yeah like Bell can you not break the unwritten rule of mafia that nobody points out that most of our reads are only marginally above random?
(we vote at something slightly above what EVs would suggest i think? i remember reading something on that)
In post 3633, innocentvillager wrote: In post 3512, Hopkirk wrote:
In post 3422, innocentvillager wrote:i think {OkaPoka, mastina, A50, Dunnstral, AGar, Winter} is more likely to be town than the list of everyone else and that's essentially where im at in reads
why most of these?
(i agree on Mastina/Dunn)
AGar we've talked about before
2821,
2833,
2845,
2848,
2850 and I don't necessarily see any reasons to change my current evaluation of him as it stands. He has kind of continued the activity and direct/confrontational posting on D2 that I felt I saw towards EOD1. With DGB's townflip and SirCakez from its team leaning town on AGar (having hard-caught scum!AGar recently), that gives me a little bit more confidence on AGar as well
I am definitely open to re-evaluating him, are there specific things I should look at?
Winter I've talked about
OkaPoka - Oka feels kind of like me this game, in that if he is scum, he has been faking all the highs and lows of the deadline scramble, being present when it's urgent, and actively pushing the town to be productive at times when it felt pretty natural to do so. His confidence and excitement on pushing DGB especially when the major wagons we've revealed have all been town feels like an unnecessary amount of weight to be putting behind an elimination, although I'll admit that this could be agenda-motivated because without him DGB probably doesn't become a wagon so maybe NAI. I feel like Oka is more of a town player from his style and I don't believe he can deepwolf this convincingly as scum (if I'm wrong, please link me a game and let me know), nor is he as incentivized to anymore with his team already losing Black Flag. If he's scum I'm kind of fine letting him keep being himself and just get more readable over time. But I'm also open to reconsidering here that he's for some reason decided to effort and play the deepwolf here.
A50 - mostly a tonal read and my teammate Gypyx thinks he can read A50 reasonably well and also thinks he's town. I think the increased urgency of A50 as we go into D2 with 3 townflips with all the varied, urgent thoughts he is putting out seems town!indicative. My experience with scum!A50 is that he kind of fades into the background and I remember lol!writing him off as town because it looked like he was just doing his own thing the whole game. The crux of the A50 scumgame from what I remember is looking busy and that's not at all what I'm seeing when he's engaged with thread. I am also open to re-evaluating here because I don't know if I put that much stock into my half-hearted meta.
i'm not really sure why i asked this actually because i don't see myself being convinced on anyone i haven't reread because a reason you have is only ever going to be like a parahraph unless you're hard casing which feels less useful to me than my thoughts that i have few of there tbh
i'll look back at agar and highlight stuff/respond to your quoted ones over the weekend. like your point in 2850 he didn't get pushed by anyone else for it so the idea that he wouldn't go for it because of pushback isn't really convincing
In post 3659, Almost50 wrote:
I list all possible formations of a 4-members scum team and then look for posts that are unlikely to come from a partner. For example, let's say X makes a post about Y that is really offensive and Y reports them, or that X & Y are run up and are at 6 votes each and then Z decides to to switch from voting X to voting Y. I would deduce Y isn't partners with X or Z (or let's say very unlikely to be), so I eliminate all teams that would include Y with either/or X/Z as partners.
Serious hint: DON'T DO IT. It's VERY wearisome, and you're likely to make a mistake that would force you to either repeat from the start or simply call it quits.
In post 3499, Hopkirk wrote:OR explain why you think there's 3 scum instead of the 4-5 you'd expect at these numbers?
This one I don't understand so can't respond to, Where did I say there are only 3 scums?
In post 3499, Hopkirk wrote:i don't think i like anyone who has confident readlists immediately after the day starts (except Dunn) because why would you reread at night
I don't care what you like/dislike. I play my own way and not to please you (or anyone else), with all due respect.
I also don't know how to feel about the last part (because why would you reread at night). I want to win the game, and I have a flip by the end of the day (something I didn't have all through the game while the day lasted) so why the hell
wouldn't
I reread with the new info for who pushed whom at what time.. etc.? Even during twilight (which I didn't even witness, but theoretically speaking..) I still wouldn't have known -for sure- the alignment of the eliminated player, so can't deduce much from someone's push on them or someone's defence of them.
So, a reread during the night in a LARGE game which I CARE about winning sounds like a must-do to me. I'm surprised YOU didn't do that, tbh.
so my question is that i can't tell what your system is saying. my assumption was that a (2) meant 2 of these people and a (1) meant 1 of these people for 3 total. if that's not how it works, which i assumed it wasn't because assuming 3 scum would have been weird, then how does it actually work? i can't tell what the '2 scumteams' are that you're modelling from it
when i say like/dislike i mean not sus/sus
i don't hard reread at night because of nightkills + not liking the feeling of wasted effort. sometimes i skim. i skimmed some stuff but no full hard isoing or meta stuff
In post 3665, Almost50 wrote: In post 3502, Hopkirk wrote:A50 were the multiple pages of you not getting the setup you joking or serious?
I was serious, but let's not start that again. I brain farted and had two separate thought processes going on in the back of my mind in parallel and they never intersected. (parallel
lines
thoughts never meet)
ooh that's the + town answer (that it was serious)
In post 3671, Almost50 wrote:
THAT is part of why a reread during the night is a must. Whether you vocalize your thoughts explicitly or use them to form reads is your own choice.
you uh, can't post at night. if anyone did it overnight then they didn't post an analysis in the day
There's no reaching. I've become enlightened.