In post 3774, InsidiousLemons wrote:also thank you for the chart it's incredibly helpful
Which TPR do you think you are paired with?
In post 3774, InsidiousLemons wrote:also thank you for the chart it's incredibly helpful
i'm pretty sure it is literally impossible for there to only be one scum amongst the claims. good info otherwise, but let me be more specific: what is it about the scenario where i'm town that would make Dk scum?In post 3784, clidd wrote:Unless there is only one scum between claims.
In that case, you could both be town (and the scumteam would look like Asteria + Osuka + Andres)
pedit: I don't see you two as S | S, but this is a personal interpretation of mine. I feel that the way you talked about them did not strike me as an approach about a scum partner (in the scum!you scenario).
@pooky i wouldn't mind your earnest take on thisIn post 3776, InsidiousLemons wrote:does 2489 really strike you as possible from a salsa whoknowsyou didn't kill anyone the previous night? and does a salsa with this partially-absolving information on you, who was suspicious enough of you on D1 to emphatically state "you're scum!" (1524), withhold it the next day?
I'm not sure what you assuming VT there from a Vanilla read is bad for? You got a Vanilla read and assumed VT. Thats not wrong, that's exactly what happened to what you're claiming. If I was a rolecop with that result on a GS I would also do the same.In post 3750, InsidiousLemons wrote:did you happen to catch the many times this was disproven or were you too busy "juicin"In post 3727, VFP wrote:(assumed VT)?
also: will it help if i ask what your case is on osuka from an outside perspective? because i'm looking and i still don't really understand why you're so convinced he's scum. you've had a hard scumread on him since, like, page 7 or something. there was the bit about how you didn't understand/see merit in some of his posts early on (editor's note: 1835) and how he was being caustic -- i agree he was unnecessarily hostile in response to a simple request for clarification, but toxicity isn't really AI to me.
249 is you saying "i'm gonna tunnel you without regard for your good posts, only your mistakes" which is. literally just what scum do
you ask about where osuka is directly engaging with players but he's been doing that all game so that doesn't really apply anymore
your scumpool in 642 is 3 conftown and osuka, 2 of whom are now dead which is. interesting
this is just turning into an iso skim now but you get the point
everything past this point just seems to be inflammatory insults from both sides and a restatement of the assertion that osuka is "doing nothing" and being "a juicer". what is your case? are you just keeping your promises from 249? i'm not trying to ask this in bad faith but i'm having a hard time thinking you're actually looking at this player's post history objectively
Why would traitor RB their own team?In post 3769, InsidiousLemons wrote:p-edit i don't really have an eye for balance but mafia doctor + mafia goon + mafia traitor roleblocker could actually be argued to be more plausible, since it would remove the ability for the mafia to coordinate a roleblock and open up the possibility for the doctor themself to get rb'd
I think Lemons is trying to push as a town tell for this and it just makes me think scum more.In post 3772, InsidiousLemons wrote:wait nevermind that second point i keep forgetting the traitor knows who the mafia are i promise i'm not trying to dumbtell
p-edit ah fuck okay lemme reread