Yes I agree. The specific question I'm asking was basically why are you saying you weren't aggressive because you didn't vote when you don't vote that much. In fact, this post is basically what I'm saying. You can definitely be aggressive without voting.In post 1248, morph the cat wrote:I'm a bit on the sideline of this convo, but just because we don't put votes down early and often does not mean that we're shy about making our thoughts known about players. Far from it.In post 1246, morph the cat wrote:Agree to disagree line be here, I guess. I get really annoyed when people apply emotional tags like "aggressive" when I was going out of my way to be extremely passive and patient epxlainy.In post 1243, Thestatusquo wrote:Do you think its fair to say that perhaps "whether or not you voted" is a strange line for you to use for "aggression" when you yourself have said that you vote infrequently and mostly when very sure?In post 1241, morph the cat wrote:Spoiler: Ircher Post
I dislike pretty much all of this post but especially the characterizaiton as our taking Shea to task as "agressive" when there was no vote or even intent to vote.
Also hate insisting on playing entirely on the past for multiple IRL game days. My town-ircher model I think uses new data to have a more informed and new fresh take on the early game when catching up, as to bring something new to the table.
I agree that the post wasn't aggressive and more took it as you trying to give me context, but at the same time this is the second time you've made an argument that I would describe as kind of disingenuous.
You can usually see my incoming vote from orbit well in advance of it landing.
In this case you weren't being aggressive but I just found it odd that "we didn't vote" was the specific line of defense here.