being capable of it doesnt mean im good at itIn post 2169, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Zoomer has felt town earlier but dropped a bit in my reads recently. I want to see if they can maybe post a reads list or do something townie to ease my paranoia there. Because i think they’d be capable of it if town.
First he says that but then when Norway calls him out:In post 2197, KittyTacky wrote:If I was scum RBer I'd fake claim and use it to RB town power roles instead of:
N1: Waiting a night
N2: RBing a non-claimer who I read as a VT.
Your argument falls flat, Norwe.
They sidestep the issue by saying something that doesn't make sense in context.In post 2219, KittyTacky wrote:"They" was referring to whatever other role would be able to confirm. Sorry if this was ambiguous.In post 2202, UNOwen wrote:In post 1973, KittyTacky wrote: DK's softclaim counts as a claim by the way.In post 2008, KittyTacky wrote: I blocked DK. They implied they'd be able to confirm it.:/In post 2197, KittyTacky wrote: N2: RBing a non-claimer who I read as a VT.
Then that just means you aren't even a roleblocker? Or a very crappy one. That means you could be a different scum power role instead who got coached to claim Roleblocker.In post 2220, KittyTacky wrote:You're not actually countering my argument about how I'm not likely to be a scum roleblockerIn post 2214, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Pray tell, where have i been "flailing"? >_>because one of the invetigatives would have been blocked. Instead you keep calling me sus for no good reason.
That's good...flow trap wrote:VOTE: Anya
I am visitor
Oh oops UNVOTE: AnyaIn post 2227, Anya wrote:flow you need to sort out your spelling
you somehow wrote someone else's name and typoed it so badly it turned into mine
you have the same powers I do twinIn post 2230, Elsa Jay wrote:Wait that works? You can do that Anya?
So 2008 was intended to read: "I blocked DK. They implied 'someone else' would be able to confirm it.".In post 2219, KittyTacky wrote: "They" was referring to whatever other role would be able to confirm. Sorry if this was ambiguous.
Yeah. English is not my native language, it sounded better in Russian.In post 2237, UNOwen wrote:So 2008 was intended to read: "I blocked DK. They implied 'someone else' would be able to confirm it.".In post 2219, KittyTacky wrote: "They" was referring to whatever other role would be able to confirm. Sorry if this was ambiguous.
In post 2204, UNOwen wrote:Would like Elsa to explain why he believes N_M is unlikely to be a goon.
Elsa and Eso respectivelyIn post 2238, UNOwen wrote:Who've you been visiting flow trap?
Is this a meta town read?In post 2241, Elsa Jay wrote:? Because when he plays it's not to far off of his trolly meta.
Yeah this is logical if we assume that one scum can't use night action and kill (I guess that's what you mean by multitask), but why are we assuming that?In post 2241, Elsa Jay wrote: If you've listened to me before I said I think scum has 2 PR and 1 goon. Granted after tonight they probably have all the info they need but for atleast the first 2 nights the goon probably did the kill while the other 2 investigated the town.
This means I don't think there's multitask on by the way. But if a scum flips with that then I'll reconsider my reads on you and NotMaf.
No, actually I'm a combined vig docIn post 2243, Elsa Jay wrote:Is it just a visitor? Nothing elsa?
Weird - a vig doc with whats essentially a flipped cop?In post 2246, flow trap wrote:No, actually I'm a combined vig docIn post 2243, Elsa Jay wrote:Is it just a visitor? Nothing elsa?