I list all possible formations of a 4-members scum team and then look for posts that are unlikely to come from a partner. For example, let's say X makes a post about Y that is really offensive and Y reports them, or that X & Y are run up and are at 6 votes each and then Z decides to to switch from voting X to voting Y. I would deduce Y isn't partners with X or Z (or let's say very unlikely to be), so I eliminate all teams that would include Y with either/or X/Z as partners.
Serious hint: DON'T DO IT. It's VERY wearisome, and you're likely to make a mistake that would force you to either repeat from the start or simply call it quits.
In post 3499, Hopkirk wrote:OR explain why you think there's 3 scum instead of the 4-5 you'd expect at these numbers?
This one I don't understand so can't respond to, Where did I say there are only 3 scums?
In post 3499, Hopkirk wrote:i don't think i like anyone who has confident readlists immediately after the day starts (except Dunn) because why would you reread at night
I don't care what you like/dislike. I play my own way and not to please you (or anyone else), with all due respect.
I also don't know how to feel about the last part (because why would you reread at night). I want to win the game, and I have a flip by the end of the day (something I didn't have all through the game while the day lasted) so why the hell
wouldn't
I reread with the new info for who pushed whom at what time.. etc.? Even during twilight (which I didn't even witness, but theoretically speaking..) I still wouldn't have known -for sure- the alignment of the eliminated player, so can't deduce much from someone's push on them or someone's defence of them.
So, a reread during the night in a LARGE game which I CARE about winning sounds like a must-do to me. I'm surprised YOU didn't do that, tbh.