In post 2136, jjh927 wrote:Please do then
For a start, an immediate vote and sorting which were absent from here.In post 68, Titus wrote:Town
But beyond that:
In post 117, Titus wrote:Not liking bob perfume and vax but that list contains at most 1 scum due to voting theory.
In post 126, Titus wrote:Perfume and Vax are not likely scum together because two scum piling on me is highly unlikely as I don't think I pose that much of a threat. Seems awkward. Vax and Bob are unlikely scum together because they both used the same tactic to create two different wagons. This type of approach draws attention to them both and makes it twice as likely to get caught. Bob and perfume are unlikely scum together because Bob's vote undermines Perfume's "serious" push by creating an alternative. Basically, they aren't acting in concert. [/end professor]In post 123, Red wrote:go onIn post 117, Titus wrote:Not liking bob perfume and vax but that list contains at most 1 scum due tovoting theory.
In post 127, Titus wrote:Why? Do you think my reads are bad? Why the heavy handed discredit?In post 125, wellermanbob wrote:I get the sense just ignoring Titus will be best for the game regardless of their alignmentIn post 123, Red wrote:go onIn post 117, Titus wrote:Not liking bob perfume and vax but that list contains at most 1 scum due tovoting theory.
In post 133, Titus wrote:Wait, you're problem is that I am explaining my reads so I should be discredited? But I'm probably town and you have no interest in working with me because of my explanations? #confusedIn post 129, wellermanbob wrote:I think they're indistinguishable from throwing darts at a board at the moment because you've offered up reasoning that doesn't seem relevant AND you're publicly explaining them all which combines for a nasty distraction in my opinionIn post 127, Titus wrote:Do you think my reads are bad?
In post 136, Titus wrote:Mistyx is likely town. I like Bob more, even if he's annoying me.
In post 191, Titus wrote:Why are you suspicious of my claim? Why is catboi now a serious push? Why are Red and jj town?In post 182, Raya36 wrote:Red, chara, jj, mistyx are fine
Titus claimed negative utility and I haven't figured out if I trust that yet
catboi rvs is now serious
In post 823, Titus wrote:Why weren't the twins the cfd attempt?In post 822, wellermanbob wrote:Not that I disagree with this, but why? Does the red flip change your gamestate evaluation at all?
In post 825, Titus wrote:Chara has always been pretty obvtown. Chara was the CFD attempt that bypassed the twins.In post 824, wellermanbob wrote:Hahaha true that wagon did stall. But so did a Chara one and I have them as basically locktown, to play devils advocate
(Btw this is more in line with Titus being a town mediator--it's lower-effort than her normal town mediator, but there is a notable marked difference between her mediating that game and this game.)In post 288, Titus wrote:Y'all can T v T. Meanwhile Perfume has been dodging this thread since we got out of RVS.
I could go on and point out more of the town posting from Titus that game, but basically--I could instantly tell that Titus was town that game from posts like the above. It immediately was her as I know her. Lower-effort than previous eras of Titus, but still very obviously her as town.
This game she isn't that at all.
In the mastina-Titus duo, I was not the one whose literal first content post in the game, whose second post in the game, was shading the other.In post 2140, Titus wrote:I majorly scumread mastina, who is shading me to ensure her wagon goes through on LLD.
That honor is yours.
This is a statement that is half-true. ScumIn post 2141, Titus wrote:Scum are largely in the passive players like the worst and A50. mastina's fighting like hell to get vocal players eliminated because her partners aren't vocal.
But the scum are fighting to eliminate, by and large, players who're vocal because they don't have many options in the nonvocal players.
A town Titus does not say this, by the way.In post 2149, Titus wrote:If something does go wrong, I'll reasses. Right now, I have my theory of the game I stand by.In post 2145, innocentvillager wrote:hmmm. It's not as much as I thought when I was writing it out but it still feels like you have a lot of empty confidence on multiple theories that sort of falls apart if any of them are kind of false