At the moment i find it unlikely but still plausible that Vanderscamp, if scum, is with Infinity. But i could see Skitter and you, easily.In post 1171, Bingle wrote:Do you agree or disagree that he's probably not scum with anyone else?In post 1169, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I will be voting Vanderscamp because if he's scum with you or anyone else it's an insta-win.
I'd probably just ignore your wagon and hope it dissipates on its own because it's not even two days into the game and the first major wagon of any game usually just dies.In post 1174, No Face wrote:You keep saying you wouldn't react like this as scum, then how would you actually? You gave a non-serious answer earlier, but I'd be interested in hearing how you think you'd actually react 1{£
You vigged him in that game?In post 1177, Infinity 324 wrote:He feels much townier than when I vigged him
Why does that make them less likely?.?In post 1180, NorwegianboyEE wrote:You vigged him in that game?In post 1177, Infinity 324 wrote:He feels much townier than when I vigged him
Well that makes Infinity/Vanderscamp even more unlikely than it already was.
What about you being okay with not dancing with anyone in Epilogue?-?In post 1182, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:no me pushing for me to be left behind in trust fall made perfect sense.
I wanted to get the people who were scum reading me out of the game so I could more easily manipulate the game state.
Bingle's point about Vanderscamp needing to be considered a very good endgame player if they were to be put in the 6P. And if Infinity already has the bias that "Vanderscamp isn't good at scum" they'd probably want to be in the 6p pool.In post 1183, No Face wrote:Why does that make them less likely?.?In post 1180, NorwegianboyEE wrote:You vigged him in that game?In post 1177, Infinity 324 wrote:He feels much townier than when I vigged him
Well that makes Infinity/Vanderscamp even more unlikely than it already was.
ok so if you don't understand why my reaction would come from scum!me why would you say you want to kill me for my reaction?In post 1181, No Face wrote:In reality, I don't really know why you would here but I also don't understand why town!you would react the way you did here ~.~
I feel like you should also consider the fact that I'm much weaker at scum than jingle or skitt. Mostly because that means skitt/vander is unlikely.In post 1186, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Bingle's point about Vanderscamp needing to be considered a very good endgame player if they were to be put in the 6P. And if Infinity already has the bias that "Vanderscamp isn't good at scum" they'd probably want to be in the 6p pool.
In post 1189, No Face wrote:I'm not saying that Pooky, I'm saying I don't know the exact scum motivation behind your reaction but you having the thoughts which led you to that reaction feels less likely to be real and coming from town!you !;
The 1v1 was started on this post or before:In post 1190, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:Like map out what happens if scum!me forces a 1v1 on d1/d2 while at a disadvantage.
probly 60%-80% of the time you elim me, game is over
40%-20% of the time, I elim you, I get elimmed on the next day, town has 2 chances to elim my partner in 3 players, there's probably enough info from D1 to narrow down who the partner is or at least rule out one partner.
Either way I lose.
So why would I even expend the energy to pursue almost certain loss?
This makes 0 sense for scum!me to do to town!you yet you continue to insist that's what's happening here nad that's what's like mindboggling to me. That you think this is a path that scum!me decides to go down.
In post 647, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:the essence of his push on me isn't "I scumread Pooky"
it's I town-read everyone else for ___, ____, ____, and _____
It leaves one person out of the equation, notably that's himself.
It's an effective strategy for pushing mis-elims on d1 because you create a coalition/support by handing out townreads to get people to help you, and you create a mutual target for everyone to go after.
It's also incredibly difficult for me to defend against because he's not actually scum-reading me for anything, so there's nothing for me to refute
then tomm after I'm flipped town he will "go back" to his townreads and "think" about where he went wrong.
I don't think you're at a big disadvantage by any means. Vanders and Norwee both haven't sided with either of us yet, and you probably think Mene will side with youIn post 650, SirCakez wrote:
Thinking I've decided you're the miselim for the day when all I did was PoE vote you, and thinking I should reevaluate one irl day into the game just because Bingle is also voting you and he's my bottom read in the group of 3In post 1192, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:In post 1189, No Face wrote:I'm not saying that Pooky, I'm saying I don't know the exact scum motivation behind your reaction but you having the thoughts which led you to that reaction feels less likely to be real and coming from town!you !;
Which thoughts feel fake to you that couldn't come from town!me?
LA LA LA I CAN'T HEAR YOUIn post 1184, NorwegianboyEE wrote:This is a true 1v1 between No Face / Pooky
They are completely deaf to any other sounds.
Kinda makes it feel even more townie tbh. I'd expect scum!them to try to win over everyone else's side in pushing through the other as an elimination rather than just have pure arguing.
Ydrasse voted you for the same exact reason of PoE and acknowledged that, but you still think I'm scummy for it even though you can see another player in our pool has done the same thing, and we can't both be scum together (one of us is town at least)In post 653, Ydrasse wrote:pooky, i basically feel the same way about you, am i scum for voting you? i don't feel like you've done anything this game that's towny, you gave us a ~plan~ but it doesn't feel like you've much done anything to facilitate that plan giving us good results
In post 971, No Face wrote:I really don't like Bingle for agreeing with Pooky's reasoning that I'm scummy for not reevaluating that one of my scumreads happens to be voting the other. I've been pushed for this as town before and I've never understood it, I just treat my reads independently, and no, Bingle voting for Pooky while I'm sus of both is not going to magically make me less suspicious of Pooky. Yes, it means they are less likely to be aligned if Bingle commits to that vote/push but before that, distancing is a thing, and even if I think Bingle/Pooky aren't aligned, what do I do? I townread 4 others in that and Pooky is nullscum, I don't just randomly go and scumread one of my townreads. I just really don't understand that scumread/reason at all but maybe Pooky and I just think differentlyIn post 969, Vanderscamp wrote:I think it might be pooky and bingle.
What I really don't like is Bingle agreeing with that assessment though (_(
In post 1194, No Face wrote:Thinking I've decided you're the miselim for the day when all I did was PoE vote you, and thinking I should reevaluate one irl day into the game just because Bingle is also voting you and he's my bottom read in the group of 3
gs.d
Ydrasse tends to be a lot less decisive as scum, I've played a few games with scum!herIn post 1196, No Face wrote:Ydrasse voted you for the same exact reason of PoE and acknowledged that, but you still think I'm scummy for it even though you can see another player in our pool has done the same thing, and we can't both be scum together (one of us is town at least)In post 653, Ydrasse wrote:pooky, i basically feel the same way about you, am i scum for voting you? i don't feel like you've done anything this game that's towny, you gave us a ~plan~ but it doesn't feel like you've much done anything to facilitate that plan giving us good results
:E