Impulsive maybe, but he's being more open with his reads, and the way he's engaged with people has been positive. Saber feels closed off. I don't know how to explain my feelings on Saber without going against the spirit of the game and being...kind of rude.In post 254, Servant Beast wrote:I can't really imagine what you see in Assassin's personality that makes them preferable to saber. Assassin's entrance, if town, was impulsive.In post 244, Servant Alter Ego wrote:I don't see a need to rush the phase, especially when Ruler and Shielder have yet to post. I want everyone to weigh in.In post 242, Servant Beast wrote:Does anyone have serious objections to Saber getting the boost.
I'd like to move on.
I actually think my preference is more toward Berserker or Assassin, though that decision is partly motivated by personality, as I think they'd be easier to work with than Saber. (Although I do think Assassin became much townier when he started talking about his reads and not just his role mechanics)
I'm not sure why you'd think such a declaration to be town-indicative at all. That's a fairly trivial post.In post 259, Servant Ruler wrote:To this end, whileServant Archermay have declared they're not the best choice for mastership, they are the first servant who I feel lacks corruption. In the rvs, it is difficult to reliably differentiate between the pure and the corrupt, however,Servant Archerseems to genuinely be integrating into our group without deliberately trying;Servant Archer's early stances appear pure of heart.
This is interesting. Can you explain further without referencing their identity explicitly? What tendencies are they showing?In post 270, Servant Ruler wrote:This should also serve as answer to your 265; if my guess at Servant Saber's identity is correct, they are corrupt (thus their placement), but if my guess at Servant Saber's identity is wrong, then there's little to tell if they are corrupt or pure. They may still be corrupt off of their later posting even if I am wrong, but I admit my guess at their identity may be biasing me towards this conclusion.
What is this supposed to mean?In post 278, Servant Beast wrote:ngl, every time Archer posts I want to tease them relentlessly for their shoe-string rationales.
Jokes on me if they're scum tho.
I'm saying they're super opinionated and make a lot of assumptions, they're also pretty clumsy with word choice. Their thinking is messy and seems pretty gut based. If they're town.In post 280, Servant Alter Ego wrote:What is this supposed to mean?In post 278, Servant Beast wrote:ngl, every time Archer posts I want to tease them relentlessly for their shoe-string rationales.
Jokes on me if they're scum tho.
Signature material right her, imoIn post 282, Servant Beast wrote:they're super opinionated and make a lot of assumptions, they're also pretty clumsy with word choice
Deciding who should get the master is a 2 part problem: who gives us the greatest mechanical advantage, and who would serve best as town leader.In post 283, Servant Beast wrote:They're also fairly agenda driven and they have a clearish trejectory but their reasoning is so weird that while I can see where they're going I don't really get why they're going there.
I mean, did you read where he said we should assume they're all equally good mech choices? Why in the world would you assume that in a game with roles that have extremely distinct abilities.
In post 277, Servant Archer wrote:So I think that there are 3 players who have actively said that they want it :: Berserker, Assassin, and Saber.
VOTE: Berserker
I am going to assume the mech between the three of them is a wash -- basically, if they were town, and had a bad NP, I imagine they would have backed out of the running - so from here, I think we should assume they are all equal mech wise. At this point I would rather none of the 3 of them give any more info on their NPs, and I don't think it serves town to keep that the focus of the decision
So ignoring the mech side at this point, I think berserker looks like they would be the best town leader.
A big plus for them, in my opinon, is that they do not even seem all that focused on getting the master. Yes they made it clear that they wanted it, but if you scroll through their iso, it is way more focused on interacting with other players and building reads.
Compared to the other two seem, whose isos are 75%+ just talking about why they should get the master slot.
Like, the two are claiming they would work well as town leader, but berserker is showing it already imo
Assassin has outright claimed what they can offer, in response Saber claimed their ability is at least as good, if not better, and following that Berserker continues to claim that they would be a good choice instead of backing down and choosing one of the other two.In post 285, Servant Archer wrote:So, I think we should skip past that discussion, and therefore I am treating them as all equally good mech choices.
Uh, no? What kind of question is that lolIn post 286, Servant Caster wrote:Would you be ok with being the Day 1 elimination if Berserker is Mafia?
That is an entirely different question then...In post 289, Servant Caster wrote:Well I have you and berserker as mafia together...
if the town ignores this and makes berserker master and you are one of the key drivers of this, wouldn't you expect me to hard-drive for your elimination on D1?
I already scum-read you.In post 295, Servant Archer wrote:Do I understand that you might scum read me on a Berserker scum flip? - Yeah