In post 623, Lukewarm wrote:Not really offended, as much as just confused lolIn post 620, GrandpaMo wrote:honestly i see this as you getting offended to being paired with drap...
And I remained confused until you spelled out how you came to your that conclusion. I am sorry to say that I think that the logic you used is a bit nonsensical, and that is why I did not understand right away.
--You created two pairs (T3/Me) and (gypyx/Drap), and I saw you point out the interactions that made you pair us off this way, so I'm following along to this point.
--Then you looked at the pairs, and you think that T3 is more likely in T3/Luke pair and you think that gypyx is more likely in the gypyx/drap pair, fair enough.
--So you concluded that you believe that T3+gypyx are a scum team. I am still following you to this point, so we are all good up to here
But then your next step is where I think you should reexamine your logic.
But then concluded that if you are wrong on one of the pairs, you must be wrong on the other one, and would flip your entire scum team instead of just flipping that slot. And that just... doesn't make any sense to me...
I brought it up because I was confused, but I think I understand how you drew your conclusions, even through I don't like your logic. So there is no need to bac and forth over this right now. We can cross this bridge once we get to the point that someone out of t3/me/drap/gypyx flips
i just saw this sorry. fwiw flipping only one slot would just include bias imo. thats why its more probable that the whole pair flips together nd thats based on the interactions you pointed out.
like you said, there is no need for this back and forth. this is how I see it from MY perspective. interactions/pairings are hard to explain when you have it in your mind at one point and trying to place it on text. i tried to draw it by highlighting a simple chart to give you a better understanding.
