lol oopsIn post 697, AaronFrost wrote:the other two votes, ben and isis
That doesn't really explain why you think that since you basically just said what you said in 664 but with different wording. What in our interactions causes you to come to the conclusion of 1 scum in me/Datisi/ben?In post 670, Scipio1 wrote:their interactions with each other don't seem to be w/w in any world but I'm having trouble believing that they're v/v/v fsr.In post 668, notscience wrote:Why does your gut say there’s scum in that group?
basically yes, and the fact that posting up to ~page 25 was also pretty badIn post 606, ben dover123 wrote:Also just to make sure I'm still looking in the right direction,@everyone on the isis wagonare you still voting her because of the V/LA attack?
nope we're hereIn post 665, Scipio1 wrote:Also did sec/hyd just fall off the map or is that just me? I have little to no memory of any of their recent posts.
hey NM, make a readslist for me and i'll give u a hammer
Oh I see. Still, no I did case myself against the apparent attacks that were made against me. I can pull up quotes for that if you want.In post 676, Schiavetto wrote: I mean, it's less about whether you "can" or "can't" and more about how you ask what the reason is behind those votes, but nothing about that post reads to me as you being genuinely interested in understanding the three votes. Like, I don't think it's out of the question for town to have such a defensive reaction there (three votes in quick succession like that is cause for alarm, sure), but where that falls apart for me is that you're not casing yourself, you're not casing any of the three voters, and there's like... no attempt to actually discriminate between the three votes or determine possible motivations for them or anything like that. And it's not like any of that is mandatory or whatever, but the absence is felt. Some of the stuff that follows--like the tangent on phaselengths, or the explanation for your hesitation to read any of those votes--is maybe less glaring, but still kind of feels unnatural to me, almost like an afterthought.
That's p much where I was at.
You don't feel like the Isis wagon is bad now?Datisi wrote:cool.
VOTE: isis
what made you think so and who is scum then?
She put a lot of effort into her reads and I respect that. Not fully town for me but entering that nulltown area.seCret hYdra wrote:also does anyone disagree with schiavetto town?
- hYdra
noIn post 711, ben dover123 wrote:You don't feel like the Isis wagon is bad now?
I think her posting in the last few pages shows a very natural and logical though process (some examples are 617-624, 648, 652, 669, 672) that if it comes from scum, it's very well manufactured to look natural, but i genuinely feel like her posting has become more and more organic over time.
that's an "effort = town" kind of read?In post 711, ben dover123 wrote:She put a lot of effort into her reads and I respect that. Not fully town for me but entering that nulltown area.
Schiavetto's kind of in the same category of my reads as notsci and you where they've had enough content that I feel like I should have some read on them but I honestly don't.
relatableIn post 714, AaronFrost wrote:As for who's scum, I honestly have no fucking clue. I don't feel like I have the best grasp on this game at the moment so I'll probably do some rereading when I have time and see what I can find.
I mean, if I knew my exact thought process behind this thought I would've explained it lol.In post 702, AaronFrost wrote:That doesn't really explain why you think that since you basically just said what you said in 664 but with different wording. What in our interactions causes you to come to the conclusion of 1 scum in me/Datisi/ben?In post 670, Scipio1 wrote:their interactions with each other don't seem to be w/w in any world but I'm having trouble believing that they're v/v/v fsr.In post 668, notscience wrote:Why does your gut say there’s scum in that group?
do you agree with 618? from my pov it felt like being nitpicked over minute unimportant details. does the knowledge of "isis has seen town!me be *not* as townie" challenge your view? and what is your read on me, anyway?In post 713, AaronFrost wrote:I think her posting in the last few pages shows a very natural and logical though process (some examples are 617-624, 648, 652, 669, 672) that if it comes from scum, it's very well manufactured to look natural, but i genuinely feel like her posting has become more and more organic over time.
I also don't think the vanity vote on you is something that comes from scum when things have sort of stalled and and she could probably get away with staying on my wagon until end of day (which if she is scum would be her best chance of staying alive). It's just a weird move that doesn't make sense for scum!Isis to make in this situation.
i feel like every once in a while paranoia starts creeping up on me about scipioIn post 718, Scipio1 wrote:I mean, if I knew my exact thought process behind this thought I would've explained it lol.
@benIn post 688, Datisi wrote:(also while we're at it, why *is* [aff] [in the lower half of your nulls], ben?)
