Content less posts are very scummyIn post 123, Kazyan wrote:I understand the Pooky read, but for a different reason: Up until now, Pooky's posts felt content-free rather than that he was trying to sort people. I really disagree that the Skitter wagon was scummy. Not trying to sort people might be, though.In post 116, CreativeName wrote:If we split players into 2 groups based on activity
Active:
Me - Creative
You - Kazyan
Skitter
Wheme
Pooky
Inactive/low activity
Megan
T3
Griff
SAMCRO
Possibly my 2 most likely from active grouping is either Pooky or Wheme, I'd possibly order it from most to least as Pooky, Wheme, Kazyan, Skitter, Me
As for IA because of the nature of inactivity it makes players harder to read however from what i read of T3 they'd be less likely to be scum compared to some of the others, due to maybe some of them possibly lurking
I do see the quickwagon attempt as scummy due to the fact that it gained 3/5 required votes within a span of a few posts, then disappeared quickly after skitter came online
as for this
That is why I said "discrediting" Someone referred to it as that earlier, I don't think it is but what They were refering to, what I quoted, was like kazyan said content-less posting and warning me of a danger no one else seemed to see, I think it's possible pocketing or trying to get me to town read youIn post 121, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:um how am I discrediting her?In post 120, CreativeName wrote:The "discrediting" of skitter, as it was referred to, I see it as maybe a pocket attempt disguised as a warning or maybe it's being a bit over cautious
![:]](./images/smilies/icon_smiling.png "Cheerful Smile"){kind=icon}
