I'd love to.In post 849, Dunnstral wrote:We can talk about why Mathblade is scum if you want.
I think he's obviously town.
So assume you're wrong about me and convince me why I'm wrong about MathBlade. Or point me to a post where you've done this.
I'd love to.In post 849, Dunnstral wrote:We can talk about why Mathblade is scum if you want.
You are severely overestimating the pull LLD has in this playerlistIn post 849, Dunnstral wrote:The only way I'm getting eliminated today is if LLD thinks that is a good idea.
What?In post 838, Dunnstral wrote:Sircakez, Battle Mage, GreyIce, and yourself
This is resistance to mathblade, not all are ok with going titus as well; most are instead tunneled on me to a frankly unrealistic degree
Sangres is honorarily ont he list because they keep directing questions at mewhile supposedly suspecting Mathbladebut it doesn't have the same feel
Let's not forget about this.In post 483, Dunnstral wrote:Are you saying I somehow attacked you?In post 329, MathBlade wrote:LLD Mala Prism Bell Titus Dunn are one person. Some have stated they’ve checked out til elim phase. That’s not one person.In post 321, SirCakez wrote:He was literally saying he was excited to play the game but was accepting that he was going to be elimmed after like one person attacked him. It was ridiculous.In post 268, Kitty Trauma Team wrote:In post 265, SirCakez wrote:Ok what's your point here? This is such a dumb thing to nitpick.
My point is that I feel like you're making mountains out of emotional molehills by calling that a meltdown, and that's a real real strong alarm bell to me.
So again, I ask you, what part of that post you quoted do you call a meltdown? Two mildly peeved posts, if even that level of annoyance is hardly a meltdown, but that's the word you used.
-k
In post 151, sangres wrote:Have you played with Math since coming back from hiatus?
I haven't. Nacho probably has more recent game experience than me.
I'm not townreading Math.
In post 279, sangres wrote:I'm going to take this under advisement because Mathblade's approach to the game, particularly that bit about 1 but not 2 scum in prism/bork gave me a nasty case of hives. Maybe you can be the counter-balance to my tendencies wrt
This is what I was looking at when I made the post.In post 697, sangres wrote:I kinda feel the same but I'm not sure how much of it comes from the Dunn wagon basically popping up as a counter to the Mathblade push.
Then I'll get math elimmedIn post 851, Spiffeh wrote:You are severely overestimating the pull LLD has in this playerlist :lol:In post 849, Dunnstral wrote:The only way I'm getting eliminated today is if LLD thinks that is a good idea.
My intention was to inspire you to scumhunt elsewhere, not uninspire you.
That's a pretty damn curated segment of our trajectories on Math. I'd go so far as to say "cherry-picked".Dunnstral wrote:In post 151, sangres wrote:Have you played with Math since coming back from hiatus?
I haven't. Nacho probably has more recent game experience than me.
I'm not townreading Math.In post 279, sangres wrote:I'm going to take this under advisement because Mathblade's approach to the game, particularly that bit about 1 but not 2 scum in prism/bork gave me a nasty case of hives. Maybe you can be the counter-balance to my tendencies wrtThis is what I was looking at when I made the post.In post 697, sangres wrote:I kinda feel the same but I'm not sure how much of it comes from the Dunn wagon basically popping up as a counter to the Mathblade push.
Yeah.In post 861, sangres wrote:That's a pretty damn curated segment of our trajectories on Math. I'd go so far as to say "cherry-picked".Dunnstral wrote:In post 151, sangres wrote:Have you played with Math since coming back from hiatus?
I haven't. Nacho probably has more recent game experience than me.
I'm not townreading Math.In post 279, sangres wrote:I'm going to take this under advisement because Mathblade's approach to the game, particularly that bit about 1 but not 2 scum in prism/bork gave me a nasty case of hives. Maybe you can be the counter-balance to my tendencies wrtThis is what I was looking at when I made the post.In post 697, sangres wrote:I kinda feel the same but I'm not sure how much of it comes from the Dunn wagon basically popping up as a counter to the Mathblade push.
you first mentioned traitor (499) after math declared a scumread on you (492)In post 855, Dunnstral wrote:Look how easily they scumread me when I pointed out that they would be the most likely traitor for bringing up traitor for what seems like no reason
It's not omgus because I didn't call them scum. They said I attacked them somewhere but they can't point to it, and indeed I didn't even mention them prior.In post 864, borkjerfkin wrote:you first mentioned traitor (499) after math declared a scumread on you (492)In post 855, Dunnstral wrote:Look how easily they scumread me when I pointed out that they would be the most likely traitor for bringing up traitor for what seems like no reason
this just seems like a "math is OMGUSing me" dressed up in something irrelevant, factually untrue or otherwise
Probably would've been my guessIn post 152, Dunnstral wrote:Scummy readsIn post 110, MathBlade wrote:I think Spiffeh town BM scum Prism null LLD scum lean Cakez is prob town but scum in a very minor circumstance so not considering it. If I am right then Titus is town by proxy.
I literally can't parse thisIn post 550, MathBlade wrote:Eg Dunn and Cakez although not voting saying meltdown
I forgot I made this post. Looking back these were scummy readsIn post 866, borkjerfkin wrote:Probably would've been my guessIn post 152, Dunnstral wrote:Scummy readsIn post 110, MathBlade wrote:I think Spiffeh town BM scum Prism null LLD scum lean Cakez is prob town but scum in a very minor circumstance so not considering it. If I am right then Titus is town by proxy.
It's their justification for voting meborkjerfkin wrote:I literally can't parse thisIn post 550, MathBlade wrote:Eg Dunn and Cakez although not voting saying meltdown
You're underestimating it. Don't mistake leaning back on the gas pedal to allow natural growth for a lack of ability to ram something down your throat.In post 851, Spiffeh wrote:You are severely overestimating the pull LLD has in this playerlistIn post 849, Dunnstral wrote:The only way I'm getting eliminated today is if LLD thinks that is a good idea.
I'm not nervous your logic is terrible if it's what I think you're implying.In post 833, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:don't be nervous buddyIn post 827, SirCakez wrote:what are you trying to insinuate here?
what does it mean then?In post 868, Dunnstral wrote:It's their justification for voting me