In post 2831, cyrus62 wrote:Its not a real bet I said scum bucks but will stop it
I just can't afford to even look like I'm skirting the rules, and taunting me to do something that could conceivably be misconstrued as rules-lawyering just isn't fair okay, IMHO.
I don’t believe that this was an intentional case of baiting someone, but consider this a preemptive warning. If I believe someone is attempting to create a situation where another player is forced to break the rules, I will take action.
WRT the rule in question it is largely intended for things like sig or avatar bets with a tangible outcome, but it is always wise not to skirt the grey area between the letter and the spirit of the law.
Gamma how about you vote titus and if she flips green you can lim me tomorrow with no resistance? I just really think that's the lynchpin in all of this. Scum may have something planned with the no kill or they have nothing planned at all. If it is jjh, he makes little sense with anyone aside from mastina who is partially confirmed too. It might pay to get a claim from NM tomorrow if he makes it to double check that angle. But aside from that I think house has been playing so many angles today in what looks like a huge attempt to move the wagon off titus. We moved the wagon onto LMFT yesterday which he was happy to be part of, all his intent today has been to get either cyrus or me limmed. If I get limmed today it would be better to lim the person protecting titus instead of titus which could be part of the play.
In post 2855, Moongrass wrote:Scum may have something planned with the no kill or they have nothing planned at all.
I’m rather concerned about this, I kinda feel like this angle on the no-kill is rather reminiscent of how Noraa played around a no-kill in mafiasunny 1, where she was scum
This sort of all-over-the-place thought process just vibes like her posting in that game towards endgame, trying to look solvy by throwing out a bunch of barely coherent speculation
We're falling through space, you and me, clinging to the skin of this tiny little world, and if we let go...That's who I am.
In post 2855, Moongrass wrote:Scum may have something planned with the no kill or they have nothing planned at all.
I’m rather concerned about this, I kinda feel like this angle on the no-kill is rather reminiscent of how Noraa played around a no-kill in mafiasunny 1, where she was scum
This sort of all-over-the-place thought process just vibes like her posting in that game towards endgame, trying to look solvy by throwing out a bunch of barely coherent speculation
Yeah i could see it, which is why i’ve been reserved directly calling them town, even if i generally think they’ve been doing surface level "townie" things.
