I think my RT was still worthwhile. Are you done voting RLotus or was that a serious vote for FMFT?In post 599, Noraa wrote:it is sooooo damn easy to see my unvote which is literally on this damn page. and its so easy to lie about something like this. there's no point in a reaction test like this.In post 596, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:Wanted to see if he knew he wasn't hammering or if he thought he'd hammered
Fact of the matter is if you're scum they're going to run away with it and I think there's a world where it's {RLotus, Italiano, Noraa}. I think far more likely is {RLotus, Italiano,In post 606, Noraa wrote:I got off before he repped in bruh and I've made it clear that I will not no lim. tf is your point? ur stupid idea that rlotus is my scum buddy is not believable at all. If I didn't want this wagon to go through, I guarantee I could do it. I don't even entirely agree with this wagon yet I'm trusting in you and letting it go through and I've brought more votes to this wagon than you. If I wanted to stop this wagon, I would've stopped it long ago.
Stop acting like the prod police it’s annoying. That’s why the game has a Mod.In post 611, Noraa wrote:Gamma, Lotus, and Andres are going to need prods soon
But you’re shading here without expressing a SR directly. If you think someone is stretching to make a point, that’s clearly Scummy.In post 479, RLotus wrote:Like this shit for example
Idk dude I feel like that's something town does when there is little information to work with. Which is why I'm not calling everyone bad or ridiculous for thinking I'm scum but stuck in a spot where people are reading me scum for nonsense and I have nothing about my play to defend I feel.In post 615, Andresvmb wrote:But you’re shading here without expressing a SR directly. If you think someone is stretching to make a point, that’s clearly Scummy.In post 479, RLotus wrote:Like this shit for example
In post 580, Noraa wrote:UNVOTE:
Lotus please claim. I don't want a lolhammer and that's the only reason I'm unvoting
In post 603, Noraa wrote:I want a claim from lotus but unless he claims pr, he's dying today
I thought you said youIn post 611, Noraa wrote:Gamma, Lotus, and Andres are going to need prods soon
I agree with the point (Gamma wanting to make sure that a point made about them was cleared up, which maybe looks defensive), but not with the conclusion that it was Scummy. That’s all. You’ve surely seen Town clear up points about themselves to eliminate any chance at a misconception that gets them wrongly executed. I think the notion that Town don’t care to get executed and Scum always work towards survival is wrong. Scum bus all the time as a strategy. Town know their alignment and some care deeply about not being mis-executed. I know I do. It’s a point of pride, actually.In post 491, ItalianoVD wrote:Why did you agree in the fact of how you felt when reading Gamma only to say, but no it’s scummy to pickup and push on that. And what was wrong with the push on Kyouko? I know you townread him but you don’t see Lukewarm’s push coming from town at all?
I don’t do reaction tests if I’m being transparent. I might conceal information to solidify a thought, or try and catch someone in a lie, but I don’t recall the last time I purposefully argued for something I didn’t believe in just to make a point or coax some information out of someone. It’s not what I typically do. I’m just not effective that way.In post 493, ItalianoVD wrote:So what was that? A reaction test or something?In post 449, Andresvmb wrote:Meh I need to UNVOTE: . I don’t really SR Italiano to be totally honest.
This I find Scum does all the time. What I call “Executions for information” type arguments are so common around here for some reason. Oh so if Kyouko flips Town that tells you what about Gamma exactly? That they were defending Town and could be White Knighting? Because that’s an option you haven’t explicitly stated but could be occurring. If you want to argue Kyouko is Scum, I think that should be the focus. If Kyouko flips Scum (and they could be!), then you move onto the next argument. Or you can separately argue Gamma is Scum. But the way this is being presented pings me hard. I want to execute a player to figure out a different player’s alignment? I’m calling bullshit.In post 527, Lukewarm wrote:So, incase anyone was interested where I am at, I am still leaning towards Kyouko for a vote today because it would give me more info on whether that really was a scum partner save from Gamma, or if Gamma really is town.