Saber (2): Caster, Beast
Assassin (1): Rider
(expired on 2021-07-04 22:00:49)
Page usage: 8/42
In post 159, Servant Alter Ego wrote:In post 17, Servant Berserker wrote:Anyone who has not done so already should go read Cabds comments from the first game on the preliminary master vote. The short version is decide on a charismatic player to receive it, and let them either lead town or get taken out entirely if scum.With regard to Lancer, I mostly liked this sequence on the first page. The response didn't feel like one scum would make, I would've expected somethng more self-conscious. Posting since then has been largely mechanical so I wouldn't say it's the strongest read, but as far as early vibes go they've been all right.In post 18, Servant Lancer wrote:In that case, I’m all for being selected
In post 155, Servant Alter Ego wrote:After sleeping on it, I'm not sure that I particularly care if Assassin's claim is a nefarious scum ploy - I think the risk/reward is in our favor regardless and I wouldn't mind voting there because it sorts them early.
In post 141, Servant Alter Ego wrote:Not any particularly strong ones, but Assassin is pinging for his approach, as mentioned earlier. Still taking a bit of a "wait and see" approach. I tend to prefer to play via POE, though.
In post 131, Servant Alter Ego wrote:Here's a question for you, Beast: Why did you feel the need to ask me that?
noIn post 111, Servant Alter Ego wrote:In that sense Saber's vagueness and caginess about their role seems more town.
do you have a point?In post 173, Servant Foreigner wrote:yea sure on second page
yea its in 170In post 181, Servant Caster wrote:do you have a point?In post 173, Servant Foreigner wrote:yea sure on second page
What about the reads she opened the game with?In post 183, Servant Foreigner wrote:yea its in 170In post 181, Servant Caster wrote:do you have a point?In post 173, Servant Foreigner wrote:yea sure on second page
I tend to ignore people announcing scumreads on me with no justification. I'm not sure this is a particularly reliable way of reading people.In post 187, Servant Caster wrote:a big red flag for me is that neither of them reacted to the scum-read at all.
It was RVS equivalent, read which was made about berserker (who at that moment made 3 posts) has no real value behind it. The AI behavior is the one which happens after.In post 188, Servant Alter Ego wrote:What about the reads she opened the game with?In post 183, Servant Foreigner wrote:yea its in 170In post 181, Servant Caster wrote:do you have a point?In post 173, Servant Foreigner wrote:yea sure on second page
I talk about other players on pages other than page two as wellIn post 192, Servant Foreigner wrote:It was RVS equivalent, read which was made about berserker (who at that moment made 3 posts) has no real value behind it. The AI behavior is the one which happens after.
yea this is how pro playsIn post 186, Servant Caster wrote:It's anti-town for me to explain the thought process behind the scum-read before the elimination phase of the game and irrelevant to master selection since neither of them are likely to be selected at this point.
no that's just one of the reasons I continue to scum-read you/archerIn post 197, Servant Berserker wrote:So your reason for scumreading us is the way we reacted to you scumreading us.
Pedit-
Foreigner, would you be interested in voting me to be master?