LOCKTOWNNNNNNNNN SOUL MASONIn post 1422, Infinity 324 wrote:Yeah fast night
it can't be coincidence.
LOCKTOWNNNNNNNNN SOUL MASONIn post 1422, Infinity 324 wrote:Yeah fast night
Nakata isnt scum. Scum don't just rep in and vote the largest wagon.
I mean he just got to flip me, idk why he wouldntIn post 1425, Noraa wrote:LOCKTOWNNNNNNNNN SOUL MASONIn post 1422, Infinity 324 wrote:Yeah fast night
it can't be coincidence.
twilight trolling here has no point. I counted the votes and that was hammer.In post 1428, Prism wrote:I think skitter's motivation w/ the Hectic push would be a bit different than portrayed but we shall see
To add to this, I nearly gave scum another day to live and perhaps the game. Super was at E-1 and scum was at E-1 the day before lylo. Everyone was very split solely because of paranoia of Super. I think that's the same thing here. The overall gamestate and my own read match my last games perfectly. It's a literal duplicate.In post 1430, Noraa wrote:Nvm im not writing hectic's case rn. I want to tell prism something instead.
Prism. You say Super has a very scary scum game right? I read super correctly in my last game with her. Also ydrasse is not super, their play style's are VERY similar. Why do you think it's not right to TR ydrasse here?
I paranoia'd myself to hell and back with super and I feel the exact same here. Everyone is suspicious of ydrasse just like Super was scum's counter wagon. I don't think that we should treat them with more caution just because they have better scum games. Well we should but not exactly. Like when they're sounding towny, that's just town? I haven't seen ydra's scum game in a hot sec but I don't think it would be much different from supers
In post 1428, Prism wrote:I think skitter's motivation w/ the Hectic push would be a bit different than portrayed but we shall see
This was about what a hypothetical scum-Skitter's motivation would have been in pushing the slot. I don't think it would have been as straightforward as just trying to get Hectic through, but this is now an obvious counterfactual.In post 1429, skitter30 wrote:Idk what you're trying to say
Nakata wanted to address that an apology is and was entirely unnecessary. Nakata wasn't upset by skitter30's approach to him, he just thought it was very scum!indicative for her, because Nakata's more typical experiences with skitter30 have involved her trying to sort slots that are maybe unclear to her through prodding them for motivations rather than what Nakata felt was a stronger response in this game than the typical to him. Nakata also felt skitter30 did feel very survivalistic and couldn't tell why should would present as strongly in that sense if she were town.In post 1400, skitter30 wrote:Sorry i shouldnt be so confrontational, i apologizeIn post 1389, Satoru Nakata wrote:Nakata disagrees that skitter30’s posting doesn’t feel survivalists and thinks that skitter30!town would have engaged with Nakata in a less confrontational way if skitter30 were town.