on the other hand, ew @ thisIn post 113, ProfessorDrapion wrote:NGL.
I didn’t notice that till you pointed it out.
VOTE: professor
still not a fan of Pooky ftr
on the other hand, ew @ thisIn post 113, ProfessorDrapion wrote:NGL.
I didn’t notice that till you pointed it out.
that's... not his suggestion though?In post 123, Lukewarm wrote:Yeah. I am actually suspicious of Bingle making the suggestion for the psych to automatically out a guilty result. Because imo, that seems more likely to out the sitter then to out mafia.In post 120, Dannflor wrote:Lukewarm, do you have any non-pokemon related thoughts on any players yet?
I think that they know that too, because they were in the Open Setup review of the game that the mod linked to in the first post, and there they talked about the Psych having "a fake inno and a fake guilty on a questionable reliability investigative."
So from my PoV, Bingle came out with some anti-town advice, and then said for no one to question them
Why do you think that?In post 115, Dannflor wrote:Drapion, I think T3 is town
This is what I’m “ew” on?In post 125, Gypyx wrote:on the other hand, ew @ thisIn post 113, ProfessorDrapion wrote:NGL.
I didn’t notice that till you pointed it out.
VOTE: professor
still not a fan of Pooky ftr
Let me give you a quick rundown on how Bingle do.In post 123, Lukewarm wrote:Yeah. I am actually suspicious of Bingle making the suggestion for the psych to automatically out a guilty result. Because imo, that seems more likely to out the sitter then to out mafia.In post 120, Dannflor wrote:Lukewarm, do you have any non-pokemon related thoughts on any players yet?
I think that they know that too, because they were in the Open Setup review of the game that the mod linked to in the first post, and there they talked about the Psych having "a fake inno and a fake guilty on a questionable reliability investigative."
So from my PoV, Bingle came out with some anti-town advice, and then said for no one to question them
Ah, speak of the monkey and he doth appear.In post 114, Almost50 wrote:I am still debating whether to play to the meta some (older) players know, or the one I want to revert to.
So another words.In post 130, Almost50 wrote:Hey, everyone.. I have a confession to make: this player list is so awesome I dare not post as much as it would disturb the flow of my own entertainment. I am reading though, so don't think otherwise.
That is like the third most compelling reason to wagon him!In post 125, Gypyx wrote:on the other hand, ew @ thisIn post 113, ProfessorDrapion wrote:NGL.
I didn’t notice that till you pointed it out.
VOTE: professor
still not a fan of Pooky ftr
I do have to comment on this though:In post 117, Lukewarm wrote:I am actually a little confused how the psychologist role helps us in this set up.
If he can get a "can kill" result on the baby sitter, but gets a "not able to kill" result on the cowardly mafia + any mafia that has already committed a kill, then on day 1 wouldn't a "can kill" result be a 50/50 chance at being the babysitter or mafia. And then starting on Day 2, they will basically be getting "is babysitter" and "is not babysitter" results, right?
That makes me question this advice given by BingleIn post 33, Bingle wrote:Optimal play is for baby to target Allen and Allen to aim for scrum.
We all pseudoclaim a psych inno D2 and maybe later day phases on the basis of how kills pan out.psych claims immediately if has guilty
just the way you apparently take this seriously without doing the appropriate actions in that case (a vote)In post 128, ProfessorDrapion wrote:This is what I’m “ew” on?In post 125, Gypyx wrote:on the other hand, ew @ thisIn post 113, ProfessorDrapion wrote:NGL.
I didn’t notice that till you pointed it out.
VOTE: professor
still not a fan of Pooky ftr
I could probably give you like 3 others posts I’ve made that is more “ew” then that one.
Like can you explain?
Feels like your just trying to reach for a reason to vote me.
Despite the fact that I am townreading Dann, I endorse this gif and it's message.In post 111, Menalque wrote:In post 105, ProfessorDrapion wrote:So your telling me you think this:In post 100, Menalque wrote:*announcer voice*
And yes, that’s dannflor entering the thread folks, ooh, it’s not off to a good start! How many yikes out of 5 is that judges?
4/5 yikes! Hoo boy, that’s a lot of yikes for dannflor’s entrance!
Is more yikes then this:In post 84, Dannflor wrote:guys gypyx and bingle are scum together
The "abrasive enough to double down on a scumslip to make it look likeIn post 122, VFP wrote:That's a good point, but the question is, what scum am I?In post 112, Almost50 wrote:The quoted post is literally a scum claim.
I am, actually. How do you know the alignment of a Teddy Bear from a single post with 3 letters: ego?? That's for instance.In post 124, Gypyx wrote:pls tell me you're not serious
I take it you're referring to Menalque? I think he's clear.. or at least he appears to be so far.In post 131, Bingle wrote:Could you do me a teensy favor and devote investigative energy at the other pirate? I am concerned that he's tailoring his play to appeal to me and I'm unsure how to read into that. Thank you.
I said I didn’t notice it to be consider that way. If you read my ISO you will know I GT’ed VFP.In post 135, Gypyx wrote:just the way you apparently take this seriously without doing the appropriate actions in that case (a vote)In post 128, ProfessorDrapion wrote:This is what I’m “ew” on?In post 125, Gypyx wrote:on the other hand, ew @ thisIn post 113, ProfessorDrapion wrote:NGL.
I didn’t notice that till you pointed it out.
VOTE: professor
still not a fan of Pooky ftr
I could probably give you like 3 others posts I’ve made that is more “ew” then that one.
Like can you explain?
Feels like your just trying to reach for a reason to vote me.
but hey, what do you think is scummier than that and for what reasons now that you're on the topic?
As my good pal Colin Hay once said: Sometimes I dunno.. which way tooooo gooooooooooIn post 132, ProfessorDrapion wrote:So another words.In post 130, Almost50 wrote:Hey, everyone.. I have a confession to make: this player list is so awesome I dare not post as much as it would disturb the flow of my own entertainment. I am reading though, so don't think otherwise.
You Be Lurkin!
Explain your VFP read.In post 138, Bingle wrote:Town:
Dannflor
T3
PookyTheMagicalBear
Almost50
Needs more content before being arbitrarily shuffled into a pile:
GrandpaMo
ManWithNoName
Pine
Scum:
Lukewarm
VFP
Menalque
ProfessorDrapion
Gypyx
Yes. All nine of those are genuine reads with genuine reasoning. I'm not going to bother explaining most of them at the moment, and they're loosely ordered based on how accurate my gut says they might be.
Aye. The things he's doing feel town to me, but they're also exactly the things I would expect Mena to do to try to pocket me. Particularly: Early SR on me and going after Dann right out of the gate are things I think Mena is aware I'm likely to TR.In post 140, Almost50 wrote:I take it you're referring to Menalque? I think he's clear.. or at least he appears to be so far.In post 131, Bingle wrote:Could you do me a teensy favor and devote investigative energy at the other pirate? I am concerned that he's tailoring his play to appeal to me and I'm unsure how to read into that. Thank you.
You didn’t mention them before here so I’m curious your reasonings.In post 99, Bingle wrote:Mena slightly scummy, pooky low priority, your slot has tells but I need to wait for the psych evaluation result to determine if they’re scummy or towny. Dann strongest townread. I’d be voting lukewarm if I weren’t voting gypyx, but I think the gypyx wagon is more likely to be spicy atm.In post 96, ProfessorDrapion wrote:Now Bingle, got any other early reads?
You?
Entrance was aggressively meh, seems to be moderately around and yet is only addressing topics that don't really have substance.In post 143, ProfessorDrapion wrote:Explain your VFP read.
I have never played a game with Bingle, so I guess I will take your work for it for now. His advice doesn't really come into play until day 2 anyways, so we can talk about it then.In post 134, Almost50 wrote:I do have to comment on this though:In post 117, Lukewarm wrote:I am actually a little confused how the psychologist role helps us in this set up.
If he can get a "can kill" result on the baby sitter, but gets a "not able to kill" result on the cowardly mafia + any mafia that has already committed a kill, then on day 1 wouldn't a "can kill" result be a 50/50 chance at being the babysitter or mafia. And then starting on Day 2, they will basically be getting "is babysitter" and "is not babysitter" results, right?
That makes me question this advice given by BingleIn post 33, Bingle wrote:Optimal play is for baby to target Allen and Allen to aim for scrum.
We all pseudoclaim a psych inno D2 and maybe later day phases on the basis of how kills pan out.psych claims immediately if has guilty
@Luke:REGARDLESS OF HIS ALIGNMENT; you should always treat Bingle's mech talk as gospel. It is accurate and indeed best play for Town. End of discussion.
Note: The above is not limited to this game. It does apply here but is a general rule of the thumb.
is this lile that game where you have to make everyone else guess the word without actually saying itIn post 130, Almost50 wrote:Hey, everyone.. I have a confession to make: this player list is so awesome I dare not post as much as it would disturb the flow of my own entertainment. I am reading though, so don't think otherwise.