Care to share?In post 822, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:yup
As Pooky said, he’s acting crazy but I read it as he actually seems to believe what he’s saying and please don’t ask me to explain it.
I think he actually tries as scum.
Care to share?In post 822, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:yup
You seem like a nice guy, I will try to dial it down, but if other players ask me to dial it up, I may entertain that too. The crazy is at 7/10 at the moment.In post 819, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:I can't read crazy people
I strongly disagree with this. We are early in the game and it's not a good idea for scum to choke out their voting options by claiming a town block, especially one that contains controversial elements (me), and in such an easy going manner.In post 802, Satoru Nakata wrote:Nakata thinks trying to create townblocs is scummy.
what made you sure Robert was town from that?In post 771, Morning Tweet wrote:lol i knew robert was town
That's wrong! I think Robert is evaluating clidd / his defenders incorrectly, but that does NOT mean I am questioning his alignment! I am free to disagree with the thought processes of anybody, no?In post 811, Satoru Nakata wrote:Nakata thinks that Morning Tweet continuing to interrogate Robert in the manner of 776 and 778 means that Morning Tweet is presenting as being unsure of his alignment
wait from his wagon reaction or from earlier back in the game? It was a hunch back then but now it's pretty strong. I'll probably elaborate on why his reaction comes off as towny later if that's what u meanIn post 830, Chara wrote:what made you sure Robert was town from that?In post 771, Morning Tweet wrote:lol i knew robert was town
No impression of Nakata in the past, i cannot remember a transition. It's because I wanted to slip off Chara wagon onto a wagon i have higher hopes for -- in this case, it was cause i disapprove of Robert wagon and i like ydrasse/infy/whoever was voting nakata.In post 815, clidd wrote:@Morning
Could you describe the transition from your past and current impression of Nakata before the vote? Did you have any influence from a particular post (quote) or was it a spontaneous conclusion? (considering that the vote took place late).
from his later reaction, since it sounds like you were reacting to that. i'm kind of in agreement with Tanner that i didn't really get much from Robert returning and being angry, so my first thought was your confidence seemed like too much. but it looks like players besides you are in agreement on that (Robert being towny) so explaining what you're seeing would be helpful to me.In post 828, Robert M Hunter wrote:I strongly disagree with this. We are early in the game and it's not a good idea for scum to choke out their voting options by claiming a town block, especially one that contains controversial elements (me), and in such an easy going manner.In post 802, Satoru Nakata wrote:Nakata thinks trying to create townblocs is scummy.
Satoru: 771 a few posts previous has Tweetie giving a hard townread on Robert, and the interrogation posts you're pointing to don't really look interrogative at all to me.In post 834, Morning Tweet wrote:No impression of Nakata in the past, i cannot remember a transition. It's because I wanted to slip off Chara wagon onto a wagon i have higher hopes for -- in this case, it was cause i disapprove ofIn post 815, clidd wrote:@Morning
Could you describe the transition from your past and current impression of Nakata before the vote? Did you have any influence from a particular post (quote) or was it a spontaneous conclusion? (considering that the vote took place late).In post 831, Morning Tweet wrote:That's wrong! I think Robert is evaluating clidd / his defenders incorrectly, but that does NOT mean I am questioning his alignment! I am free to disagree with the thought processes of anybody, no?In post 811, Satoru Nakata wrote:Nakata thinks that Morning Tweet continuing to interrogate Robert in the manner of 776 and 778 means that Morning Tweet is presenting as being unsure of his alignment
And i actually think it's more important to devote time debating and changing minds with your townreads
In post 738, Robert M Hunter wrote:I'm actually more suspicious of the players defending me, because it's blatantly obvious that I won't survive into the night to use my power, and it's very safe for them to say I'm town when they know I'm town.
I feel shitting scum reading the only players that read me correctly, so I'm very conflicted.
Anyway, if I could be a ghost after I get eliminated, that's where I'd look. The players that defended me.
i do like 738, but then i read 741 and the indecision feels like when i'm scum and don't know which angle is the best one to take, so i go for indecision/the uninformed look.In post 741, Robert M Hunter wrote:Objectively there are no reasons to town read me that hold water.
But then, the reasons to scum read me seem very opportunistic. Why are players hung up scum-reading me into page 25 or so, because they pretend to be baffled that I didn't know that Datisi = Tanner? They are hanging on to this notion because they know I'm the easy player to eliminate because I work all day long and don't have the leisure to play all day and defend myself immediately, so that false accusations simmer.