In post 278, Et Al wrote:What did you think I was doing in
266 and
273?
I mean I'm being more snarky than I could be, so if you think it's inhibiting comprehension, I can tone it down. But I feel like I've been engaging with the claims that I objected to (such as yours, and earlier mastina's).
-S
I thought that you were responding to concerns about your alignment with what essentially amounted to “you’re obviously wrong, duuuh! Why are you even saying that?”
Just in different words.
For example your question to me has an obvious answer. You were confidently stating in your post that the alleged LAMIST was NAI.
Your question to Nexus had an even more obvious answer. You asked why he brought up the LAMIST. I think it’s pretty easy to infer that he thought it was relevant for your alignment.
So you didn’t actually need to ask these questions to clarify our motivations. So then why ask them? My current hypothesis is that you’re scum trying to look busy and as if you’re engaging and bothered by people suspecting you (which you would be regardless of your alignment, to be fair).
And this is because your engagement is superficial and hollow, as if you are trying to replicate what you would do as town but haven’t quite found that groove and are getting frustrated that it’s not working out.
I am prepared to be wrong, but those are my current thoughts.