Who are the scum on kerset’s wagon?In post 867, SirCakez wrote:I really have the strong feeling after catchup that scum are all over Kerset
- lilith
Who are the scum on kerset’s wagon?In post 867, SirCakez wrote:I really have the strong feeling after catchup that scum are all over Kerset
hell no, if other people would make those huge wallposts i would just scroll over them and play pagetoping with pooky.In post 859, xHeavenx wrote:I've loved your thoroughness recently Datisi and you've completely won me over, while you still retain some hmm I no longer think it's scummy. If other people were more engaging and less ambiguous like you I think I could read them easier but I can't. Is there anyone here that you think would intentionally veil themselves as scum? Maybe due to lack of townie thought?
ig these are fair. maybe A50 and Heaven didn't feel like that to me because I was thinking about them during catchup and earlier.In post 873, PenguinPower wrote:At the time I made that comment? Gypyx (granted town), Umlaut, xHeavenx, Almost50 were who I was thinking about.In post 849, SirCakez wrote:who are these slots? besides kerset and myself?
Dwlee, A50, GammaIn post 875, The Limit Does Not Exist wrote:Who are the scum on kerset’s wagon?In post 867, SirCakez wrote:I really have the strong feeling after catchup that scum are all over Kerset
- lilith
oh okayIn post 874, PenguinPower wrote:I hadn't read that post when I made mine......In post 864, SirCakez wrote:I already answered this when Datisi asked, bringing it back up again is pointless
Gamma has huge momentum right now. It's pretty much a building counterwagonIn post 872, SirCakez wrote:what consensus wagon? I voted A50 who has no votes and then Gamma who has two votes.In post 871, xHeavenx wrote:Cakez is really scummy here and I'm disappointed his wagon fell off. What's townie about someone who comes back and votes consensus wagon in the middle of an apparent catchup? Don't you care about your own thoughts and how they could change based on unknown information? Apparently not.
and I always place votes and stuff while catching up because it reflects my thoughts while reading
but what does a50 have to do with votes on me?In post 852, SirCakez wrote:I changed my mind bc of the Kerset vote
Gamma is where the wind is currently blowing, since several people are scumreading him and very few are townreading himIn post 872, SirCakez wrote:what consensus wagon? I voted A50 who has no votes and then Gamma who has two votes.In post 871, xHeavenx wrote:Cakez is really scummy here and I'm disappointed his wagon fell off. What's townie about someone who comes back and votes consensus wagon in the middle of an apparent catchup? Don't you care about your own thoughts and how they could change based on unknown information? Apparently not.
and I always place votes and stuff while catching up because it reflects my thoughts while reading
You and Tigerente both on Gamma.In post 866, SirCakez wrote:so who are the scum buddies on counterwagons if you think this is the case?In post 863, Dwlee99 wrote:If the scum are already on counterwagons what are you expecting? All of the scum jumping up and down and saying "no vote this person instead!!"?In post 853, SirCakez wrote:if the wagons were on scum presumably we'd see counterwagon attempts, no?In post 851, Dwlee99 wrote:I feel like the game stalling on a wagon is not normally indicative that they are on town??
I'm glad you're back dudeIn post 870, SirCakez wrote:hi I'm back so you can stop vomiting crap about me avoiding the thread
It was meant to be funny :<In post 884, Datisi wrote:kerset criticizing my posting style while he himself is either lurking or active lurking is hilarious ngl
Where is the "huge momentum"? This is such a misrep and objectively false.In post 880, xHeavenx wrote:Gamma has huge momentum right now. It's pretty much a building counterwagonIn post 872, SirCakez wrote:what consensus wagon? I voted A50 who has no votes and then Gamma who has two votes.In post 871, xHeavenx wrote:Cakez is really scummy here and I'm disappointed his wagon fell off. What's townie about someone who comes back and votes consensus wagon in the middle of an apparent catchup? Don't you care about your own thoughts and how they could change based on unknown information? Apparently not.
and I always place votes and stuff while catching up because it reflects my thoughts while reading
What does this matter anyways? Your vote doesn't need to be justified to me, because if you think it's the right one I should be able to get that from your posts. I don't, I just see you vying for relevancy as you driveby numerous topics, eventually leading to a non-committal vote.
He voted you and i think it's a bad vote that I don't think he'd make as townIn post 881, Kerset wrote:but what does a50 have to do with votes on me?In post 852, SirCakez wrote:I changed my mind bc of the Kerset vote
In post 692, SirCakez wrote:And using that to push me is incredibly disingenuous because [redacted]
No you responded because you care too much about your image and not what your posts are actually bringing to the table.In post 889, SirCakez wrote:Where is the "huge momentum"? This is such a misrep and objectively false.In post 880, xHeavenx wrote:Gamma has huge momentum right now. It's pretty much a building counterwagonIn post 872, SirCakez wrote:what consensus wagon? I voted A50 who has no votes and then Gamma who has two votes.In post 871, xHeavenx wrote:Cakez is really scummy here and I'm disappointed his wagon fell off. What's townie about someone who comes back and votes consensus wagon in the middle of an apparent catchup? Don't you care about your own thoughts and how they could change based on unknown information? Apparently not.
and I always place votes and stuff while catching up because it reflects my thoughts while reading
What does this matter anyways? Your vote doesn't need to be justified to me, because if you think it's the right one I should be able to get that from your posts. I don't, I just see you vying for relevancy as you driveby numerous topics, eventually leading to a non-committal vote.
I responded because it's bullshit you're spewing and it needs to be called out.
As usualIn post 885, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:I'm glad you're back dudeIn post 870, SirCakez wrote:hi I'm back so you can stop vomiting crap about me avoiding the thread
it would be boring af to kill you while you weren't here
How are you getting this when you're not even broadly defining why these three make sense? It just seems so fake I'm sorry.In post 878, SirCakez wrote:Dwlee, A50, GammaIn post 875, The Limit Does Not Exist wrote:Who are the scum on kerset’s wagon?In post 867, SirCakez wrote:I really have the strong feeling after catchup that scum are all over Kerset
- lilith
buddy if you do that town thing you do then I'll get your back
LmaoIn post 892, xHeavenx wrote:No you responded because you care too much about your image and not what your posts are actually bringing to the table.In post 889, SirCakez wrote:Where is the "huge momentum"? This is such a misrep and objectively false.In post 880, xHeavenx wrote:Gamma has huge momentum right now. It's pretty much a building counterwagonIn post 872, SirCakez wrote:what consensus wagon? I voted A50 who has no votes and then Gamma who has two votes.In post 871, xHeavenx wrote:Cakez is really scummy here and I'm disappointed his wagon fell off. What's townie about someone who comes back and votes consensus wagon in the middle of an apparent catchup? Don't you care about your own thoughts and how they could change based on unknown information? Apparently not.
and I always place votes and stuff while catching up because it reflects my thoughts while reading
What does this matter anyways? Your vote doesn't need to be justified to me, because if you think it's the right one I should be able to get that from your posts. I don't, I just see you vying for relevancy as you driveby numerous topics, eventually leading to a non-committal vote.
I responded because it's bullshit you're spewing and it needs to be called out.
I agree with heaven so don’t think it’s a misrep. What makes you say gamma is not a building counterwagon?In post 889, SirCakez wrote:Where is the "huge momentum"? This is such a misrep and objectively false.In post 880, xHeavenx wrote:Gamma has huge momentum right now. It's pretty much a building counterwagonIn post 872, SirCakez wrote:what consensus wagon? I voted A50 who has no votes and then Gamma who has two votes.In post 871, xHeavenx wrote:Cakez is really scummy here and I'm disappointed his wagon fell off. What's townie about someone who comes back and votes consensus wagon in the middle of an apparent catchup? Don't you care about your own thoughts and how they could change based on unknown information? Apparently not.
and I always place votes and stuff while catching up because it reflects my thoughts while reading
What does this matter anyways? Your vote doesn't need to be justified to me, because if you think it's the right one I should be able to get that from your posts. I don't, I just see you vying for relevancy as you driveby numerous topics, eventually leading to a non-committal vote.
I responded because it's bullshit you're spewing and it needs to be called out.
You've been talking to Unwnd and Cabd too muchIn post 896, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:buddy if you do that town thing you do then I'll get your back