On mobile it’s hard to doIn post 90, Jessica Rabbit wrote:This is a first, promising to do RQS later. Why RQS?In post 85, cw357 wrote:hi; I just got here (have been travelling)
post 24 makes excallq look very suspicious
ill do RQS in a few hours when i have computer accessability
Where I’m from they do rqsIn post 99, Egix96 wrote:Don't bother. RQS is a scumtell anywayIn post 85, cw357 wrote:ill do RQS in a few hours
Mainly DGB and Ranny. They haven't really done anything pro-town, like scumhunting. Granted, it's only Day 1, but still. DBG especially just wanted T3 out to 'validate information' and 'make sure a miller doesn't make it to endgame.'In post 269, Titus wrote:Who are your suspects then Jake?
Well, it just kinda came out of nowhere and exploded onto the town's discourse. I think this is because some scum had TMI and they accidentally said it out loud.
Sus but not scum tell yetIn post 24, excallq wrote:I am posting because it will look suspicious if I don't.
I mean hello everyone.
shouldn’t I have towny self-awareness. VOTE: excallqIn post 51, excallq wrote:I have no self-awareness at all, scummy or otherwise.
In post 43, Rannygazoo wrote:Is this scummy self-awareness too?
In post 24, excallq wrote:I am posting because it will look suspicious if I don't.
I mean hello everyone.
Ig I’ll look at ranny gut read is w/v or v/wIn post 208, excallq wrote:Maybe he's nervous.In post 200, bugspray wrote:i dont think scum is likely to flip flop like that but i agree that they dont show a great agenda
VOTE: Rannygazoo
And WHO is that scum?In post 276, Jake The Wolfie wrote:Mainly DGB and Ranny. They haven't really done anything pro-town, like scumhunting. Granted, it's only Day 1, but still. DBG especially just wanted T3 out to 'validate information' and 'make sure a miller doesn't make it to endgame.'In post 269, Titus wrote:Who are your suspects then Jake?Well, it just kinda came out of nowhere and exploded onto the town's discourse. I think this is because some scum had TMI and they accidentally said it out loud.
this post is excessively apologetic and is scum indicative unless this is the kind of person to be so much apologeticIn post 273, cw357 wrote:I’m going to read up on what’s happened;sorry for being inactive
I’m also on mobile :/
You're saying many things at the same time.In post 279, Jake The Wolfie wrote:
Well, it just kinda came out of nowhere and exploded onto the town's discourse. I think this is because some scum had TMI and they accidentally said it out loud.
Can you explain these TRs?In post 258, Jessica Rabbit wrote:I like egix, jake and vfp the most rn. I didn’t really like DGB’s wanted to lim T3 based on the miller claim. You should only lim a miller claim for the same reasons as anyone else - because you actually think they’re scum and it seemed to me that DGB’s sole reason for pushing T3 was the claim. If she gave other reasons for this, I don’t recall.
JakeTheWolfie, 127.In post 285, DrippingGoofball wrote:You're saying many things at the same time.In post 279, Jake The Wolfie wrote:
Well, it just kinda came out of nowhere and exploded onto the town's discourse. I think this is because some scum had TMI and they accidentally said it out loud.
1. "The discourse CAME OUT OF NOWHERE." You know that there is a player who was first in bringing it up.NAME THAT PLAYER.
2. "The scum ACCIDENTALLY SAID IT OUT LOUD". So who said it out loud?NAME THAT PLAYER AND LINK THE POST.
I have follow up questions.
DO NOT WEASEL OUT. I want short, direct answers. The name of the player, and the quote. That's it.
Only if they know there isn't a real miller.In post 259, DrippingGoofball wrote:Does that make miller a great claim for scum to hide behind? Yes/no
How does that even happen... I thought it was a three-strike system?In post 284, Rannygazoo wrote:Cw was prodded six times in our last game.
Rodan, 148.In post 288, DrippingGoofball wrote:Well isn't that interesting that it was YOU who brought up the topic.
Now - who else talked about traitors soon after you did and was really convinced?
Name and quote please.
It was a newbie game and the mod was focused on retaining new players. (And maybe the mod didn't want to bring anyone new into such a miserable game.)In post 289, Egix96 wrote:How does that even happen... I thought it was a three-strike system?In post 284, Rannygazoo wrote:Cw was prodded six times in our last game.
...
In post 275, cw357 wrote:On mobile it’s hard to doIn post 90, Jessica Rabbit wrote:This is a first, promising to do RQS later. Why RQS?In post 85, cw357 wrote:hi; I just got here (have been travelling)
post 24 makes excallq look very suspicious
ill do RQS in a few hours when i have computer accessabilityWhere I’m from they do rqsIn post 99, Egix96 wrote:Don't bother. RQS is a scumtell anywayIn post 85, cw357 wrote:ill do RQS in a few hours
While if cw continues to do this, we'd have to. I'd rather use d1 to hunt though.In post 291, Rannygazoo wrote:It was a newbie game and the mod was focused on retaining new players. (And maybe the mod didn't want to bring anyone new into such a miserable game.)In post 289, Egix96 wrote:How does that even happen... I thought it was a three-strike system?In post 284, Rannygazoo wrote:Cw was prodded six times in our last game.
You can already see the pattern with cw: apologize for being inactive, post something that proves he's not following, bounce, repeat. Just eliminate the slot.
OKIn post 290, Jake The Wolfie wrote:Rodan, 148.In post 288, DrippingGoofball wrote:Well isn't that interesting that it was YOU who brought up the topic.
Now - who else talked about traitors soon after you did and was really convinced?
Name and quote please.
T3, 149.
