No no no what I mean isIn post 847, DrippingGoofball wrote:People were asked to flavor claim, I'm the only one who has actually claimed a role in addition to the flavor.In post 842, MathBlade wrote:but DGB’s claim is an action
That's why my claim is singularly an action - so far.
QED
Alright Math... you want trollIn post 850, MathBlade wrote:No no no what I mean isIn post 847, DrippingGoofball wrote:People were asked to flavor claim, I'm the only one who has actually claimed a role in addition to the flavor.In post 842, MathBlade wrote:but DGB’s claim is an action
That's why my claim is singularly an action - so far.
QED
“First Derivative Test” is an action.
It’s a thing someone does. It doesn’t match everyone else’s flavor.
I think flavor has some importance just I think piecing it together now is dangerous.In post 843, Galron wrote:There are really only about five players actually saying anything. I count myself as not pulling my weight as far as that goes. So boredom? But A50's role apparently means he's a neighbor infmored about a specifc flavor matching a specifc role. I think that's where it started. As I type that out it sounds about as convo;uted as nom's claimed role.In post 839, Jake The Wolfie wrote:Why are we talking about flavor and mech instead of analyzing the players?
pedit: So I guess that probably means flavor and roles don't really match.
I am sorry, are you legit suggesting that DGB and nom are both town? Am I reading that correctly?In post 851, Titus wrote:Alright Math... you want trollIn post 850, MathBlade wrote:No no no what I mean isIn post 847, DrippingGoofball wrote:People were asked to flavor claim, I'm the only one who has actually claimed a role in addition to the flavor.In post 842, MathBlade wrote:but DGB’s claim is an action
That's why my claim is singularly an action - so far.
QED
“First Derivative Test” is an action.
It’s a thing someone does. It doesn’t match everyone else’s flavor.
The flavor miller that doesn't claim D1 checks the actual miller who doesn't claim day 1 and they both get upset with each other for being too bad to be town while the rest of us just blow fireworks rather than blow our actual lids.
She's pseudo-trolling like she said in the preface.In post 853, MathBlade wrote:I am sorry, are you legit suggesting that DGB and nom are both town? Am I reading that correctly?In post 851, Titus wrote:Alright Math... you want trollIn post 850, MathBlade wrote:No no no what I mean isIn post 847, DrippingGoofball wrote:People were asked to flavor claim, I'm the only one who has actually claimed a role in addition to the flavor.In post 842, MathBlade wrote:but DGB’s claim is an action
That's why my claim is singularly an action - so far.
QED
“First Derivative Test” is an action.
It’s a thing someone does. It doesn’t match everyone else’s flavor.
The flavor miller that doesn't claim D1 checks the actual miller who doesn't claim day 1 and they both get upset with each other for being too bad to be town while the rest of us just blow fireworks rather than blow our actual lids.
That seems to be xlos's point. And I'm guessing wheme's.In post 852, MathBlade wrote:I think flavor has some importance just I think piecing it together now is dangerous.
I am not so sure. I think Titus is considering the possibility. I find it utterly ridiculous here but sometimes her “moonlogic” (I don’t mean offense here just she can have a different way of thinking) and I wanna see where she goes with it. That’s why I am asking if she is legit suggesting it.In post 855, Galron wrote:She's pseudo-trolling like she said in the preface.In post 853, MathBlade wrote:I am sorry, are you legit suggesting that DGB and nom are both town? Am I reading that correctly?In post 851, Titus wrote:Alright Math... you want trollIn post 850, MathBlade wrote:No no no what I mean isIn post 847, DrippingGoofball wrote:People were asked to flavor claim, I'm the only one who has actually claimed a role in addition to the flavor.In post 842, MathBlade wrote:but DGB’s claim is an action
That's why my claim is singularly an action - so far.
QED
“First Derivative Test” is an action.
It’s a thing someone does. It doesn’t match everyone else’s flavor.
The flavor miller that doesn't claim D1 checks the actual miller who doesn't claim day 1 and they both get upset with each other for being too bad to be town while the rest of us just blow fireworks rather than blow our actual lids.
And mine first.In post 856, Galron wrote:That seems to be xlos's point. And I'm guessing wheme's.In post 852, MathBlade wrote:I think flavor has some importance just I think piecing it together now is dangerous.
I don't remember that.In post 858, MathBlade wrote:And mine first.In post 856, Galron wrote:That seems to be xlos's point. And I'm guessing wheme's.In post 852, MathBlade wrote:I think flavor has some importance just I think piecing it together now is dangerous.
What exactly is stopping you from voting him?In post 360, MURDERCAT wrote:I think if I were to try to hero solve this would be my team:
{Almost50, theslimer3 (now mathblade), Galron}
I’d rather her elaborate.In post 859, Galron wrote:I don't see why they both can't be town. Queue DGB. But I don't think that's what Titus's point was.
I can’t believe I agree with a top scumread. What is this game?In post 863, DrippingGoofball wrote:I can't believe we have a guilty and we're even thinking voting some other player.
In post 864, MathBlade wrote:I’d rather her elaborate.In post 859, Galron wrote:I don't see why they both can't be town. Queue DGB. But I don't think that's what Titus's point was.
For me is the DGB+nom3 situation. I don’t see myself voting outside there short of someone scum claiming or a damn good explanation. I agree he’s suspicious but the only one elim a day makes it difficult.
What makes you say their lying about their role?
I am pretty sure they’re a neighbor. That seems an odd thing to lie about? Unless you mean lying about the informed bit which is unfalsifiable. If no one matches the flavor A50 expects then A50 just says so player X is scum and a 1v1 forms. Or if someone matches the flavor then A50 says “player X matches the flavor” or maybe not even that. There’s no way to check him. So since there’s no way to check it no way to know if he is lying and this bs about flavor shouldn’t even have started today with all the open claims.
If he was telling the truth, he would know the alignment of that player already based on the flavor. Unless you believe that scum flavor are going to be the names of formal mathematics operations. That wouldn't make any sense though. The fact that he doesn't know the alignment means that he hasn't totally thought through the information his role gave him, and thus it is a lie.In post 864, MathBlade wrote:What makes you say their lying about their role?In post 859, Galron wrote:I don't see why they both can't be town. Queue DGB. But I don't think that's what Titus's point was.
I am pretty sure they’re a neighbor. That seems an odd thing to lie about? Unless you mean lying about the informed bit which is unfalsifiable. If no one matches the flavor A50 expects then A50 just says so player X is scum and a 1v1 forms. Or if someone matches the flavor then A50 says “player X matches the flavor” or maybe not even that. There’s no way to check him. So since there’s no way to check it no way to know if he is lying and this bs about flavor shouldn’t even have started today with all the open claims.
Although your scum equity has sky rocketed in my eyes, I'll still give you the benefit of doubt and bite: Give me example(s) of hypothetical scum flavor please. Like, is.. um .. Newton's Forward Difference Formula Scum or Town? How about L'Hopitals's Rule? Give me some directions, Mister Genius.In post 792, Xlos wrote:I'm pretty certain that scum flavor will be distinguishable from town flavor
Good, now please be dumb enough to either claim it here or in our hood. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.In post 811, WhemeStar wrote:I think claiming flavor is really dumb
In post 812, Jake The Wolfie wrote:Nom, if you had just claimed miller D1 you wouldn't have been checked. Anyone who would have claimed to check you woulx probably be axed.
In addition, you probably wouldn't have been rolevlocked (although that depends on the whims of the roleblocker)
I'll eat rope today if necessary, butIn post 824, Xlos wrote:A50's claimed role is 100% a lie.
It may have been too long since I last actually practiced calculus, but isn't Second Derivative Test a "first derivative test on the first derivative"??In post 850, MathBlade wrote:“First Derivative Test” is an action.
It’s a thing someone does. It doesn’t match everyone else’s flavor.
Math.. trust me, mate. Take it on faith. I would lim between Xlos, Wheme & hake. That's my hero solve. DGB v nom is TvT. Toog is Town and so is Galron 9although neither has claimed their flavor, but I no longer want them to.)In post 864, MathBlade wrote:I’d rather her elaborate.In post 859, Galron wrote:I don't see why they both can't be town. Queue DGB. But I don't think that's what Titus's point was.
For me is the DGB+nom3 situation. I don’t see myself voting outside there short of someone scum claiming or a damn good explanation. I agree he’s suspicious but the only one elim a day makes it difficult.
What makes you say their lying about their role?
I am pretty sure they’re a neighbor. That seems an odd thing to lie about? Unless you mean lying about the informed bit which is unfalsifiable. If no one matches the flavor A50 expects then A50 just says so player X is scum and a 1v1 forms. Or if someone matches the flavor then A50 says “player X matches the flavor” or maybe not even that. There’s no way to check him. So since there’s no way to check it no way to know if he is lying and this bs about flavor shouldn’t even have started today with all the open claims.