????In post 673, Kazyan wrote:Oh, right. I was stuck on the "she's postingIn post 671, Nero Cain wrote:Did you read 629? She also kinda left after ppl got tired of all the shit/fluff posting and its not a great look either.too much" sentiment rather than the patterns of what she was doing. This is a good observation and I think you're town.
1. Anda can confirm that All caps of scumminess is my jokeIn post 674, Nero Cain wrote:In post 668, flow trap wrote:When did I seriously call you scum?In post 665, Nero Cain wrote:I mostly suspect flow trap for calling me scum but not voting me and I think that's a scummy thing to do.so now you are retroactively calling this a joke?In post 467, flow trap wrote:Nero is literally the definition of all caps of scumminess
were you serious about calling me a suspect?In post 535, flow trap wrote:Pfft, I have actual vote control I'll say it again, I don't always vote my suspectsIn post 530, Nero Cain wrote:but you didn't even vote your enemy, horrible use of ammo.In post 513, flow trap wrote:Not voting is sus
My read on her is "I don't know". I think it's unlikely that scum would commit so hard to fluff-walling so early in the game, but I can't rule it out. She also sort of deflected onto the anti-fluff-wallers. There are scummy bits and pieces, but they don't cohere well into an image of scummy play for me.
In post 680, Andante wrote:#NotMyGeneral
I had a very bad migraine yesterday and made the post when I was reading and sleep wasn't working, I was a lot more irritable than usual. Knowing that it's Isis though, I get it all now. Just some random alt making posts like they had any experience with me just set me off.In post 353, unwnd wrote:What has you so high-strung? This seems a bit incessantly wordy over a brief observationIn post 314, xofelf wrote:Nah, I think you're gonna need to explain more why of all the fluffposting that happened at the start, you decided mine was the one you should pay most attention to and get an alignment read on. Unless you're doing your catchup by ISO, which sure you do you. I just legitimately liked that it was big font. I glaze over on text when I'm reading a lot of it if it's not bold or larger than the rest, I just really liked it and wanted to say so. With it all being fluff, *all* thoughts I have at all seem worth making posts about.
How dare you kill your most honorable general!In post 684, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:dayvig: Nero Cain
It's a particular vibe of fatherliness of course.In post 435, flow trap wrote:Time for random deepness, what would you consider a "real dad?"In post 61, xofelf wrote:You're not my real dad >:(In post 57, Nero Cain wrote:YOU WILL DO AS I SAY!
You bomb my cult I kill you dead deadIn post 686, Nero Cain wrote:How dare you kill your most honorable general!In post 684, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:dayvig: Nero Cain
I both like this post as it gives me a good sense of where you're coming from, but I also like that you included yourself in the anti-posting list.In post 587, Kazyan wrote:I understand the anti-Beeboy sentimnet, but since we're less than 24 hours out from the start of the game, I'm not comfortable driving that wagon yet. I feel like it's in our best interest to do that to win the game, but it makes me squicky to lean that hard into demanding that everyone be here always--this is a game where the purpose of long day phases is that youdohave time.
Anyway:
Pro-Posting:
- Anya
- Firebringer
- Andante
- Nero
- Flow Trap
- unwnd
- Chara
- Pooky? (commented on the page count, but joined the fluffiness)
- Shiro ("I am caught up")
- Murdercat (planned absence, but promised to be very present)
Ambiguous:
- Farkran
- xofelf
- Raya36
- Brave Heart Lion (has one post, but it's enthusiastic)
- Toadette
Anti-Posting:
- Dwlee
- SirCakez
- Beeboy? (has zero posts)
- Isis? (has one irrelevant post)
- Kazyan
- NorwegianboyEE
- Flea the Magician
- kdowns ("15 pages of shit")
- Save the Dragons ("holy crap there are a lot of posts")
Was this helpful? Probably not.
I'm having trouble understanding this. How did you interpret Kazyan's post? As a list of who was putting effort in? I'm confused about you saying you liked that they put themselves in the anti-posting spot when I feel like that is NAI.In post 693, xofelf wrote: P-Edit: Actually no, I didn't think it was a readslist. More like a... effort list almost? I liked it because it gave me a feel on the way in which they think. That's what I meant by where they're coming from. Just reading it, I had that sort of feel I get from people who are putting in good game effort in. I don't know if that helps to explain? Just pinged in a good way. It made me smile and have a sense of "yeah this person, they're a good and I want them to keep talking" as opposed to the other ping i get which involves much nose-wrinkling and grump.
The wagon started because they were very defensive upon a couple of votes. Now that they're posting more I'm a bit perplexed on their analysis and as Save said I feel like them and Andante could be connected.In post 694, Farkran wrote:I like how xofelf is adjusting to the gamestate instead of going back to rvs-y stuff
I just isoed them since they were top wagon and i don't understand why - if it is even a serious wagon? Which votes on xofelf are actually non-rvs scumreads?
