In post 898, Sigmund wrote:Exactly 3 scumbags are on this list.In post 892, unwnd wrote:Something_Smart, Toogeloo, notscience, NDMath, Lady Lambdadelta, morph the cat, Not_Mafia
Discuss who they are.
Go
Its either that or scroll forever sadly, I've tried to break it as best I can while keeping what I gotta say in thre.In post 887, Chara wrote:@Flea - you don't have to change how you post, but letting you know your post formatting is still really hard to interact with on mobile.
this sounds like a whole lot of spaghetti and meatballs ircher but. worse is that you're adding way too much sauce when there's barely and spaghettiIn post 899, Ircher wrote:1) I didn't want to unvote.In post 630, Thestatusquo wrote:I fundamentally don't understand this so I'm going to poke at it a little more.In post 625, Ircher wrote:Because I didn't want to unvote but I also want my vote to reflect the fact that I'm not the same as jjh.
1) Why didn't you want to unvote?
2) Why are you concerned with being seen as the same as the person you replaced?
2) It's not so much a concern as clarity. If I kept my vote where it was, people are naturally going to assume that my read on the slot is similar to my predecessor's read.For LLD, it's mainly 41. The game just started and yet she is already complaining about posting levels. I also don't buy the day vig soft.In post 865, Farkran wrote:Oh, how?In post 642, Ircher wrote:VOTE: LLD based off the first two pages.
Chara and Farkran have also attracted my attention.
For Chara, I think it changed votes too fast and too early, and I didn't like its phrasing in 44 when claiming not miller. I also feel that's just an unnecessary claim to make.
For Farkran, I find 45 a bit boastful and irrelevant to the game at hand. If anything, it seems almost manipulative to me.
I work for the census bureauIn post 900, notscience wrote:Hear what makes you think that first
scrolling forever would have a bigger impactIn post 901, Flea The Magician wrote:Its either that or scroll forever sadly, I've tried to break it as best I can while keeping what I gotta say in thre.In post 887, Chara wrote:@Flea - you don't have to change how you post, but letting you know your post formatting is still really hard to interact with on mobile.
miller is my favourite role, for context.In post 899, Ircher wrote:I also feel that's just an unnecessary claim to make.
the way he's approaching Titus with the "you're reacting the same way scum you did" and his overreaction to being pushed with saying he should be given a chance, and wanting them to feel bad about scumreading him, felt good to me. i'd rethink that if i saw a scum Guillotina example who reacts the same way.In post 911, Farkran wrote:@chara why guillotine town? It pinged me the other way
your avatar is my favourite in the game. i love Illumise.
I have fairly solid townreads on a majority of the movers and shakers I personally would panic about, and I just came off a game where being paranoid about handing out townreads and instead sitting by burned me and my town team.In post 856, Bingle wrote:Not really what I meant, although I see that point. I’m more looking at the player list and wondering why, given said list you’re more worried that there aren’t movers and shakers on the scum team than that there are and you aren’t seeing them.In post 855, morph the cat wrote:Frankly? What's the fun of a social deduction game if the other team rolls over and dies for you. It's a hollow victory, no?
Your thoughts are noted. If there's something you think needs my attention, feel free to ask. Otherwise, I am commenting what i can where I can.In post 876, Artemiana wrote:Scumguollotina has a much broader gameview than town guillotina and it shows.In post 825, Titus wrote:@G, Your reasoning for your scumreads is all people who have disagreed/had conflict with you on some level.
There's a whole game not centered on you. LLD Murdercat bingle fire
I feel these slots are town. You have zero comment.
You can sort outside of you. I have been hoping you do. Despite your volume, you aren't my largest scumread. I've been praying for you to give an overview of outside events so I could sort you as either petty or scummy. Your hesitation pushes the needle towards scum.
Townguillotina is much more omgussy that scumguillotina. ScumG has a better sense of when to back off
You on the other hand seem to be playing rather politically and reserved. Whats up? Lets go on a hunting trip together!
How bad was the burn?In post 917, morph the cat wrote:I have fairly solid townreads on a majority of the movers and shakers I personally would panic about, and I just came off a game where being paranoid about handing out townreads and instead sitting by burned me and my town team.In post 856, Bingle wrote:Not really what I meant, although I see that point. I’m more looking at the player list and wondering why, given said list you’re more worried that there aren’t movers and shakers on the scum team than that there are and you aren’t seeing them.In post 855, morph the cat wrote:Frankly? What's the fun of a social deduction game if the other team rolls over and dies for you. It's a hollow victory, no?
Ircher does catch up commentary.In post 909, Dunnstral wrote:So is Ircher on page 2 or 35?
I'm not buying this daycop soft tbhIn post 922, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:you goon
Omg pftIn post 923, MURDERCAT wrote:I'm not buying this daycop soft tbhIn post 922, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:you goon