for the second sentence: i'm not asking u for an explanation per se so much as i'm acknowledging a trend that i don't really agree with that you seem to have started more and i'm not sure why that trend is, like, a thing reallyIn post 797, Datisi wrote:i have no clue about you because i don't know how skitter machine works
i can understand mena not yet explicitly townreading me here but i also don't think he should be voting me which is partly why i'm interested for him to get on the phone here (is that the expression? you know what i mean)
i mean like, that's partly why i voted him. if you don't agree with that read/conclusion, fine, but i'm not sure i get what you're trying to ask me here? like the way the second sentence is formed makes me think that you're asking *me* for explanation of other people's votes on him?
i think i get why you think the timing was weird
like as soon as i saw those posts from isis on me, i wanted to vote her, but she was on 5 votes, and i cannot just put someone to 6 votes in a n_m game, but i also didn't wanna give intent yet because i wanted to see her response to me first
so after aaron unvoted, i could then vote her without putting her in lolhammer range
and ya ig that explains the timing a bit; i didn't get why u voted isis when u did
i feel like i have sufficiently sorted you, and would like to proclaim that i think u are somewhat townie
(not, like, as obvtown as multiple people are claiming you are, but enuf that i don't think i need to vote you anymore)
VOTE: implo
more of a sorting vote etc than a scumreading vote necessarily
~ skitter