In post 1003, NDMath wrote:Agree That Enchant/Kitty appear scum/scum.
samantha was against kitty (hard enough). but u consider she can be a scum... with kitty? i don't like itIn post 1003, NDMath wrote:VOTE: samantha97
In post 1003, NDMath wrote:Agree That Enchant/Kitty appear scum/scum.
samantha was against kitty (hard enough). but u consider she can be a scum... with kitty? i don't like itIn post 1003, NDMath wrote:VOTE: samantha97
What did I miss?In post 1201, Marky Mark wrote:not when that claim is a 180 on a previous claim
Recoverable in 2 minutes.In post 1194, Vasex wrote:I forgot my account password guys
Because I can only use night 1 and night 2.In post 1199, Marky Mark wrote:I am doubling down on T3 here - the 180 on the claim when pressured to reveal his thought process seems fishy to me, and I've literally seen scum pull this one before (Flavour Leaf in Bending).
Also, if legit, why would he reveal his gate and give scum free info rather than just saying that he is some sort of cop?
I really don't believe a player would trade one for with someone about to be elim'd?In post 1018, Cabd wrote:Also self meta wifom but there's no way scum-me wasn't lurking like fuck and woulda lolhammered the wagon when it was at L-1 to trade one for one. Unless of course you were to think I'm scum WITH kitty?
Mafia would know whether or not there is a traitor.In post 1111, Enchant wrote:As mafia, i have zero motivation to remove bp, because he could be traitor.
Windows and you proposed the possibility but Windows is being very confident that one implies the other.In post 1121, Kerset wrote:but it is not enchant, who started this. It was Windows & myself.In post 1110, Nero Cain wrote:could enchant just be scum here? like this whole "he's a claimed bp, git him!" like there's a lot of scum motivation in wanting to get a bp out of the way. And the "he's unlikely to be town bp!" is just kinda slimy. Also I don't have to be on a wagon with DGB and Andre!
VOTE: enchant
?? I am very confused by this, can you elaborate?In post 1139, samantha97 wrote:VOTE: t3
not comfortable leaving a d1 bulletproof claim alive, and not because of traitor
Reason Relating to Ongoing games.Vasex wrote: ugh (2)
i knocked against this sentance again
wtf man?
how can you be sure about that?
why are you defending her this strange way?
just look at her ISO
That is your gate. Why give that info away?In post 1207, T3 wrote:Because I can only use night 1 and night 2.
T3 claimed BP under mild pressure then when asked for their reason for claiming subsequently claimed N1/N2 CopIn post 1204, DrippingGoofball wrote:What did I miss?In post 1201, Marky Mark wrote:not when that claim is a 180 on a previous claim
I don't quite follow sorry.In post 1210, Vasex wrote:bp-"traitor" changes his claim to a cop
is this not too dangerous for the traitor? to bite the bullet at himself, not in some townie...
In post 1210, Vasex wrote:bp-"traitor" changes his claim to a cop
is this not too dangerous for the traitor? to bite the bullet at himself, not in some townie...
In post 885, Vasex wrote: huh, i know that thing, that it is convinient for mafia to claim like pr in dangerous situations, especially when they almost have no choice.
i know that easy to believe that fake, because pr often acts like a mafia for townies, having a big important role and afraid to lose it.
but i dont believe kitty now.
i dont believe any of his words.
I would never CC cop in large game. Especially shot based, as there can be more then one per game.In post 1223, Vasex wrote:If you was a cop would you instantly contrclaimed against mafia Kitty? Think about it. Before the first night!