As in, why specifically is GC town here, and do you think Duchess is scum?
Mini Number 2195 | Brutalism | GAME OVER
Forum rules
- VP Baltar
-
VP Baltar he/himSurvivor
- VP Baltar
he/him- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17476
- Joined: November 3, 2008
- Pronoun: he/him
- Reformed Toxic Player
-
Reformed Toxic Player Goon
- Reformed Toxic Player
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 468
- Joined: January 23, 2021
- VP Baltar
-
VP Baltar he/himSurvivor
- VP Baltar
he/him- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17476
- Joined: November 3, 2008
- Pronoun: he/him
Can you point me to what specifically pinged that for you?In post 151, Reformed Toxic Player wrote:acknowledges fault imoYOUR AD HERE- Reformed Toxic Player
-
Reformed Toxic Player Goon
- Reformed Toxic Player
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 468
- Joined: January 23, 2021
In post 145, Green Crayons wrote:Is GC bad at baseball?
Yes. He struck out the first time he went to the plate.
So GC is bad at baseball bc he struck out the first time you went to bat?
Trying to shade me for linking the yes/no longer to the immediately following observation, that I’m twisting words, is just so scummy.
Trying to shade me for connecting the- VP Baltar
-
VP Baltar he/himSurvivor
- VP Baltar
he/him- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17476
- Joined: November 3, 2008
- Pronoun: he/him
- Datisi
-
Datisi he/him, it/itsDrawn from Memory
- Datisi
he/him, it/its- Drawn from Memory
- Drawn from Memory
- Posts: 23603
- Joined: March 28, 2019
- Pronoun: he/him, it/its
- Location: Croatia
@duchess, can you tell me why is green's question pinging you that much? like, why does such a loaded question seem impossible (not quite the right word, but can't think of another rn) from town's pov and what kinda possible push were you seeing there?I will straight up disregard all reason if you have a PR dream again. You can come back and be like, “I dreamt that Locke is a N2 Bulletproof Multitasking Cop and Self-Targeting Doctor,” and I will go, “Okay, Locke kill it is then.”~M- Datisi
-
Datisi he/him, it/itsDrawn from Memory
- Datisi
he/him, it/its- Drawn from Memory
- Drawn from Memory
- Posts: 23603
- Joined: March 28, 2019
- Pronoun: he/him, it/its
- Location: Croatia
maybe?In post 138, RLotus wrote:Also town vibes from RTP, Duchess, and maybe DatisiI will straight up disregard all reason if you have a PR dream again. You can come back and be like, “I dreamt that Locke is a N2 Bulletproof Multitasking Cop and Self-Targeting Doctor,” and I will go, “Okay, Locke kill it is then.”~M- RLotus
-
RLotus Mafia Scum
- RLotus
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1010
- Joined: November 4, 2020
yeah you give me maybe town vibesIn post 156, Datisi wrote:
maybe?In post 138, RLotus wrote:Also town vibes from RTP, Duchess, and maybe Datisi- Datisi
-
Datisi he/him, it/itsDrawn from Memory
- Datisi
he/him, it/its- Drawn from Memory
- Drawn from Memory
- Posts: 23603
- Joined: March 28, 2019
- Pronoun: he/him, it/its
- Location: Croatia
ok
what does maybe town mean (i.e. how is it different from town) and what's giving you those vibesI will straight up disregard all reason if you have a PR dream again. You can come back and be like, “I dreamt that Locke is a N2 Bulletproof Multitasking Cop and Self-Targeting Doctor,” and I will go, “Okay, Locke kill it is then.”~M- Reformed Toxic Player
-
Reformed Toxic Player Goon
- Reformed Toxic Player
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 468
- Joined: January 23, 2021
those were 2 separate points.In post 154, VP Baltar wrote:He isn't being cagey about his reads in that post. He is using a metaphor to explain his viewpoint
you just assumed they were one and the same.- Reformed Toxic Player
-
Reformed Toxic Player Goon
- Reformed Toxic Player
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 468
- Joined: January 23, 2021
- Datisi
-
Datisi he/him, it/itsDrawn from Memory
- Datisi
he/him, it/its- Drawn from Memory
- Drawn from Memory
- Posts: 23603
- Joined: March 28, 2019
- Pronoun: he/him, it/its
- Location: Croatia
do you wanna say anything about it?I will straight up disregard all reason if you have a PR dream again. You can come back and be like, “I dreamt that Locke is a N2 Bulletproof Multitasking Cop and Self-Targeting Doctor,” and I will go, “Okay, Locke kill it is then.”~M- RLotus
-
RLotus Mafia Scum
- RLotus
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1010
- Joined: November 4, 2020
Townlean but less sure. I like the places you've been poking you feel townIn post 158, Datisi wrote:ok
what does maybe town mean (i.e. how is it different from town) and what's giving you those vibes- VP Baltar
-
VP Baltar he/himSurvivor
- VP Baltar
he/him- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17476
- Joined: November 3, 2008
- Pronoun: he/him
Then explain specifically where he is being cagey about his reads. I don't see it and need an explanationIn post 159, Reformed Toxic Player wrote:
those were 2 separate points.In post 154, VP Baltar wrote:He isn't being cagey about his reads in that post. He is using a metaphor to explain his viewpoint
you just assumed they were one and the same.YOUR AD HERE- Reformed Toxic Player
-
Reformed Toxic Player Goon
- Reformed Toxic Player
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 468
- Joined: January 23, 2021
- Reformed Toxic Player
-
Reformed Toxic Player Goon
- Reformed Toxic Player
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 468
- Joined: January 23, 2021
- Duchess
-
Duchess Goon
- Duchess
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 143
- Joined: July 19, 2015
Green Crayons. You are characterizing my push on you as a response to your suspicion of me, which is a complete fabrication you seem to have pulled out of thin air for the sake of your argument. My trajectory is very clearly laid out. To call me defensive is nothing but more baseless projection.
I still entirely disagree with your interpretation of VD's response. The last two sentences are not full-on non-sequiturs, but they're not a justification for the first. I see them as Italiano adding his own thoughts to RTP's previous post. I am not interested in discussing theory of conversation or hearing your analogies, and I'm troubled by your refusal to address the post in question directly.Gotta frown at some of this stuffThey say that new Duchess don't sound hungry enough- Duchess
-
Duchess Goon
- Duchess
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 143
- Joined: July 19, 2015
His defense and attempt to turn the tables on me are strengthening my read by a lot. I don't know exactly what kind of push I was expecting to see, but if I recall correctly there was some discussion just before that time of Italiano possibly being an easy early push, and what I saw pinged me, so I wanted to nip it in the bud.In post 155, Datisi wrote:@duchess, can you tell me why is green's question pinging you that much? like, why does such a loaded question seem impossible (not quite the right word, but can't think of another rn) from town's pov and what kinda possible push were you seeing there?Gotta frown at some of this stuffThey say that new Duchess don't sound hungry enough- Reformed Toxic Player
-
Reformed Toxic Player
- ItalianoVD
-
ItalianoVD HeMafia Scum
- ItalianoVD
He- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2701
- Joined: May 19, 2020
- Pronoun: He
- Location: Interregnum Multiverse
That was a joke I mentioned to RTP, wasn't anything serious.In post 167, Duchess wrote:but if I recall correctly there was some discussion just before that time of Italiano possibly being an easy early push, and what I saw pinged me, so I wanted to nip it in the bud.
I gotta say I'm not at all comfortable being in the middle of this Duchess/Green Crayons thing, lol. Like yikes, I don't like what I say to be a basis to read someone else off when it wasn't my intention to do so. If this is theatre please choose something else to fight over and leave me out of it and if you're town then just drop it, it's not that serious.
@Duchess: I already said I didn't have an issue with Green's questioning. Your defense of me pings me more than anything especially this early in the game. And it all seems weird given that I was a FoS for you as posted in 90
VOTE: Duchess
Is there a reason you are so adamant about this?
And just to clarify, my Baltar vote was a reaction test vote, it wasn't really my solidified vote. That there wasn't more reaction to it, ehh I don't know how to feel about it just yet.- ItalianoVD
-
ItalianoVD HeMafia Scum
- ItalianoVD
He- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2701
- Joined: May 19, 2020
- Pronoun: He
- Location: Interregnum Multiverse
I'm sorry, who is pearl fey?In post 165, Reformed Toxic Player wrote:theres a reason i think pearl fey is town but i wanna wait to reveal it to see if that wagon builds cuz i wanna see game state before i out it cuz i think its relatively strong of a reason to townread them.- Reformed Toxic Player
-
Reformed Toxic Player Goon
- Reformed Toxic Player
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 468
- Joined: January 23, 2021
harumiIn post 170, ItalianoVD wrote:
I'm sorry, who is pearl fey?In post 165, Reformed Toxic Player wrote:theres a reason i think pearl fey is town but i wanna wait to reveal it to see if that wagon builds cuz i wanna see game state before i out it cuz i think its relatively strong of a reason to townread them.- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
Mischaracterization.In post 166, Duchess wrote:Green Crayons. You are characterizing my push on you as a response to your suspicion of me, which is a complete fabrication you seem to have pulled out of thin air for the sake of your argument. My trajectory is very clearly laid out. To call me defensive is nothing but more baseless projection.
I said you were affirmatively defending VD and separately your attack on me when I questioned your defense of VD was suspicious. I have never said that you started pushing me solely in response to my suspicion of you, which is contradicted by my first engaging you based on your fence-sitting attack on my Q to VD. You first started pushing me to defend VD, and then started attacking me when I pressed you back.
Lies.I still entirely disagree with your interpretation of VD's response. The last two sentences are not full-on non-sequiturs, but they're not a justification for the first. I see them as Italiano adding his own thoughts to RTP's previous post. I am not interested in discussing theory of conversation or hearing your analogies, and I'm troubled by your refusal to address the post in question directly.
I haven’t refused to address any post.
To the extent you think I’ve missed some brilliant point, rather than shading me even further you could point it out rather than nebulously referring to it.
Also, love how slippery you’re being:
- Dutchess: “GC’s question is -clearly strawmanning-”
- GC: “no, here is what his response was and basic Q&A construction and the English language connects those ideas”
- Dutchess: “I don’t want to talk about that, which undermines my shading of your Q”
To cut through this back and forth about how I interpreted VD’s post differently than you: I specifically squarely asked VD a Q to clarify his response, which nullifies your entire supposed premise for why my interaction with VD is suspect. You (supposedly) have no idea what VD was going to say—for example, he could’ve said “yeah, I’m a bad scum bc I shouldn’t have let myself get quick eliminated.” Your premature jump to defend is just so suspect, and your attack-as-a-defense just underscores it."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
This post is screaming TMIIn post 167, Duchess wrote:I don't know exactly what kind of push I was expecting to see, but if I recall correctly there was some discussion just before that time of Italiano possibly being an easy early push, and what I saw pinged me, so I wanted to nip it in the bud."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
Anyone play with Datisi before?"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting). - Green Crayons
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Reformed Toxic Player
- ItalianoVD
- ItalianoVD
- Duchess
- Duchess
- Reformed Toxic Player
- Reformed Toxic Player
- VP Baltar
- RLotus
- Datisi
- Reformed Toxic Player
- Reformed Toxic Player
- Datisi
- RLotus
- Datisi
- Datisi
- VP Baltar
- Reformed Toxic Player
- VP Baltar
- Reformed Toxic Player
- VP Baltar