post 105, flow trap wrote:It seemed like a town play to me, what scum wants this kind of negative attention this early on
… and Quietbet says that it was for reactions. In hindsight, this is slightly odd as there were already reactions just from the E-2. Zoomer continues their suspicion on Quietbet. I bluff SRing FaC because they weren’t doing much and I wanted to see how they responded (I also thought it would be more powerful, but there was little reaction). I also stated a mild suspicion on Zoomer which was true. Salsafairy puts a mild accusation on Quietbet:
In post 118, Salsabil Faria wrote:
If anyone/your scum partner hammered at that point, it would definitely benefit the team mafia cause
(i)
if you are the mafia then you know
flow trap
is a town, so a miselimination would occur and,
(ii)
the day would over without discussing anything, the town would stay behind.
Can't find any town motivation from your E-1 vote.
… but later rescinds it after reading their response to Zoomer.
This came off to me as not SvS, but that’s all I can say.
(I forgot to include my bluff suspicion on FaC (I found their reaction to be towny and non-panicky despite being an early sus) along with Salsafairy’s inquiry about it (which I find NAI), so I’ll mention it here)
We start page 5 with typical Salsafairy and normal conversation. Quick positive mention to floo of reinforcing their ideas. Then I post this:
In post 146, flow trap wrote:I have 2 reasons why I don't want to go on that, the first is interesting interactions as I've stated before, and the second I will not state as I do not feel it should be shared yet and it's still developing
The second reason was that I had a mild thought that Zoomer and Salsa were masons. Obviously, that didn’t stay as I voted Salsa in 218, so that’s not a reason for me to NK them. (Update from future Flow, I actually thought they were masons at a different time later, the second reason which I just remembered was the lack of resistance) Pages 7 & 8 are mostly me + dead players or discussing the dead, but I do like Quietbet’s sarcasm. Salsafairy gives some “reactions” but they don’t really add anything to the game, so sus that. Then I vote that, which was genuine, then Salsafairy decides to contribute, which is also suspicious. However, I have to give them some credit for their 226 read list. Then they go back to their suspicious non-Sequitur self and that’s the end of page 10.
