Alright, so getting off the posturing and dick waving, here's a logical progression:
In post 513, MathBlade wrote:I find it very very unlikely you read Grendel’s posts without reading Porkens due to what Grendel did.
In post 507, MathBlade wrote:You’d probably have that shape your Grendel read possibly. Like why he went from Porkens is scum to now blatantly sheeping you?
This is followed up by a later post where you actually check for reasoning:
In post 512, MathBlade wrote: In post 96, Grendel wrote:townie pr is a more likely to make a hasty assertion like this then scum is imo. Hasty equal less then 48 hours into the day phase, and there only being a few votes on Porkens. Scum could just lay low and let pressure flow else where.
Here is the closest I could see to explain the move off but then here Grendel is outing that he believes someone to be a PR. He apologizes for wanting to get out of RVS.
It’s very very slimy.
And you only make it to post 96, not reading far enough to find Grendel's full writeup in Post 148
In post 148, Grendel wrote:No, historically town pr pops and outs info quicker and under less pressure then scum 9 times out of 10.
Scum have a lot more to lose if forced to claim early b/c it locks them into a claim, and makes the follow-up days harder. Like yes, they dont fear being NK'd, but they do fear town catching them at night, or town wondering why the player hinting at having a strong PR is still alive several days later.
Granted Porkens didnt hard claim. They hinted at having a confirmable/strong town role of some sort. So im not hard TRing them. But i think they presented a good enough reaction that I would town lean them.
You then try to play this off with this piece of flailing:
In post 516, MathBlade wrote:You’re completely overshadowing the fact Grendel went “Hey you’re a PR” to scum and that’s okay to town you? I don’t buy that for a second. You’ve either read your posts which makes you a liar or you didn’t because you didn’t care and you + Grendel is very likely.
But that absolutely doesn't jive at all. You were saying that 96 was the best explanation you could find (after initially suggesting there was no explanation) while you missed the much fuller reasoning that Grendel laid out in 148.
So basically I have to take one of three things:
A)
You haven't read the thread enough to grasp Grendel's motivations
while discrediting me for not having read enough
and you think this is a reasonable thing to do.
B)
You think that 96 is a more complete version of 146
C)
You haven't made an effort to determine Grendel's alignment, because Gamma Emerald told you. You're not making an effort to determine my alignment, because again Gamma Emerald let you know.
I'll take C.
You can throw whatever empty rhetoric you want, math, but this is not a chain of town motivation I'm seeing here. This is scum.