In post 596, T3 wrote:I am really really really gut/meta/vibe scumreading pooky.
Drap has incurred the wrath of the milktank(!?)
crazy how no one fucking sees u as scum.
you deadass vote right after everyone voted and sheeped literally everyone
In post 596, T3 wrote:I am really really really gut/meta/vibe scumreading pooky.
Drap has incurred the wrath of the milktank(!?)
whats the vc? am i hammer?In post 601, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:gramps nbodo ywill blame you lets go
Teel deer:In post 542, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:This is the proper format:
Drap is town because ___________
^ the reason used here should be your strongest reason.
I'm considering it.In post 593, Not_Mafia wrote:Bingle, wouldn't it be so random if you just like, voted Drapion right now?
Drap is E-2, but N_M will hammer whatever wagon hits E-1.In post 602, GrandpaMo wrote:whats the vc? am i hammer?In post 601, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:gramps nbodo ywill blame you lets go
I'm a fruit hanging an inch off the ground. Nothing new.In post 600, GrandpaMo wrote:In post 596, T3 wrote:I am really really really gut/meta/vibe scumreading pooky.
Drap has incurred the wrath of the milktank(!?)
crazy how no one fucking sees u as scum.
you deadass vote right after everyone voted and sheeped literally everyone
that is false. you are misleading it in a way to make it seem like oh I find drap scum but there are more people scummier so I am not voting them. yes i only agreed only 2 specific parts that came out scummy and that was in the beginning and one towards the end and I explained it in there, however I went on how their reads felt genuine and they were in a towny mindset trying to solve the gamesolve, acquiring a townread from me. Then I went on to explain my scumread and how they should be the viable vote rather than Drap and I explained it in the interactions which may from your perspective may have misunderstood.In post 604, Bingle wrote:Teel deer:In post 542, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:This is the proper format:
Drap is town because ___________
^ the reason used here should be your strongest reason.
Antiassociatives and gamestate read.
GPa agrees that Drap is nominally scummy on play, but thinks there are bigger fish to fry who are not S/S with Drap.
There is nothing in the original post that links the two pairs tho. Like the only thing I can see is that you happened to right me on the left side of my pairing and you also happened to right drap on the left side of his pair. But I don't see why you could not have just as easily written the pairs asIn post 592, GrandpaMo wrote:In post 582, Lukewarm wrote:I would like further clarity from Grandpa about this. Like I see where two claims in your first sentence can lead to the orange and blue sections. Me and T3 crossvoted, so you don't think we could be partners. Gpyx and ProfessorD crossvoted, so you don't think they could be partners.In post 568, GrandpaMo wrote:i still think there is one between luke + t3 and gypyx + drap.
if drap flips scum then gypyx is most likely town.
if drap flips town then gypyx is most likely scum.
if luke flips scum then t3 is most likely town
if luke flips town then t3 is most likelytown.{I think you meant scum here}
this would imply that gypyx + t3 are same allignment and luke + drap are same allignment.
im still iffy on luke. yes i did say my solve is luke, t3, gypyx, but using my logic; it wouldn't work out propely. it would make t3 + gypyx scum and luke + drap town.
the only time luke would be in the reads if it is luke, drap = scum and that makes t3 + gpyyx town now.
pine is also another viable scumslot that has not been explored yet.
But where is the red coming from? How are gypyx and T3 linked? How are me and ProfessorD linked? I mean, me and ProfessorD also crossvoted, so unless you are using some logic that I am missing, this pairing seems inconsistent with your anti-partner logic you used before.
would like clarity plz
thanks for catching that. i actually did mean scum lol. you would know because you are scum
in all seriousness though, it should make sense because from the orange and blue... i am not using individuality anymore but looking more of pairs and thinking that now bussing is a viable option... there is def a scene here for that scenerio to play out. i even said i was still iffy on you because from my logic if drap flipped town it would mean you are town as well and THAT read comes from the T3 + luke pairing
Yeah. In a game with Not Mafia, intent to E-1 is the basically the same as intent to hammer.In post 606, Bingle wrote:Drap is E-2, but N_M will hammer whatever wagon hits E-1.In post 602, GrandpaMo wrote:whats the vc? am i hammer?In post 601, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:gramps nbodo ywill blame you lets go
I townread them based on individuality. I feel like if I were doing that, then that would have been an elebarote way of bussing where you give contextual interactions on why you townread them but you scumread them individual because YOU have to since they are being hammered her. However, I am not doing that. I am flat right out defending them because of I townread them and I gave the analysis right after I went on with the Gypyx + Drap interaction, even giving you post numbers on his towniness. To answer your question, yes while I do see why you scumread them, I don't find that scum indicitivate of them and find reasons why I townread them etc if that makes sense.In post 611, Bingle wrote:I'm saying that you think Drap looks scummy, but that because of the things around him you think he is actually town.
You did have things you townread him for based on his own play, I will admit that. I think they are not town indicative things and thus largely ignored them. For example, you think Drap's tr on me makes drap likely town when I think townreading me is actually fairly sketchy from him. If you put more weight behind those things than I thought I apologize, but I assumed given the title of the case that the contextual clues were more important to you and pooky was looking for a "Strongest reason".
Am I wrong that you see what drap has done as something that is reasonable to scumread? (That's what is meant by nominally scummy, btw)
Honestly I am so damn busy RN IDRC if I get ML’ed at this point.In post 614, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:maybe your scumreads r bussing
what r we waiting for at this point?
In post 612, Lukewarm wrote:There is nothing in the original post that links the two pairs tho. Like the only thing I can see is that you happened to right me on the left side of my pairing and you also happened to right drap on the left side of his pair. But I don't see why you could not have just as easily written the pairs asIn post 592, GrandpaMo wrote:In post 582, Lukewarm wrote:I would like further clarity from Grandpa about this. Like I see where two claims in your first sentence can lead to the orange and blue sections. Me and T3 crossvoted, so you don't think we could be partners. Gpyx and ProfessorD crossvoted, so you don't think they could be partners.In post 568, GrandpaMo wrote:i still think there is one between luke + t3 and gypyx + drap.
if drap flips scum then gypyx is most likely town.
if drap flips town then gypyx is most likely scum.
if luke flips scum then t3 is most likely town
if luke flips town then t3 is most likelytown.{I think you meant scum here}
this would imply that gypyx + t3 are same allignment and luke + drap are same allignment.
im still iffy on luke. yes i did say my solve is luke, t3, gypyx, but using my logic; it wouldn't work out propely. it would make t3 + gypyx scum and luke + drap town.
the only time luke would be in the reads if it is luke, drap = scum and that makes t3 + gpyyx town now.
pine is also another viable scumslot that has not been explored yet.
But where is the red coming from? How are gypyx and T3 linked? How are me and ProfessorD linked? I mean, me and ProfessorD also crossvoted, so unless you are using some logic that I am missing, this pairing seems inconsistent with your anti-partner logic you used before.
would like clarity plz
thanks for catching that. i actually did mean scum lol. you would know because you are scum
in all seriousness though, it should make sense because from the orange and blue... i am not using individuality anymore but looking more of pairs and thinking that now bussing is a viable option... there is def a scene here for that scenerio to play out. i even said i was still iffy on you because from my logic if drap flipped town it would mean you are town as well and THAT read comes from the T3 + luke pairing
You have not provided any logic to cross reference the pairs the way you did, and not ^^this^^ way. Which is the way I think the same pairs play out, since I town read gypyx and scum read t3+drap.
In post 617, ProfessorDrapion wrote:I’m no PR so it doesn’t really matter too too much.
I’m also in another game and it’s hard to do both with so much working IRL.
lol this flips townIn post 618, ProfessorDrapion wrote:*Intent to hammer myself when it comes to that point*
Sorry guys, hope you don’t call me names after I flip the Green.
I’m just really busy.
Oh. Okay then. Dead thread here I come!In post 617, ProfessorDrapion wrote:I’m no PR so it doesn’t really matter too too much.
I’m also in another game and it’s hard to do both with so much working IRL.
Not really offended, as much as just confused lolIn post 620, GrandpaMo wrote:honestly i see this as you getting offended to being paired with drap...
bingle NM is not awake this early in the morning lolIn post 622, Bingle wrote:Oh. Okay then. Dead thread here I come!In post 617, ProfessorDrapion wrote:I’m no PR so it doesn’t really matter too too much.
I’m also in another game and it’s hard to do both with so much working IRL.
VOTE: drap