yes, that's what i thought you meant. but please elaborate. nomnomnom, Dwlee, Seanzie, T3, Kyuoku, and I all thought that boxxy was scummy, and we had very laid-out reasons for thinking sa much. But it was still convincing and nuanced. Why did you think we were wrong?In post 1597, Almost50 wrote:it was an unfounded push with no real good reasoning that lead to the exposure of a TPR on D1. THAT is BAD in my book.
Of course, now in hindsight, boxxy is the only claimed investigative and it's probably wrong. But you didn't know that. You didn't know everybody else's role and you didn't know if one of us pushing him were PRs who had a good reason to doubt him. Still you were confident. Why?