did you happen to catch the many times this was disproven or were you too busy "juicin"In post 3727, VFP wrote:(assumed VT)?
also: will it help if i ask what your case is on osuka from an outside perspective? because i'm looking and i still don't really understand why you're so convinced he's scum. you've had a hard scumread on him since, like, page 7 or something. there was the bit about how you didn't understand/see merit in some of his posts early on (editor's note: 1835) and how he was being caustic -- i agree he was unnecessarily hostile in response to a simple request for clarification, but toxicity isn't really AI to me.
249 is you saying "i'm gonna tunnel you without regard for your good posts, only your mistakes" which is. literally just what scum do
you ask about where osuka is directly engaging with players but he's been doing that all game so that doesn't really apply anymore
your scumpool in 642 is 3 conftown and osuka, 2 of whom are now dead which is. interesting
this is just turning into an iso skim now but you get the point
everything past this point just seems to be inflammatory insults from both sides and a restatement of the assertion that osuka is "doing nothing" and being "a juicer". what is your case? are you just keeping your promises from 249? i'm not trying to ask this in bad faith but i'm having a hard time thinking you're actually looking at this player's post history objectively