Explain how I clearly was. I think my shift from being in the game to not being in the game is pretty clear.In post 68, Roden wrote:That's true for any alignment lol. It's the fact that you said you weren't paying attention even though you clearly were is what feels off to me.
Am I shading Roden? I feel like I’m just trying address their doubts about me while assuming good faith.In post 69, T3 wrote:I lowkey don't like ramy or rodens shading of each other.
It was your response and your vote adding to a mini wagon on T3 right after he claimed Miller that just felt too convenient for you to have not read anything yet.In post 75, Rannygazoo wrote:Explain how I clearly was. I think my shift from being in the game to not being in the game is pretty clear.In post 68, Roden wrote:That's true for any alignment lol. It's the fact that you said you weren't paying attention even though you clearly were is what feels off to me.
Titus has played with me before and she can confirm that I don’t always read carefully in the beginning. Or maybe she doesn’t pay that much attention to my play, I dunno.
Actually I think that's fair.In post 76, Rannygazoo wrote:Am I shading Roden? I feel like I’m just trying address their doubts about me while assuming good faith.In post 69, T3 wrote:I lowkey don't like ramy or rodens shading of each other.
How can we both be scummy if you don't think we're both scum?In post 74, T3 wrote:excallq don't get an avatar.
It's more that I think they're both slightly scummy for that.
This looked pretty clearly like a joke to me.In post 24, excallq wrote:I am posting because it will look suspicious if I don't.
I mean hello everyone.
Can't sleep.... people are blaring their tv. And it's not even something good, it's an antiques show /jIn post 85, cw357 wrote:hi; I just got here (have been travelling)
post 24 makes excallq look very suspicious
ill do RQS in a few hours when i have computer accessability
This is a first, promising to do RQS later. Why RQS?In post 85, cw357 wrote:hi; I just got here (have been travelling)
post 24 makes excallq look very suspicious
ill do RQS in a few hours when i have computer accessability
Of all the things I saw, 24 was the most scum-indicative. It looked like nervous scum who didn’t know what to say. Joking to alleviate the nervousness is a tactic.In post 86, T3 wrote:This looked pretty clearly like a joke to me.In post 24, excallq wrote:I am posting because it will look suspicious if I don't.
I mean hello everyone.
New to forum but not new to game. If night one when literally no attention is being paid to me were enough to make me nervous scum I'd probably have given this game up long ago.In post 91, Rannygazoo wrote: Of all the things I saw, 24 was the most scum-indicative. It looked like nervous scum who didn’t know what to say. Joking to alleviate the nervousness is a tactic.
can you please make real posts?In post 84, DrippingGoofball wrote:Bug is town.
Apart from claims by myself, does anyone take seriously any claim made in the first 10 pages?In post 92, Rannygazoo wrote:Setup analysis time
@DGB you’re pretty old. Does ‘miller who was informed that there’s a macho 2-shot cop’ make sense from a balance perspective?
yesIn post 97, geraintm wrote:Apart from claims by myself, does anyone take seriously any claim made in the first 10 pages?In post 92, Rannygazoo wrote:Setup analysis time
@DGB you’re pretty old. Does ‘miller who was informed that there’s a macho 2-shot cop’ make sense from a balance perspective?
