Where?In post 274, Xlos wrote:Because I was asking how we could help you achieve that goal, and you didn't respond to that question.
I would have noticed someone engaging with my post if that happened.
I just checked your ISO and I don't see it.
Where?In post 274, Xlos wrote:Because I was asking how we could help you achieve that goal, and you didn't respond to that question.
Almost?In post 265, DrippingGoofball wrote:Right now I don't know who else to vote for.
Assuming this is true, why? Why does this feel bottom heavy?In post 278, MURDERCAT wrote:These are xlos's reads:
{Jake}
{Toog, nom}
{Wheme, Almost, MC, Italiano/Gardon}
{Goofball, Flea, Titus}
{T3}
Feels bottom heavy
Okay, I believe you on that. See the below quote:In post 275, nomnomnom wrote:Where?In post 274, Xlos wrote:Because I was asking how we could help you achieve that goal, and you didn't respond to that question.
I would have noticed someone engaging with my post if that happened.
I just checked your ISO and I don't see it.
In post 259, Xlos wrote: nomnomnom: Town lean. Posts seem fine. Though I guess there's one thing that seems a bit weird to me, in 26 he says something good will happen if we end on a prime number of pages and follows up with 87 indicating that it's serious. It seems fake to me though: if that was really his role, then wouldn't Ircher have been more specific about it?I mean, do days end when the hammer happens, or after the discussion?@nomnomnom please elaborate on this. I'm also not sure how much believe that a role with that kind of requirement would exist for some reasons that I will not mention. In any case, I think it's worth listening to, and ending days at the right time.
Yeah, when I write 'scum lean' here, I'm considering a 50/50 a priori chance of being scum. While this isn't really true, it helps create more discernable categories. I also think that the lack of posts has lead to me feeling more negative about people in general.MURDERCAT wrote:These are xlos's reads:
{Jake}
{Toog, nom}
{Wheme, Almost, MC, Italiano/Gardon}
{Goofball, Flea, Titus}
{T3}
Feels bottom heavy
Having only a single town read is weak when 75% of the game is townIn post 279, Jake The Wolfie wrote:Assuming this is true, why? Why does this feel bottom heavy?
Most likely scenario I think that both of you are town. Originally I thought that Almost50 just wanted to stir up some action and targeted you basically at random, but then there were signs later on that he was serious about it. And a lot more people joined him on that trip that I would have expected. I think scum hopping on a town-created wagon makes the most sense, but I really have no idea.In post 277, MURDERCAT wrote:Xlos you can't still be null on both almost and myself. How many scum do you think there are in the two of us?
I don't really understand the first part of your first sentence, can you say it again? I think there's a grammar mistake. From what I gather, you're mad that I asked the question in the readslist and not before. But you posted ignoring the question after I wrote the readlist, so I don't see why this would matter. And you're continuing to not answer the question.In post 283, nomnomnom wrote:Xlos that was when you posted your readslist, I was expecting you to point you engaging with it beforehand, and it still doesn't explain why you don't engage with T3's claim. And as you pointed you, you're only engaging with it "because I asked to"?
This just feels like scumposting to me.
Do you think that everyone below me on their readlist is either null or scummy?In post 281, MURDERCAT wrote:Having only a single town read is weak when 75% of the game is townIn post 279, Jake The Wolfie wrote:Assuming this is true, why? Why does this feel bottom heavy?
I don't know how to really formulate this so I'll try my best.In post 285, Xlos wrote:I don't really understand the first part of your first sentence, can you say it again? I think there's a grammar mistake. From what I gather, you're mad that I asked the question in the readslist and not before. But you posted ignoring the question after I wrote the readlist, so I don't see why this would matter. And you're continuing to not answer the question.In post 283, nomnomnom wrote:Xlos that was when you posted your readslist, I was expecting you to point you engaging with it beforehand, and it still doesn't explain why you don't engage with T3's claim. And as you pointed you, you're only engaging with it "because I asked to"?
This just feels like scumposting to me.
I don't think you got my point in my last post either, since it should answer these concerns. I'm not sure if T3's claim is something we should be engaging in. Generally, if someone makes a weak roleclaim or indicator of their role, I don't talk about it. It may lead to giving mafia info they don't need to know. T3 said what he wanted to say about his role, and I'm not going to press him for more unless there's a real need. So the only way I'll want to talk about it is if there's an indicator that it's ok to talk about, and the only person that can give that indicator is the person who knows what the role is. In your case, you said that we could talk about it. And thus we should talk about it. But now that I'm trying to start a discussion on it, you're ignoring it, which is not the reaction that I would expect from someone genuinely interested in getting the requirement of a prime number of pages fulfilled.
There were two lean towns as well, but that still feels bottom heavy. Scum has an incentive to have a lot of scum reads because they have more flexibility on where to push. I'm not scum reading xlos at the moment, but it's worth forcing them to take positions regardlessIn post 286, Jake The Wolfie wrote:Do you think that everyone below me on their readlist is either null or scummy?
Yeah that sounds nowhere near genuine.
I've taken over for Italiano.In post 261, Xlos wrote:Ok I hit tab and then my post submitted mid edit... I didn't think I pushed enter afterwards but I must have, since my last post has a \ where my cursor was. And correct pronouns.
Anyways.
ItalianoVD: 2 posts so far = super null.
JakeTheWolfie: Probably town. Pretending to want to be lynched is kinda scary to do as scum since your team has some expectations of you. I'm not sure why anysuspects MurderKitty, though. Any seems to get to the point where he believes the 'first 3 posters' rule, then it kind of reads that he suspects MurderKitty because of it. But, uh, there are 2 other posters in the first 3 posters. They are simply not mentioned.
Titus: Null. Maybe a bit scummy? I feel like mafia built that wagon and she was on it + voted me earlier.
I think that's all 12 other people.
What kind of question is this btw? I kinda forgot I can interact with people in this game rather than read and find clues, but this made no sense. I'm not asking from a "are you saying this because you're scum" angle, it's more of a "but why would you even say this" kinda angleIn post 277, MURDERCAT wrote:Xlos you can't still be null on both almost and myself. How many scum do you think there are in the two of us?
I don't see your point. I'm trying to engage with everybody, not just you. That was the point of the read list. You can interpret that as you like. I don't really know how to explain why I want to discuss it any better than I have the these last posts. If you don't want to talk about it, then just say so, we don't have to talk about your claim. If you do want to talk about it, then stop avoiding the question.In post 287, nomnomnom wrote:I don't know how to really formulate this so I'll try my best.In post 285, Xlos wrote:I don't really understand the first part of your first sentence, can you say it again? I think there's a grammar mistake. From what I gather, you're mad that I asked the question in the readslist and not before. But you posted ignoring the question after I wrote the readlist, so I don't see why this would matter. And you're continuing to not answer the question.In post 283, nomnomnom wrote:Xlos that was when you posted your readslist, I was expecting you to point you engaging with it beforehand, and it still doesn't explain why you don't engage with T3's claim. And as you pointed you, you're only engaging with it "because I asked to"?
This just feels like scumposting to me.
I don't think you got my point in my last post either, since it should answer these concerns. I'm not sure if T3's claim is something we should be engaging in. Generally, if someone makes a weak roleclaim or indicator of their role, I don't talk about it. It may lead to giving mafia info they don't need to know. T3 said what he wanted to say about his role, and I'm not going to press him for more unless there's a real need. So the only way I'll want to talk about it is if there's an indicator that it's ok to talk about, and the only person that can give that indicator is the person who knows what the role is. In your case, you said that we could talk about it. And thus we should talk about it. But now that I'm trying to start a discussion on it, you're ignoring it, which is not the reaction that I would expect from someone genuinely interested in getting the requirement of a prime number of pages fulfilled.
The tl;dr is fhat I feel you're engaging me solely for the purpose of looking like you're discussing with people.
If you don't value claims like that and if you think discussing claims at all benefits scum, then why are you discussing this with me at all?
Do you see my point?
In post 294, DrippingGoofball wrote:It's still early but Jake and MURDERCAT give off good vibrations.
In post 33, Flea The Magician wrote:My mathmatical skill is comparible to orks.
One... One... More... more... many... lots... chaingun.
VOTE: MURDERCAT
Edit: Vote modified to be read properly by the automated VCer.
~Ircher
In post 38, Flea The Magician wrote:I have a City and Guilds Level 2 Adult Educations in Maths
Equivalent to a General Certificate of Secondary Education at Grade C
In post 42, Flea The Magician wrote:Titus can be locktown just for thatIn post 39, Titus wrote:He's my brother. I claim post 314.In post 35, DrippingGoofball wrote:I would like everyone to detail their relationship with math, your answers will be considered alignment-indicative.
In post 50, Flea The Magician wrote:how awful it would be if I just stole it..
In post 142, Flea The Magician wrote:I have absolutely no clue where I'm from in this imaginary Math Land
I don't like this ISO. It feels void of anything meaty, and "assuming" MC is ton the vote on him was opportunistic.In post 143, Flea The Magician wrote:Ya'll are doing too much Mathy stuff for me.
I do know how to make 2+2=5 though :3