green crayons opens with associating two players for weak reasonsIn post 155, Green Crayons wrote:sureIn post 135, yessiree wrote:What about it, can you explain?In post 107, Green Crayons wrote:for whatever he's doing with Dragons
it looks like trying to create suspicions over things that are not suspicious or even ai
that it's done to help support/protect DMG also pings
Spoiler: posts
I don't think it needs to be pointed out either that he's actually defending std here where as yes was only answering things
anyways asking a filler question then dipping is scummy because std had no actual thoughts of their own and their question seemed pointless, they also never followed up on it which I don't like
green keeps his view within only yes/myselfIn post 167, Green Crayons wrote:hm.In post 159, yessiree wrote:well, I found it odd how STD (...dragons? save?) chose to explain the reason for his lack of followup instead of just following up on dark magician, cause that seemed a bit too self-conscious for a townie
VOTE: DMG
and he's given no legitimate reasons to at this point.
~60 posts later makes up a poor reason to keep his suspicion on me which is pretty obviously made up because we've had and voiced scum reads at this point. The idea we'd be struggling to come up with suspicions is not true at all except for this isolated post. He's apparently been paying attention to our slot based on his interest in us but he can't come up with anything except isolating one post to try to call it badIn post 246, Green Crayons wrote:disagree. it reminds me of when i'm scum and it's hard to come up with bs suspicions, so i make a unoffensive observation postIn post 226, Lukewarm wrote:But their last post has changed that view a bit for me. Moving them to the "leaning town" category